Strategy of Self-Presentation of a Politician (Personal and Official Blogs on Twitter of US Vice President Kamala Harris)
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-11-82-105
Abstract
The issue of invariance of tactics representing the communicative strategy of the politician of the highest echelon of US power in personality self-presentation and status-conditioned discourse is considered. The research material consisted of 349 posts extracted from Kamala Harris’s personal blog on Twitter from January to July 2021 and 665 posts selected from the politician’s official blog during this period. The relevance of such studies is explained by the need to clarify the theoretical and methodological foundations of the analysis of political Internet discourse, taking into account the status of the addressee. The novelty of this research lies in the identification of tactics that actualize the strategy under study on the basis of personality and status-based discourse. The novelty of the work is also due to the fact that the tactics of self-presentation of the politician are studied in a comparative aspect. As a result of the research in personality-conditioned discourse, such tactics as solidarity, appeal, illustration of achievements, gratitude, identification, hypertrophy of the “I-theme” were identified. In the status-conditioned discourse, the authors recorded the tactics of solidarity, appeal, illustration of achievements, gratitude, identification, exaggeration of the “I-theme”, promises. The linguistic techniques that actualize the tactics of selfpresentation in personality and status-conditioned discourse are described.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. A. KamenevaRussian Federation
Veronika A. Kameneva, Doctor of Philology, Professor Department of Romance and Germanic Philology
Kemerovo
N. V. Potapova
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Potapova, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor Department of Romance and Germanic Philology
Kemerovo
References
1. Besedina, E. A., Burkova, T. V., Michurin, A. N. (2019). Strategy of euphemization in the formation of the political discourse of the Russian parliament during the First World War. Questions of cognitive linguistics, 2: 75—84. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2019-2-75-84. (In Russ.).
2. Chudinov, A. P., Nakhimova, E. A., Nikiforova, M. V. (2018). Russian linguopolitical personology: a study of images of political leaders. Bulletin of the People’s Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of Language. Semiotics. Semantics, 9 (1): 14—31. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2018-9-1-14-31. (In Russ.).
3. Daineko, P. M. (2011). Discursive strategies of self-presentation in institutional Internet communication. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Moscow. 25 p. (In Russ.).
4. Demeshkina, T. A., Tolstova, M. A. (2020). Communicative strategy of self-presentation in women’s dialect discourse (based on autobiographical stories). Text. Book. Book publishing, 24: 47—67. DOI: 10.17223/23062061/24/3. (In Russ.).
5. Dmitrieva, A. V. (2018). Communicative strategies and tactics in the video texts of French political advertising. Communicative research, 3 (17): 96—113. DOI: 10.25513/2413-6182.2018.3.96-113. (In Russ.).
6. Dubrovskaya, T. V. (2017). Strategies of Positive Representation of Russian-Italian Relations in Russian Foreign Policy Discourse (based on the Russian Foreign Ministry Website). Nauchnyi dialog, 10: 26—40. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2017-10-26-40. (In Russ.).
7. Filatkina, G. S. (2015). Communicative strategies in the political media discourse of the Presidents of Venezuela, Ecuador, Brazil (1999—2014). PhD Diss. Moscow. 265 p. (In Russ.).
8. Goroshko, E. I., Polyakova, T. L. (2019). Instagram as a genre 2.0 (on the example of political communication). Genres of speech, 4 (24): 300—313. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2019-4-24-300-313. (In Russ.).
9. Karasik, V. I. (2002). Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena. 477 p. ISBN 5-88234-552-2. (In Russ.).
10. Khajavi, Y., Rasti, A. (2020). A discourse analytic investigation into politician’s use of rhetorical and persuasive strategies: The case of US election speeches. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7 (1): 1—15. DOI: 10.1080/23311983.2020.1740051.
11. Kuraleva, T. V., Kondrashova, V. N. (2018). Self-Presentation in Campaign Discourse: CorpusAssisted Study (A Case of B. Sanders’s and H. Clinton’s Campaign Speeches). Nauchnyi dialog, 4: 100—112. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2018-4-100-112. (In Russ.).
12. Milovanova, M. V., Terentyeva, E. V. (2020). Russian Political Blogs as Relevant Practice of Protest Communication: Systemic-Communicative Dimensions. Nauchnyi dialog, 6: 101—116. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-6-101-116. (In Russ.).
13. Mishlanov, V. A., Netsvetaeva, N. S. (2009). Communicative strategies and tactics in modern political discourse (based on the material of political advertising of election campaigns in 2003, 2007, 2008). Bulletin of Perm University. Russian and foreign philology, 6: 5—13. (In Russ.).
14. Monogarova, A. G., Shiryaeva, T. A., Bagiyan, A. Yu. (2020). Speech Behavior of British Politicians in Discussion of Brexit: Pragmatics, Gender and Communicative Dominance in Political Media Discourse. Nauchnyi dialog, 10: 114—127. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-10-114-127. (In Russ.).
15. Mukhortov, D. S. (2018). On the pragmalinguistic features of the verbal behavior of American President Richard Nixon (based on selected speeches). Bulletin of the People’s Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of Language. Semiotics. Semantics, 9 (1): 77—92. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2018-9-1-77-92. (In Russ.).
16. Nikiforova, E. S. (2012). Communicative strategies and tactics of judicial discourse. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 17 (271): 100—103. (In Russ.).
17. Orlova, O. V. (2013). The problem of the correlation of the concepts of style and discourse in linguistics of the beginning of the XXI century. In the context of M. N. Kozhina’s ideas. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, 4 (24): 19—25. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/24/2. (In Russ.).
18. Parshina, O. N. (2005). Strategies and tactics of speech behavior of the modern political elite of Russia. Doct. Diss. Saratov. 325 p. (In Russ.).
19. Sadeghi, B. (2014). Towards (de-) legitimation discursive strategies in news coverage of Egyptian protest: VOA & Fars news in focus. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98: 1580—1589.
20. Shiryaev, N. S. (2017). Communicative strategies of representation of national identity in political media discourse (based on the material of English and French). PhD Diss. Saratov. 195 p. (In Russ.).
21. Sukhanov, Yu. Yu. (2018). Political discourse as an object of linguistic analysis. Bulletin of the RUDN. Series: Theory of Language. Semiotics. Semantics, 9 (1): 200—212. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2018-9-1-200-212. (In Russ.).
22. Tymbai, A. A. (2018). Communicative strategies of American politicians (on the example of the 2016 election campaign). Bulletin of the People’s Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of Language. Semiotics. Semantics, 9 (1): 105—123. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2018-9-1-105-123. (In Russ.).
23. Ulanov, A. V. (2014). Communicative strategies in military discourse. Siberian Philological Journal, 4 (28): 246—254. (In Russ.).
24. Ustinova, O. V. (2018). Features of the representation of the image of Canada in political discourse. Bulletin of the People’s Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of Language. Semiotics. Semantics, 9 (1): 136—157. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2018-9-1-136-157. (In Russ.).
25. Voloshina, S. V. (2014). Communicative strategy of self-presentation in autobiographical discourse. Bulletin of Irkutsk State Technical University, 9 (92): 261—265. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kameneva V.A., Potapova N.V. Strategy of Self-Presentation of a Politician (Personal and Official Blogs on Twitter of US Vice President Kamala Harris). Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(11):82-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-11-82-105