Epitaph Dedication to Gumilyov by His Fellow Acmeists: a Play of Obvious and Secret Meanings

The issue of secret commemoration of N. S. Gumilyov by his associates is discussed in the article. Attention is paid to the role of the frame text — titles, dedications, dating of poems — in the formation of the crypto text, hiding information. The results of a comparative analysis of the texts by M.A. Zenkevich, V.I. Narbut and S.M. Gorodetsky — the so-called “small” acmeists, who implicitly and explicitly reacted to the death of N.S. Gumilyov. The question is raised about the opposition of the hidden epitaph “for the initiated”, presented in the cycle of translations from A. Chenier, performed by M.A. Zenkevich, and in the unpublished collection of V.I. Narbut “Executed Seraphim”, an explicit lampoon epitaph created by S.M. Gorodetsky. The novelty of the research is seen in the fact that the means of creating a “secret obituary”, the discourse of which was widespread during political repressions and executions is considers. The relevance of the study is due to the consideration of obituaries in the works of little-studied authors-acmeists. The authors dwell on the previously analyzed secret commemorations of N.S. Gumilyov in A.A. Akhmatova and O.E. Mandelstam, which in their content is closer to the enigmatic funeral, secret commemoration of loved ones. It is proved that Narbut and Zenkevich create a cryptonecrology, a hidden epitaph, closer to the genre of a funeral speech.

1. Byalosinskaya, N., Panchenko, N. (1990). Oblique rain. In: Narbut, V. I. Poems. Moscow: Sovremennik. 5—44. ISBN 5-270-00237-X. (In Russ.).

2. Kihney, L. G. (2005). Genre originality of Akhmatova’s epitaph lyrics. In: Anna Akhmatova: Epoch, Fate, creativity: Crimean Akhmatova scientific Collection, 3. Simferopol: Crimean Archive. 33—46. (In Russ.).

3. Kihney, L. G. (2016). The metaphor of grain in O. Mandelstam’s poem “I love under the arches of gray silence ...” In: “A feast is the best image of happiness.” Images of a meal in theology and culture. Moscow: BBI Publishing House. 180—189. ISBN 978-5-89647-336-7. (In Russ.).

4. Lekmanov, O. A. (2006). Nikolay Gumilev and the Left Acmeists: new and little-known materials. In: Gumilev Readings. Proceedings of the International Conference, April 14—16, 2006. St. Petersburg: SPbGUP Publishing House. 279—283. ISBN 5-7621-0302-1. (In Russ.).

5. Mazurik, L. How the case against the poet Nikolai Gumilev was sewn. Available at: https://pravo.ru/process/view/22152 / (accessed 18.10.2021). (In Russ.).

6. Mikhailov, A. D. (1989). Andre Chenier — yamba. Foreign literature, 7: 145—147. (In Russ.).

7. Mikhailov, G. (2010). Poetic initiation of Anna Akhmatova in the sociocultural space 1940— 1960 years. Literatūra, 52 (2): 63—79. (In Russ.).

8. Mints, B. A. (2013). Two editions of O. Mandelstam’s poem about St. Isaac’s Cathedral: on the problem of polyvariance. Philological sciences: questions of theory and practice, 9 (27) / 1: 113—117. (In Russ.).

9. Ozerov, A. L. (1994). Mikhail Zenkevich: mystery of silence. In: Zenkevich, M. A. Fabulous era: Poems. The story. Fictional memoirs. Moscow: School-Press. 675 p. ISBN 5-88527-075-9. (In Russ.).