‘Posledniy’ [Last] vs ‘Krayniy’ [Latest] in Ontological Presentation
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-4-46-67
Abstract
The question of replacement in the synonymic pair last — latest is considered. Attention is paid to the characteristics of speech stereotypes and types of frames that form substitution in a synonymic pair. The results of a comparative analysis of the heuristics of linguo-creative thinking with the level of speech culture of communicants using catachresis in this pair are presented. The study of replacements in ontological coverage is carried out, taking into account the lexicosemantic, cognitive, generistic, extralinguistic, linguocultural and orthological aspects. The variety of functions of the studied synonymic pair in various types of discourse is described. The relevance of the study is due to the ongoing linguistic fashion to replace the lexeme last with the word latest. The authors dwell on the study of memes related to synonymous replacement, identifying their functions and features. It is shown that when the function of artistic figurative concretization of the depicted is actualized, a mimetic character is manifested in the application of this substitution. The parameters of social reality, which caused the replacements in the synonymous pair of the language fashion of the “first and second wave” are determined. A characteristic of the pragmatic meanings of reflexives in newspaper discourse is proposed in relation to the functions they perform. It is shown that the substitute latest becomes a reflexoid.
About the Authors
E. P. IvanyanRussian Federation
Elena P. Ivanyan - Doctor of Philology, Professor, Department of the Russian Language, Speech Culture and Teaching Methods
Samara
A. M. Klyushina
Russian Federation
Alena M. Klyushina - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of English Philology and Intercultural Communication.
Samara
References
1. Bochenski, J. M. (1993). One hundred tab. A philosophical dictionary of superstitions. Mos-cow: Progress. 187 p. (In Russ.).
2. Borisova, E. G. (2014). Fashion and Usus: Modeling the Influence of Society on Speech. In: Fashion in language and communication: Sat. articles. Moscow: RGGU. 47—55. (In Russ.).
3. Cherginets, I. A. (2008). Meaning building of superstitions and prejudices in English and Russian linguistic cultures: author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Nalchik. 24 p. (In Russ.).
4. Golovina, E. D. (2014). Last or last? Russian speech, 4: 59—64. (In Russ.).
5. Goldin, V. E., Sirotinina, O. B. (1993). Intranational speech cultures and their interaction. In: Questions of style: interuniversity. Sat. scientific works. Iss. 25. Problems of culture of speech. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta. 9—19. (In Russ.).
6. Gridina, T. A. (2013). To the origins of verbal creativity: creative heuristics of children's speech. In: Linguistics of creativity-1: collective monograph. (2nd ed.). Ekaterinburg : Ural. gos. ped. un-t. 5—58. (In Russ.).
7. Guseynov, G. (2012). Zeros on the tip of the tongue. A short guide to Russian discourse. Moscow: Delo. 240 p. (In Russ.).
8. Guseynov, G. Why do they say "Not the last, but the last"? What is it, where does it come from? In: Mirtesen. Available at: https://agv.mirtesen.ru/blog/43998733371/Pochemu-govoryat-«Neposledniy,-a-krayniy»,-chto-eto,-otkuda (accessed 10.10.2021). (In Russ.).
9. Issers, O. S. (2017). God forbid, not the last! (on viral euphemization in the context of mass speech culture). In: Proceedings of the Institute of the Russian Language V. V. Vinogradova. Iss. 13. Culture of Russian speech. Moscow. 43—52. (In Russ.).
10. Ivanyan, E. P. (2019). For what shampoo in the novel “Monastery”, or about the world of verbal being. World of Science. Series: Sociology, Philology, Cultural Studies, 10 (4): 59. (In Russ.).
11. Ivanyan, E., Klyushina, A. (2021). The Use of the Phraseological Units with the Semantics of Extreme in Russian Discourse. In: Arsenteva, E. (ed.) The Discoursal Use of Phraseological Units. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 123—145.
12. Karaulov, Yu. N. (1976). General and Russian ideography. Moscow: Nauka. 356 p. (In Russ.).
13. Klyushina, A. M. (2020). The manifestation of the semantics of extremes in the personosphere of V. S. Vysotsky. In: Lekant's Readings: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Moscow: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy oblastnoy universitet. 247—250. (In Russ.).
14. Klyushina, A. M. (2021). F. M. Dostoevskiy’s novel “The Brothers Karamazov”: some means of the semantic extreme expression. Libri Magistri, 2 (16): 36—45. DOI 10.52172/2587-6945_2021_16_2_36. (In Russ.).
15. Kolesnikova, E. I. (2015). Experience in identifying gender features of the semantics of the word last. In: Psycholinguistics and lexicography. Voronezh: Istoki. Iss. 2. 193—197. (In Russ.).
16. Kolesov, V. V. (1988). Culture of speech — culture of behavior. Leningrad: Lenizdat. 234—235. (In Russ.).
17. Levontina, I. B. What has the Russian language become today? Iss. 1. Available at: https://foma.ru/kakim-stal-russkiy-yazyik-segodnya-chast.html (accessed 12.10.2021). (In Russ.).
18. Lyapon, M. V. (1986). The semantic structure of a complex sentence and text. On the typology of intratext relations. Moscow: Nauka. 201 p. (In Russ.).
19. Markova, E. M., Ratsiburskaya, L. V., Issers, O. S. (et al.). (2017). The role of the media in the democratization and creativity of the modern Russian language (round table). Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (electronic journal), 1. Available at: http://evestnikmgou.ru/en/Articles/Doc/799 (accessed 12.10.2021). (In Russ.).
20. Novikov, L. A. (1982). Semantics of the Russian language: textbook. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. 272 p. (In Russ.).
21. Novikova, L. I., Gribanskaya, E. E. (2016). Verbal lace, or norms of coordination and con-trol. Educational technologies, 3: 122—135. (In Russ.).
22. Rebrova, N. E. (2020). Lexicographic Status of Euphemisms as Language Means of Representation of Linguistic and Cultural Information (Based on the Material of English and German Languages): author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Yaroslavl. 23 p. (In Russ.).
23. Ryzhkov, V. A. (1988). Features of stereotyping, which must accompany the socialization of an individual within a certain national-cultural community. In: Linguistic con-sciousness: stereotypes and creativity. Moscow: IYaZ. 4—16. (In Russ.).
24. Sidorenko, A. V. (2020). Prohibition in the system of speech and folklore genres. Genres of speech, 2 (26): 100—109. (In Russ.).
25. Sirotinina, O. B. Speech culture. Available at: https://studfile.net/preview/4412665/ (ac-cessed 15.10.2021). (In Russ.).
26. Skovorodnikov, A. P. (2016). Ecology of the Russian language: monograph. Krasnoyarsk: Sib. feder. un-t. 388 p. (In Russ.).
27. Tudose, V. (2006). Features of Russian colloquial speech of the inhabitants of Moldova. Rusin, 2 (4): 168—184. (In Russ.).
28. Uspenskiy, L. V. (1962). Word about words. You and your name. Leningrad: Lenizdat. 636 p. (In Russ.).
29. Vezhbitskaya, A. (1997). Language. Culture. Cognition. Moscow. 412 p. (In Russ.).
30. Vilinbakhova, E. L. (2015). Materials for the course of lectures “Linguistic study of stereotypes”: teaching aid. St. Petersburg. 72 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ivanyan E.P., Klyushina A.M. ‘Posledniy’ [Last] vs ‘Krayniy’ [Latest] in Ontological Presentation. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(4):46-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-4-46-67