Semantic Motivation of Nominative Relatives as a Problem of Modern Lexicograph
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-5-9-25
Abstract
The question of the semantic motivation of denominative relatives — significant units in the prepositional function is raised in the article. The influence on the volume and structure of the lexical part of the meaning of denominative relatives and their adverbial homonyms of the same semes inherited from the deriving name is comprehended. Peculiarities of semantization of adverbial and prepositional meanings are considered on the examples of relatives as a result and bypassing. It is proved that the ambiguity of ideas about semantic motivation largely determines the non-systematic fixation of homonymous service and significant units in dictionaries: adverbs are interpreted mainly through only one synonym and do not have a descriptive component in the definition, while prepositions are characterized by more detailed descriptive-synonymous definitions, including at least two partial synonyms. The analysis of dictionary entries and materials of the National Corpus of the Russian allows us to conclude that denominative relatives have a more complexly organized lexical part of the meaning than homonymous adverbs with the same generating base. It has been established that with the expansion of the system of meanings of a service language unit, there is a simplification of the seme composition of each individual meaning.
About the Authors
N. A. Aksarina
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalya A. Aksarina,PhD in Philology, Associate Professor Department of Russian and General Linguistics
Tyumen
L. V. Basova
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Larisa V. Basova, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor Department of Russian and General Linguistics
Tyumen
References
1. Komarova, A. M. (2015). Once again about the status of the preposition. Scientific notes of Orel state university, 6 (69): 147—151. (In Russ.).
2. Kunygina, O. V. (2012). On the lexical and grammatical meaning of service words: theoretical aspect. Humanitarian researches, 4 (44): 63—67. (In Russ.).
3. Ledenev, Yu. I. (1964). On the boundaries and functions of the class of ambiguous words in Russian. In: Scientific notes of the Moscow Regional Pedagogical Institute. Moscow: Publishing house MRSU. 148 (10): 179—197. (In Russ.).
4. Lopatin, V. V. (1990). Lexicalization. In: Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. 258. (In Russ.).
5. Popova, Z. D. (1969). The system of case and prepositional case forms in the Russian literary language of the 17th century. Voronezh: Voronezh University Press. 183 p. (In Russ.).
6. Raevskaya, M. V. (2014). Theoretical problems in studying prepositions in Russian linguistics. Bulletin of the South Ural state university. Series: Linguistics, 2: 21—24. (In Russ.).
7. Seliverstova, O. N. (1999). Does the preposition have only grammatical meaning? Philology questions, 3: 26—33. (In Russ.).
8. Sheremet'eva, E. S. (2011). Problems of lexicographic representation of prepositional new word formation. The Humanities and social sciences, 4: 133—142. (In Russ.).
9. Shiganova, G. A. (2001). The system of lexical and phraseological prepositions in modern Russian: monograph. Chelyabinsk: Publishing house Chelyab. state ped. university. 454 p. (In Russ.).
10. Sultanbaeva, Kh. V. (2012). On the problem of service parts of speech in linguistics. Bulletin of the Bashkir University, 17 (1—1): 554—555. (In Russ.).
11. Tsoy, A. S. (2004). Preposition as a lexical unit of the Russian language and its reflection in the educational dictionary. Philological sciences, 4: 105—113. (In Russ.).
12. Vinogradov, V. V. (1972). Grammatical doctrine of the word. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. 616 p. (In Russ.).
13. Vsevolodova, M. V. (2011). To the question of operational methods of categorization of prepositional units. Moscow university philology bulletin, 3: 103—135. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Aksarina N.A., Basova L.V. Semantic Motivation of Nominative Relatives as a Problem of Modern Lexicograph. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(5):9-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-5-9-25
Views:
505
Email this article 