Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Radicalism and Reformism in Political Controversy Tories in Great Britain in First Third of 19th Century

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-5-445-462

Abstract

A radical and reformist discourse on the nature and limits of the “folk element” in the British political system in the first third of the 19th century is considered. The key features of this discourse and the role it played in shaping a broad Tory identity are studied. It is shown that during the period under study, the focus of political controversy shifted from issues of sovereignty and royal prerogative to issues related to fair popular representation and the nature of the necessary political reforms. The novelty of the study lies in the emphasis on the fact that it was the abuse of power by the “popular element” in the British constitutional system that was the main threat to sustainable development. This thesis is supported by documentary evidence, including those first introduced into scientific circulation. It is emphasized that the broad Tory identity that developed during the period under study was based on adherence to the ideals of the constitutional order, established as a result of the Glorious Revolution. The author’s assessment of how the various approaches of the Tory groups to the issue of reform eroded the broad identity of the Tories, creating a basis for the formation of political ideas of conservatism, is presented.

About the Authors

V. V. Klochkov
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation

Viktor V. Klochkov, Doctor of History, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, History and Political Science

Rostov-on-Don

ResearcherID B-4437-2019



V. S. Nazarova
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation

Veronika S. Nazarova, Senior Lecturer, Department of Sociology, History and Political Science

Rostov-on-Don



M. A. Ponomareva
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation

Maria A. Ponomareva, Doctor of History, Associate Professor, Department of National History of the XX—XXI centuries

Rostov-on-Don

ResearcherID M-1122-2016,

Scopus Author ID 6603544114



References

1. Austin, M. (1967). The Whigs in Opposition, 1815—1830. London: Long-man. 288 p.

2. Clark, J. C. D. (2000). English Society 1660—1832: Ideology, Social Structure and Political Practice During the Ancien Regime. London: Longman. 412 p. ISBN 0-521-66180-3.

3. Coley, L. (1982). In Defiance of Oligarchy: The Tory Party, 1714—1760. Cambridge: University Press. 386 p.

4. Gash, N. (1984). Lord Liverpool: the Life and Politic Career of Robert Banks Jenkinson, Second Earl of Liverpool, 1770—1828. London: Longman. 408 p.

5. Gunn, J. A. W. (1974). Influence, Parties and the Constitution: Changing Attitudes, 1783—1832. The Historical Journal, 17 (2): 320—327.

6. Hill, B. W. (1985). British Parliamentary Parties, 1742—1832: From the Fall of Walpole to the First Reform Act. London: Penguin. 316 p.

7. Hilton, B. (2006). A Mad, bad and Dangerous People? England, 1783—1846. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 782 p. ISBN 0-19-822830-9.

8. Klochkov, V. V., Nazarova, V. S. (2021). Origin of Sovereignty and Boundaries of Royal Prerogative in Tory Political Controversy in Great Britain in Last Third of 18th Century. Nauchnyi dialog, 9: 324—341. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-9-324-341. (In Russ.).

9. O’Gorman, F., Fraser, P. (1987). Party Politics in the Early Nineteenth Century (1815—1832). English Historical Review, 102 (402) (January): 54—71.

10. O’Gorman, F. (1997). The Long Eighteen Century: British Political and Social History, 1688—1832. London: Hodder & Stoughton. 438 p. ISBN 034056752X.

11. Poole, R. (2006). «By the Law or by the Sword»: Peterloo Revisited. History, 91 (302): 250—263.

12. Sack, J. (1993). From Jacobite to Conservative: Reaction and Orthodoxy in Britain, 1760—1832. Cambridge: University Press. 292 p. ISBN 0-521-43266-9.


Review

For citations:


Klochkov V.V., Nazarova V.S., Ponomareva M.A. Radicalism and Reformism in Political Controversy Tories in Great Britain in First Third of 19th Century. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(5):445-462. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-5-445-462

Views: 467


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)