Relationship between Lords and Gentry in England in Second Half of 15th Century in Context of ‘Bastard Feudalism’ Concept: a Prosopographic Analysis
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-6-488-504
Abstract
“Bastard feudalism” is a system of patronage-client relations that existed in England in the late Middle Ages, opposed to the vassal-seigneurial relations of classical feudalism. This concept has been used in historiography since the 19th century, but is still debatable. The relevance of the study is due to the question of the degree of “bastard feudalism” relations distribution in society. Based on the sources, a prosopographic database of active participants in the Wars of the Roses (1455–1487) was formed, a significant part of which were secular lords and representatives of the middle and lower nobility (gentry): knights, squires and gentlemen. The retinues of the lords had a motley social composition, but, as a rule, included precisely the nobles. Analysis of the database showed that at least 16 % of the representatives of the gentry were in the service or were part of the entourage of the lords who supported the Lancasters or Yorks. Most of the gentry did not belong to the retinue of the lords, but were dependent on them and were recruited into military service in cases of aggravation of the socio-political conflict.
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project number 22-28-00190
About the Author
A. G. Prazdnikov
Vyatka State Agrotechnological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrei G. Prazdnikov - Doctor of History, Associate Professor, Department of History and Philosophy.
Kirov
References
1. Beech, G. (1992). Prosopography. In: Medieval studies: an introduction. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. 185—226.
2. Booth, P. W. N. (1997). Landed Society in Cumberland and Westmorland, c. 1440—1485. In: The Politics of the Wars of the Roses. Leicester: [b. i.]. 288 р.
3. Burley, P., Elliott, M., Watson, H. (2007). The Battles of St Albans. Pen & Sword. 182 р.
4. Carpenter, C. (1992). Locality and Polity: A Study of Warwickshire Landed Society, 1401—1499. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 295 p.
5. Dunham, W. (1955). Lord Hastings’ Indentured Retainers 1461—1483. New Haven: Yale University Press. 175 р.
6. Feasts, A. G. (2020). Prosopographic database of participants in the battles of the Wars of the Roses. Bulletin of the North-Eastern State University. History, 1 (3): 37—47. (In Russ.).
7. Griffiths, R. A. (1981). The Reign of King Henry VI. Berkeley: Ernest Benn. 968 p.
8. Griffiths, R. A. (1991). King and Country: England and Wales in the Fifteenth Century. London: Hambledon Press. 408 р.
9. Griffiths, R. A., Thomas, R. S. (1997). The formation of the Tudor dynasty. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix. 320 p. (In Russ.).
10. Hicks, M. (2013). Bastard Feudalism. London, New-York: Routledge. XII, 243 p.
11. Hicks, M. (2002). English Political Culture in the Fifteenth Century. London, New York: Routledge. 261 p.
12. Hicks, M. (1991). Richard III and His Rivals: Magnates and Their Motives in the War of the Roses. London and Rio Grande: Hambledon Press. 447 p.
13. Hicks, M. (1998). Warwick the Kingmaker. Oxford: Blackwell. xv, 346 p.
14. Hicks, M. (1991). The 1468 Statute of Livery. Historical Research, 64 (153): 15—28.
15. Holidays, A. G. (2020). To the question of “bastard feudalism”. Middle Ages, 81 (1): 72—78. DOI: 10.7868/S0131878020010080. (In Russ.).
16. Hookham, M. A. (1872). The life and times of Margaret of Anjou, queen of England and France, 1. London: Tinsley brothers. 436 р.
17. Horrox, R. (1991). Richard III: A Study of Service. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 364 p.
18. Johnson, P. A. (1988). Duke Richard of York 1411—1460. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 270 р.
19. Jones, M., Walker, S. (eds.). (1994). Private Indentures for Life Service in Peace and War 1278—1476. Camden Fifth Series, 3: 190.
20. Lander, J. R. (1976). Crown and Nobility. 1450—1509. London: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 340 p.
21. Mackman, J. S. (1999). The Lincolnshire Gentry and the Wars of the Roses. University of York. 333 p.
22. McFarlane, K. B. (1981). «Bastard Feudalism». In: England in the Fifteenth Century. London: Hambledon Press. 23—44.
23. McKelvie, G. (2020). Bastard Feudalism, English Society and the Law: The Statutes of Livery, 1390—1520. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer. 236 р.
24. Pollard, A. J. The Northern Retainers of Richard Nevill, Earl of Salisbury. Northern History, 11 (1975—1976): 52—69.
25. Rawcliffe, C. (1978). The Staffords, earls of Stafford and dukes of Buckingham, 1394—1521. Cambridge, London, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. 280 p.
26. Ross, C. D. (1974). Edward IV. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press. XVI, 479 p.
27. Ross, J. (2011). John de Vere, Thirteenth Earl of Oxford, 1442—1513: ‘The Foremost Man of the Kingdom’. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer. 294 p.
28. Ross, J. (2018). The English Aristocracy and Mesne Feudalism in the Late Middle Ages. English Historical Review, 133 (564): 1027—1059. DOI: 10.1093/ehr/cey275.
29. Rowney, I. The Hastings Affinity in Staffordshire and the Honour of Tutbury / I. Rowney // Historical Research. — 1984. — Vol. 57. — Issue 135. — Рp. 35—45.
30. Storey, R. L. English officers of state, 1399—1485 / R. L. Storey // Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research. — 1958. — XXXI. — Рp. 89—92.
31. Storey, R. L. (1957). The wardens of the marches of England towards Scotland 1377—1489. English Historical Review, 72 (285): 593—615.
32. Storey, R. L. (1966). The End of the House of Lancaster. Manchester: Stein and Day. 278 p.
33. Thomson, J. A. F. (1972). The Courtenay Family in the Yorkist Period. Historical Research, 45 (112): 230—246.
34. Wedgwood, J., Holt, A. (1936). History of Parliament. Biographies of the Members of the Commons House, 1439—1509. London: Her Britannic Majestry’s Stationery Office. 666 р.
Review
For citations:
Prazdnikov A.G. Relationship between Lords and Gentry in England in Second Half of 15th Century in Context of ‘Bastard Feudalism’ Concept: a Prosopographic Analysis. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(6):488-504. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-6-488-504
Views:
413
Email this article 