Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Formation of Terminological System of Moral Philosophy in Works of John Locke: Innovation and Tribute to Tradition

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-8-92-120

Abstract

The formation of ideas about the phenomenon of morality and moral responsibility in the works of the English thinker John Locke is considered. Two of his works served as the material: “Essay Concerning Human Understanding” and “Two Treatises of Government”. On the basis of philological methods, conceptual and discursive types of analysis, as well as procedures used in corpus studies, it was proved that the vocabulary of describing morality and moral responsibility in English was formed by the end of the 17th century and John Locke played a huge role in this process. Although the linguistic means of describing the categories of morality were based on the discussions of thinkers of previous eras, Locke made an attempt to rethink the existing vocabulary in order to create an integral system of concepts and terminological framework of moral philosophy. The novelty of the study is seen in the fact that for the first time a complex methodology for analyzing Locke’s texts was used with quantitative methods and a thorough study of the previous cultural and historical context. The key lexical units in Locke’s texts, as well as in publications of the previous two centuries, have been studied. It is proved that the moral and ethical philosophical discourse of the scientist was formed on the basis of the vocabulary of religious discourse and partially philosophical discourse, as well as neutral words that were not associated with any discourse.

About the Authors

A. A. Sharapkova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Anastasia A. Sharapkova - PhD in Philology.

Moscow



L. A. Manerko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Larissa A. Manerko - Doctor of Philology, Professor.

Moscow



References

1. An Antidote or Soveraigne Remedie against the pestiferous writings of all English sectaries. And in particuler against D. Whitaker, D. Fulke, D. Bilson, D. Reynolds, D. Sparkes and D. Field, the chiefe upholders, some of Protestancy, some of Puritanisme. Devided into three Partes With special reference to “The True Difference between Christian Subjection and Unchristian Rebellion”. (1622). 1, 2. Available at: https://www.google.ru/books/edition/An_Antidote_or_Soveraigne_Remedie_agains/5-xiAAAAcAAJ?hl=ru&gbpv=0 (accessed 01.03.2022).

2. Apresyan, R. G. (2006). Ethical problems in the “Experience of Human Understanding” by J. Locke. In: Historical and Philosophical yearbook. Moscow: Nauka. 132—152. ISBN 5-02-033856-7. (In Russ.).

3. Arakin, V. D. (2001). History of the English language: textbook. Moscow: Fizmatlit. 272 p. ISBN 5-9221-0032-7. (In Russ.).

4. Ashcraft, R. (1991). John Locke: Critical Assessments. London: Routledge. 715 p. ISBN 0415008476.

5. Benvenist, E. (1995). Dictionary of Indo-European social terms. Moscow: Progress-University. 456 p. ISBN 5-01-003860-9. (In Russ.).

6. Cavarero, A. (2016). Inclinations. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 208 p. ISBN 9781503600409.

7. Cranston, M. (1957). John Locke. A Biography. London: Longmans. 496 p. ISBN 978-0-1928-3044-9.

8. Cudworth, R. (1996). A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 218 p. ISBN 0521473624.

9. Do Vale, F. (2018). Anselm on the Rectus Ordus of Creation. Saint Anselm Journal, 14 (1): 93—109.

10. Ducheyene, S. (2009). ‘Newtonian’ Elements in Locke, Hume, or: How far can one stretch a label? Enlightenment and Dissent, 25: 62—105.

11. Durham, J. (1677). The Law Unsealed: Or, a Practical Exposition of the Ten Commandments, with a Resolution of Several Momentous Questions and Cases of Conscience. Fifth Edition, to which are Prefixed the Commendatory Epistles of Dr Owen and Mr Jenkyn. Available at: https://www.google.ru/books/edition/The_Law_Unsealed_Or_a_Practical_Expositi/Be4G1rm9-jIC? hl=ru&gbpv=0 (accessed 01.03.2022).

12. Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory: 1930—1955. In: Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. 1—32. ISBN 0631113002.

13. Flanagan, О. (1991). Varieties of moral personality: Ethics and psychological realism. Cam-bridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 393 p. ISBN 0674932188.

14. Forster, A. (1972). The Real Roger Widdrington. Recusant History, 11 (4): 196—205. DOI: 10.1017/S0034193200033021.

15. Gale, Th. (1672). The Court of the Gentiles Or a Discours Touching the Original of Human Literature, Both Philologie and Philosophie, from the Scriptures & Jewish Church. Available at: https://www.google.ru/books/edition/The_Court_of_the_Gentiles/nnBJCHZjzXMC?hl=ru&gbpv=1&dq=The+Court+of+the+Gentiles+Or+a+Discours+Touching+the+Original+of+Human+Literature&printsec=frontcover (accessed 01.03.2022).

16. Gibbes, Ch. (1677). XXXI. Sermons ... upon several subjects and occasions”. Available at: https://www.google.ru/books/edition/XXXI_Sermons_upon_several_subjects_and_o/B6qc3rAYjYAC?hl=ru&gbpv=1&dq=Sermons+...+upon+several+subjects+and+occasions%E2%80%9D+(1677)&pg=PA154&printsec=frontcover (accessed 01.03.2022).

17. Google Books. Available at: https://books.google.com (accessed 01.03.2022).

18. Graddol, D., Leith, D., Swann, J. (1997). English: history, diversity and change. London, New York: Routledge. 394 p. ISBN 0415131170.

19. Groulier, J. F., Brugère, F. (2015). Beauty. In: Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press. 79—89. ISBN 1400849918.

20. Guryevskaya, L. A. (2006). Cognition and morality in the philosophy of John Locke. PhD Diss. Moscow. 168 p. (In Russ.).

21. Hargreaves-Mawdsley, W. N. (1973). Oxford in the Age of John Locke, 32. Norman: Univer-sity of Oklahoma Press. 132 p. ISBN 0806110384.

22. Hobbes, T. (2017). Leviathan. Moscow: RIPOL classic. 672 p. ISBN 978-5-386-09900-8. (In Russ.).

23. Johnson, M. (2018). The Aesthetics of Meaning and Thought: The bodily roots of philosophy, science, morality, and art. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 293 p. ISBN 9780226538808.

24. Komova, T. A., Sharapkova, A. A. (2017). The conceptual and semantic shift of “noble” and its synonyms as a case of semiosis. Lege Artis. Language yesterday, today, tomor-row, 2 (2): 95—147. DOI: 10.1515/lart-2017-0014.

25. Kuczynski, M. P. (2016). Preface: “...Beatus vitres techyng”. In: Prophetic Song: The Psalms as Moral Discourse in Late Medieval England. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. XV—XXVI. ISBN 9781512803310.

26. Loginov, E. V. (2020). Is identity of personality a condition of moral responsibility? Philo-sophical Journal, 13 (2): 173—184. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2020-13-2-173-184. (In Russ.).

27. Lemetti, J. (2011). Historical dictionary of Hobbes’s philosophy. Lanham, Toronto, Plymouth: Scarecrow Press. 405 p. ISBN 0810850656.

28. Malinowski, B. (1935). Coral Gardens and Their Magic. Available at: http://www.archive.org/stream/coralgardensandt031834mbp/coralgardensandt 031834mbp_djvu.txt (accessed 01.03.2022).

29. Manerko, L. A. (1993). The use of computer processing during the distributive-valence analysis of complex names of artifacts (based on the technical vocabulary of modern Eng-lish). In: English lexicon in aspects of interlanguage and intercultural classifica-tion, 410. Moscow: MGLU Publishing House. 112—121. (In Russ.).

30. Manerko, L. A. (2001). Development of valence theory in connection with the use of computer technologies. In: Materials of the International Conference dedicated to the scientific heritage of Prof. M. D. Stepanova and her further development (To the 100th anniversary of her birth). Moscow: MGLU Publishing House. 92—95. (In Russ.).

31. Marshall, J. (1994). John Locke: Resistance, Religion and Responsibility. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press. 485 p. ISBN 0521466873.

32. Middle English dictionary. Available at: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/dictionary (accessed 01.03.2022).

33. Oxford English dictionary. Electronic version: 4.0.0.1. CD ROM.

34. Prolegomena to moral responsibility. (2020). Date compote, 15: Moral responsibility. 3—100. DOI: 10.24412/2587-9308-2020-15-3-100. (In Russ.).

35. Rimell, V. (2017). Philosophy’s Folds: Seneca, Cavarero, and the History of Rectitude. Hypa-tia, 32 (4): 768—783. DOI: 10.1111/hypa.12361.

36. Robertson, J. (2005). The case for the Enlightenment: Scotland and Naples 1680—1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 455 p. ISBN 978-0-521-84787-2.

37. Rush, B. (1951). Rush to Elias Boudinot? Observations on the Federal Procession in Phila-delphia, July 9th, 1788. In Letters of Benjamin Rush, 1. 1761—1792. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 470—477.

38. Rychlý, P. (2008). A Lexicographer-Friendly Association Score. RASLAN. 6—9.

39. Salkeld, J. (1617). A Treatise of Paradise, and the Principal Contents Thereof. Especially of the Greatness, Situation, Beautie, and Other Properties of that Place ... Collected Out of the Holy Scripture, Ancient Fathers, and Other Both Ancient and Moderne Writers. Available at: https://www.google.ru/books/edition/A_Treatise_of_Paradise_and_the_Principal/mFI7AQAAMAAJ?hl=ru&gbpv=0 (accessed 01.03.2022).

40. Schneewind, J. B. (1994). Locke’s Moral Philosophy. In: The Cambridge Companion to Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 199—225. DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521383714.009.

41. Schuurman, P. (2003). Willem Jacob’s Gravesande’s Philosophical Defence of Newtonian Physics: On the Various Uses of Locke. In: The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives. London: Routledge. 43—57. ISBN 0-415-31446-1.

42. Sepir, E. (1993). Selected works on linguistics and cultural studies. Moscow: Progress, Uni-versity. 656 p. ISBN 5-01-002079-3. (In Russ.).

43. Shapiro, L. (2006). Instrumental or Immersed Experience: Pleasure, Pain and Object Percep-tion in Locke. In: The Body as Object and Instrument of Knowledge: Embodied Em-piricism in Early Modern Science. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer. 265—285. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3686-5.

44. Sharapkova, A., Loginov, E., Manerko, L. (2019). Conceptualizing the mental sphere in dis-course : From Enlightenment philosophy to Mark Twain. Lege artis. Language yester-day, today, tomorrow, 4 (1): 170—240.

45. Sketch Engine. Available at: http://www.sketchengine.co.uk (accessed 01.03.2022).

46. Solopova, M. A. (2020). Aristotle’s Treatise “On Youth and Old age, life and Death” as an essay of the Parva naturalia series. Historical and Philosophical Yearbook, 35: 31—52. DOI: 10.21267/AQUILO.2020.47.21.001. (In Russ.).

47. Taratuta, E. E. (2007). Philosophy of virtual reality. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Uni-versity Publishing House. 147 p. ISBN 978-5288-04291-1. (In Russ.).

48. Tsaregorodtsev, A. V. (2009). On some aspects of the evolution of English Protestantism in the XVI — mid — XIX century through the prism of the problem of the formation of bourgeois ethos. Bulletin of ChelSU, 12: 99—108. (In Russ.).

49. The Cambridge History of the English language. English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development, 5. (1992). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 686 p. ISBN 0521264782.

50. The Middle Way of Predetermination Asserted. Between the Dominicans and Jesuites, Calvin-ists and Arminians. Or, a Scriptural Enquiry Into the Influence and Causation of God, in and Unto Humane Actions; Especially Such as are Sinfull; Signed: W. M. With an Epistle to the Reader Signed: Rich. Baxter. (1679). Available at: https://www.google.ru/books/edition/The_Middle_Way_of_Predetermination_Asser/oYtmAAAAcAAJ?hl=ru&gbpv=0 (accessed 01.03.2022).

51. Wermser, R. (1976). Statistische Studien zur Entwicklung des englischen Wortschatzes. Bern: Francke. 141 p. (In Germ.).

52. Widdrington, R. (1613). A Theologicall Disputation concerning the Oath of Allegiance ... Translated out of Latin into English by the Author himselfe, whereunto hee hath added an Appendix, etc. Available at: https://www.google.ru/books/edition/A_Theologicall_Disputation_concerning_th/hCpkAAAAcAAJ?hl=ru&gbpv=1&dq=%C2%ABA+Theologicall+Disputation+concerning+the+Oath+of+Allegiance%C2%BB+(1613)&pg=PA19&printsec=frontcover (ac-cessed 01.03.2022).

53. Wierzbicka, A. (2007). Moral sense. Journal of social, evolutionary, and cultural psycholo-gy, 1 (3): 66—85. DOI: 10.1037/h0099824.

54. Zakharov, V. P., Khokhlova, M. V. (2014). Isolation of terminological phrases from special texts based on various measures of association. Technologies of the information society in science, education and culture: a collection of scientific articles: Proceedings of the XVII All-Russian Joint Conference “Internet and Modern Society” (IMS-2014), St. Petersburg, November 19-20, 2014. St. Petersburg: ITMO University. 290—293. Available at: http://ojs.itmo.ru/index.php/IMS/article/view/268/264 (accessed 01.03.2022). (In Russ.).

55. Zudilina, N. V. (2020). On the four reasons for the existence of “Platonic” and “Aristotelian” meanings of the concept of “virtual”. Philosophical Sciences, 63 (4): 84—98. DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-4-84-98. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Sharapkova A.A., Manerko L.A. Formation of Terminological System of Moral Philosophy in Works of John Locke: Innovation and Tribute to Tradition. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(8):92-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-8-92-120

Views: 478


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)