Conflict in Linguistic Researches
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-1-45-68
Abstract
An overview of domestic publications on conflictology in the field of linguistics is provided in the article. A quantitative analysis of linguistic works on the problem of conflict from 1990 to 2022 is carried out. The linguistic features of the study of conflict in dissertations, monographs, articles and textbooks are evaluated. Leading research methods: bibliometric analysis, publication method, classification method. The relevance of the study is related to the objective need to understand conflicts in different areas of scientific knowledge, as well as the need to study the contribution of the philological sciences to the development of modern conflictology. Monitoring of linguistic works on conflict shows that linguistics is beginning to take a strong place in the theory of conflictology. The analysis of bibliographic information allows us to characterize the main directions of the problem of conflict study in linguistics: contradictions in language and speech, conflict of language norms, conceptual essence of the conflict phenomenon, verbalization of the concept CONFLICT, objectification of reality conflicts in texts, language markers of conflict potential, destructive practices of conflict, ways of communication optimization, legal dimension of linguistic conflict, linguistic ways of conflict prevention. The author’s diversification of linguistic works by types of conflict is presented in the article.
Keywords
About the Author
A. S. Kinderknekht
Perm State Agro-Technological University named after Academician D. N. Pryanishnikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna S. Kinderknekht, PhD in Philology, associate professor, Department of Foreign Languages
Perm
References
1. Abolin, B. I. (2009). The concept of “tolerance” in the cognitive-discursive aspect. PhD Diss. Yekaterinburg. 229 p. (In Russ.).
2. Akhmetgareeva, O. F., Sidorova, N. A. (2022). Fundamentals of linguoconflictology: textbook. Moscow: Nauka Segodnya Publishing House. 102 p. ISBN 978-5-6045147-1-9. (In Russ.).
3. Alpatov, V. M. (2011). The norm of language and the conflict of norms in Japan. In: Conflict in language and communication: collection of articles. Moscow: RSUH. 227—240. ISBN 978-5-7281-1195-5. (In Russ.).
4. Alyoshina, E. Y. (2015). Public political discourse of a conflict situation. Moscow: Prometheus. 220 p. ISBN 978-5-9907453-5-3.
5. Alyoshina, E. Y. (2022). Public political speech in a conflict situation (based on the material of the English language). Doct. Diss. Moscow. 351 p. (In Russ.).
6. Anisimova, A. T. (2004). Linguistic projections of conflict (descriptive aspect). PhD Diss. Krasnodar. 212 p. (In Russ.).
7. Antonova, T. G. (2018). Metaphorical modeling of social conflict in media discourse: factors and aspects of variability. PhD Diss. Tomsk. 330 p. (In Russ.).
8. Antsupov, A. Ya. (2008). Conflictology: textbook for universities. 3rd ed. St. Petersburg: Peter. 496 p. ISBN 978-5-496-01605-6. (In Russ.).
9. Balabas, N. N. (2010). Concepts “amitié” (friendship) and “hostilité” (enmity) in French. PhD Diss. Moscow. 153 p. (In Russ.).
10. Baraeva, O. G. (2009). Conceptualization of the concept of “conflict” in the Russian national picture of the world of the second half of the XX century. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Krasnodar. 26 p. (In Russ.).
11. Belous, N. A. (2008). Conflict discourse in the communicative space: semantic and pragmatic aspects. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Krasnodar. 50 p. (In Russ.).
12. Belous, N. A. (2007). Structural and semantic aspects of conflict discourse in the communicative space. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 246 p. ISBN 978-5-88866-294-6. (In Russ.).
13. Boeva-Omelechko, N. B., Sadovnikova, Ya. A. (2020). Means of conflict deintensification in modern English: monograph. Rostov-on-Don-Taganrog: Southern Federal University. 130 p. ISBN 978-5-9275-3525-5. (In Russ.).
14. Bogatyreva, S. N. (2009). Diachronic aspect of the concept of “tolerance” in different linguistic cultures (based on the material of Spanish and Russian languages). PhD Diss. Pyatigorsk. 213 p. (In Russ.).
15. Bogdanova, A. G. (2011). Comparative analysis of structures and methods of verbalization of the concepts “politeness” and “Höflichkeit” in Russian and German language pictures of the world. PhD Diss. Novosibirsk. 168 p. (In Russ.).
16. Boginskaya, O. A. (2020). Theory of discursive interaction in the conditions of asymmetry of knowledge and power. Doct. Diss. Maykop. 383 p. (In Russ.).
17. Borodko, D. A. (2012). Representation of the concept of “armed conflict” in German-language discourse (based on the material of Internet news discourse). Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Pyatigorsk. 24 p. (In Russ.).
18. Cheremokhina, D. A. (2015). Cognitive-pragmatic factors of inter-course conflict: the discourse of power and the discourse of V. S. Vysotsky. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Belgorod. 22 p. (In Russ.).
19. Conflict in language and communication: collection of articles. (2011). Moscow: RSUH. 534 p. ISBN 978-5-7281-1195-5. (In Russ.).
20. Dadyan, S. R. (2012). Conflict dialogue in a work of fiction: based on the material of English—language fiction of the XX — beginning of the XXI century. PhD Diss. Ros-tov-on-Don. 179 p. (In Russ.).
21. Dolgova, I. A. (2006). The conceptual field of “patience” in English and Russian linguocultures. PhD Diss. Volgograd. 205 p. (In Russ.).
22. Erdyneeva, D. V. (2004). Semantic conflict of species-temporal meanings in a compound sentence with a subordinate tense in modern French. PhD Diss. Irkutsk. 155 p. (In Russ.).
23. Ermolaeva, E. N. (2005). The concept of CONFLICT and its objectification in the lexico-semantic space of the modern English language. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Irkutsk. 21 p. (In Russ.).
24. Ershova, V. E. (2013). Speech interaction in conflict conditions: a situational approach based on the material of talk shows and TV debates. PhD Diss. Tomsk. 201 p. (In Russ.).
25. Furmenkova, T. V. (2005). Means of implementing the principle of politeness in the American version of modern English (on the example of speech acts of address, re-quest, greeting). PhD Diss. Kaliningrad. 305 p. (In Russ.).
26. Ganeev, B. T. (2004). Contradictions in language and speech. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Ufa. 39 p. (In Russ.).
27. Gazizov, R. A. (2011). The communicative category of politeness in German linguoculture. Doct. Diss. Ufa. 395 p. (In Russ.).
28. Gazizulina, L. R. (2013). The implementation of the concepts of “violence” and “vio-lence” in didactic texts of school literature (based on the material of the Russian language and the American version of English). PhD Diss. Kazan. 215 p. (In Russ.).
29. Golev, N. D., Obelyunas, N. V. (2014). Linguoconflictology, or linguistic conflictology. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University. 279—280. (In Russ.).
30. Golev, N. D. (2008). The legitimization of language conflicts as the basis of their typology. Kemerovo, Barnaul: Altai University Press. 136—155. (In Russ.).
31. Gorbacheva, E. N. (2006). Dispute as a linguocultural concept. PhD Diss. Astrakhan. 240 p. (In Russ.).
32. Gulakova, I. I. (2004). Communicative strategies and tactics of speech behavior in a conflict situation of communication. PhD Diss. Eagle. 152 p. (In Russ.).
33. Gurdjian, N. S. (2008). Speech manifestations of cognitive conflict in dialogue: based on the material of English and Russian languages. PhD Diss. Pyatigorsk. 198 p. (In Russ.).
34. Hilalova, N. G. (2004). Functional and pragmatic aspect of blocking concessions in the context of everyday conflict discourse in modern German. PhD Diss. Irkutsk. 211 p. (In Russ.).
35. Ivanova, D. V. (2010). Speech ways of overcoming conflict: on the material of the Rus-sian and English languages. PhD Diss. Saratov. 182 p. (In Russ.).
36. Kara-Murza, E. S. (2014). Linguoconflictology as a direction in the spirit of language ecology. Ecology of language and communicative practice, 2: 55—68. (In Russ.).
37. Karasia, N. A. (2004). Pragmalinguistic study of the act of reproach in the context of modern American speech culture. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. 21 p. (In Russ.).
38. Karasia, N. A. (2013). Pragmatics of interpersonal conflict (based on the material of speech interaction of representatives of modern American society). Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky: KamSU im. Vitus Bering. 104 p. ISBN 978-5-7968-0514-5. (In Russ.).
39. Khromenkov, P. N. (2017). Linguopragmatics of conflict (research by quantitative con-tent analysis). Doct. Diss. Moscow. 405 p. (In Russ.).
40. Kinderknecht, A. S. (2016). Quantitative analysis of domestic publications on conflictology in the field of linguistics. Scientific Almanac, 6—1 (19): 589—592. DOI: 10.17117/na.2016.06.01.589. (In Russ.).
41. Komalova, L. R. (2016). Interpersonal communication: from conflict to consensus. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Acade-my of Sciences. 180 p. ISBN 978-5-248-00804-9. (In Russ.).
42. Koshkarova, N. N. (2015). Conflict and cooperative types of Russian-language discourse in the intercultural political space. Author’s abstract of Doct.Diss. Yekaterin-burg. 47 p. (In Russ.).
43. Koshkarova, N. N. (2009). Conflict discourse: psychological and linguistic aspects. Chelyabinsk: SUSU: Gubernia. 175 p. ISBN 978-5-91463-011-6. (In Russ.).
44. Koshkarova, N. N. (2013). Conflict VS cooperative discourse in political communication. Chelyabinsk: SIMARS. 268 p. ISBN 978-5-903968-19-0. (In Russ.).
45. Krasnova, T. I. (2015). The phenomenon of oppositivity of the newspaper discourse of the Russian abroad: 1917—1920(22). Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Yekaterinburg. 41 p. (In Russ.).
46. Kusov, G. V. (2004). Insult as an illocutionary linguocultural concept. PhD Diss. Kras-nodar. 245 p. (In Russ.).
47. Language and conflict: a textbook for graduate students studying in the direction of “Linguistics”. (2014). Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House. 77 p. ISBN 978-5-7996-1370-9. (In Russ.).
48. Languages of neighbors: bridges or barriers? Problems of bilingual communication: a collection of articles. (2011). St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the European University in St. Petersburg. 308 p. ISBN 978-5-94380-125-9. (In Russ.).
49. Larina, S. G. (2014). The situation of conflict and its reflection in internal speech (based on the material of English—language fiction of the XIX—XX centuries. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Moscow. 23 p. (In Russ.).
50. Leonov, N. I. (2002). Ontological essence of conflicts. Moscow: MPSI, MODEK. 27—36. (In Russ.).
51. Logical analysis of language: inconsistency and anomaly of the text: collection of articles. (1990). Moscow: Nauka. 280 p. (In Russ.).
52. Luntsova, O. M. (2007). Gradient-concept “friendship-peace-enmity” in Russian and English linguocultures (based on vocabulary and phraseology). PhD Diss. Magnitogorsk. 260 p. (In Russ.).
53. Lyashenko, I. V. (2003). Linguistic essence and pragmatic functions of ethnic nicknames (based on the material of the English language). PhD Diss. Pyatigorsk. 207 p. (In Russ.).
54. Makarenko, G. S. (2018). Conflict text as an object of linguistic research: structuralsemantic and pragmatic aspects. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Ufa. 24 p. (In Russ.).
55. Martynova, E. M. (2017). Nonverbal aspect of abnormal communication. PhD Diss. Belgorod. 407 p. (In Russ.).
56. Maslova, V. A. (2008). Modern trends in linguistics: studies. manual for students. higher. studies. Institutions. Moscow: Publishing Center “Academy”. 272 p. ISBN 978-5-7695-4385-2. (In Russ.).
57. Matveeva, O. N. (2004). Functioning of conflict texts in the legal sphere and features of its linguistic study. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Barnaul. 20 p. (In Russ.).
58. Merkulova, E. M. (2013). Linguistic means of representing the parties to the military conflict in American and Russian discourses (based on official texts). PhD Diss. Moscow. 214 p. (In Russ.).
59. Midova, D. H. (2012). Tolerance as a linguocultural phenomenon. PhD Diss. Nalchik. 158 p. (In Russ.).
60. Mikhaylova, O. A., Mikhaylova, Yu. N., Shalina, I. V. (2022). Speech conflict and communicative scenarios of its harmonization: an educational and methodological manual. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House. 136 p. ISBN 978-5-7996-3479-7. (In Russ.).
61. Mulkeeva, V. O. (2005). Speech strategies of conflict and factors influencing their choice. PhD Diss. St. Petersburg. 190 p. (In Russ.).
62. Muravyeva, N. V. (2002). Speech mechanisms of communicative conflicts (based on the material of mass media texts). Doct. Diss. Moscow. 451 p. (In Russ.).
63. Nechaeva, V. S. (2015). Cognitive conflict in German-language electronic business correspondence. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Moscow. 24 p. (In Russ.).
64. Nepkusheva, T. S. (2006a). Intrapersonal conflict as a linguistic phenomenon. Krasnodar: FGOU VPO “Kuban State Agrarian University”. 415 p. ISBN 5-94672-216-6. (In Russ.).
65. Nepkusheva, T. S. (2006b). Intrapersonal conflict as a linguistic phenomenon. Doct. Diss. Krasnodar. 410 p. (In Russ.).
66. Nepkusheva, T. S. (2015). Linguistics of intrapersonal conflict. Saarbrucken: Palmarium Academic Publishing. 397 p. (In Russ.).
67. Nerovnaya, N. A. (2009). National specificity of lexical and phraseological objectification of concepts similar in content (based on the concepts “tolerance”, “tolerance” in Russian and English language consciousness). PhD Diss. Voronezh. 251 p. (In Russ.).
68. Niktovenko, E. Yu. (2015). Semantics of conflict-containing paroemias and aphorisms in linguocognitive and linguocultural aspects (based on the material of Russian and English languages). PhD Diss. Nalchik. 185 p. (In Russ.).
69. Novgorodova, E. V. (2021). Conflict of interpretations as a cognitive basis of linguoconflictology (based on the material of everyday political comments). Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University. 197 p. ISBN 978-5-8353-2853-6. (In Russ.).
70. Obelyunas, N. V. (2012). Conflict of interpretations of texts in the aspect of opposition of event and evaluation information (based on the texts of Russian media). Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Kemerovo. 24 p. (In Russ.).
71. Ostyakova, G. A. (2013). Representation of the concept of “politeness” in the ideolects of A. P. Chekhov and Guy de Maupassant. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Tyumen. 25 p. (In Russ.).
72. Pasechnikova, I. P. (2009). Conceptualization of war and peace in modern German (based on the material of the periodical press). PhD Diss. Tambov. 226 p. (In Russ.).
73. Petelenkova, M. G. (2004). Conflict of etymological and denotative meaning. PhD Diss. Moscow. 327 p. (In Russ.).
74. Plotnikova, A. M. (2017). Conflict communication in the aspect of forensic linguistics. Yekaterinburg; Moscow: TXT. 197 p. ISBN 978-5-7584-0269-6. (In Russ.).
75. Polkanova, A. A. (2010). The concept of “conflict” in linguistics: basic approaches to its study. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University, 5 (584): 200—208. (In Russ.).
76. Rastatueva, S. G. (2008). Representation of the concept of “tolerance” in the Russian language. PhD Diss. Tula. 180 p. (In Russ.).
77. Rogova, U. I. (2009). Experience of implementing conflictological knowledge in the framework of corporate training. Conflictology, 3: 107—110. (In Russ.).
78. Romanov, A. S. (2021). Stereotyping of subcultural constants in the axiology of the socio-group dialect (based on the values and realities of military service in the linguistic culture of the USA). Doct. Diss. Moscow. 447 p. (In Russ.).
79. Ruchkina, E. M. (2009). Linguistic-argumentative features of politeness strategies in speech conflict (based on the material of pedagogical discourse). Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Tver. 21 p. (In Russ.).
80. Rudov, P. A. (2005). Informative dialogue of the conflict type: structural-semantic and communicative-pragmatic aspects. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Novosibirsk. 19 p. (In Russ.).
81. Rychkova, T. A. (2019). Analysis of the conflict Russian-language text: approaches and methods: textbook. Stavropol: Logos Scientific Knowledge Center. 157 p. ISBN 978-5-907078-71-0. (In Russ.).
82. Saunders, G. G. (2019). Sustainable dialogue in conflicts: transformations and changes: textbook. Moscow: Aspect Press Publishing House. 382 p. ISBN 978-5-7567-0999-5. (In Russ.).
83. Savoyskaya, N. P. (2005). Linguoculturological features of the concept of “politeness” (based on the Kazakh, Russian and English languages). PhD Diss. Chelyabinsk. 186 p. (In Russ.).
84. Seyranyan, M. Yu. (2012). Conflict discourse: sociolinguistic and pragmalinguistic as-pects. Moscow: Prometheus. 93 p. (In Russ.).
85. Seyranyan, M. Yu. (2016). Conflicting political discourse and its prosodic realization. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Moscow. 40 p. (In Russ.).
86. Shamsutdinova, E. Y. (2006). Tolerance as a communicative category (linguistic and linguodidactic aspect). PhD Diss. Moscow. 261 p. (In Russ.).
87. Shustova, S. V. (2018). Migration linguistics and migration discourse. Theoretical and applied linguistics, 4 (2): 114—125. (In Russ.).
88. Shustova, S. V. (2019). Migration linguistics: formation and development. Perm: Perm State National Research University. 5—64. ISBN 978-5-904417-98-7. (In Russ.).
89. Solovyova, I. V. (2000). Representation of the category of politeness in the modern German language. PhD Diss. Moscow. 197 p. (In Russ.).
90. Sorokin, Yu. A. (2009). Linguocultural environment: contacts and conflicts. Tver: Agrosphere. 115 p. (In Russ.).
91. Sumina, E. S. (2007). Tolerance: from a phenomenon to a linguocultural concept. PhD Diss. Yekaterinburg. 277 p. (In Russ.).
92. Tamrazova, I. G. (2021). Eristics as a cognitive-semiotic model of deviant discursive rhetoric. Doct. Diss. Maykop. 466 p. (In Russ.).
93. Tangir, K. M. (2007a). Russian antinomic aphorisms: speech-language aspects of conflict and paradoxicity. Krasnodar: Krasnodar State University. 454 p. (In Russ.).
94. Tangir, K. M. (2007). Russian antinomic aphorisms: speech-language aspects of conflict and paradoxicity. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Krasnodar. 56 p. (In Russ.).
95. Tikhonova, V. Ya. (2005). The concept of “struggle” in the Russian language picture of the world. PhD Diss. Novosibirsk. 238 p. (In Russ.).
96. Tretyakova, V. S. (2010). Conflict in linguistic theories. Jurislinguistics, 10 (10): 141—149. (In Russ.).
97. Tretyakova, V. S. (2000). Conflict through the eyes of a linguist. Jurislinguistics, 2: 127—140. (In Russ.).
98. Tretyakova, V. S. (2009). Speech communication: harmony and conflict. Yekaterinburg: Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University. 230 p. (In Russ.).
99. Tretyakova, V. S. (2003). Speech conflict and harmonization of communication. Doct. Diss. Yekaterinburg. 301 p. (In Russ.).
100. Tsitsarkina, N. N. (2012). Objectification of the conceptosphere of social relations in modern English. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. St. Petersburg. 42 p. (In Russ.).
101. Ulyanova, N. N. (2015). Information wars in print media on the example of the Kosovo ethnic conflict (comparative analysis of publications of “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” and “The Washington Post” 2008—2013). PhD Diss. Moscow. 168 p. (In Russ.).
102. Umanets, L. V. (2004). Verbal representation of politeness in the sphere of business communication (based on the material of the modern German language). PhD Diss. Irkutsk. 128 p. (In Russ.).
103. Vasilenko, E. N. (2022). Conflict of values in Internet communication: cognitive and pragmalinguistic aspects: monograph. Mogilev: Mogilev State University named after A. A. Kuleshov. 236 p. ISBN 978-985-568-911-0. (In Russ.).
104. Verbal communication: contacts and conflicts. (2018). Ufa: Bashkir State Uni-versity. 212 p. ISBN 978-5-7477-4789-0. (In Russ.).
105. Volkova, O. S. (2009). Pragmalinguistic features of interpersonal communication in a communicative situation “domestic conflict” (based on the material of the English language). PhD Diss. Volgograd. 188 p. (In Russ.).
106. Voznesenskaya, Yu. V. (2010). Speech strategies of conflict in German political communication: based on the parliamentary debates in the Bundestag. PhD Diss. St. Petersburg. 186 p. (In Russ.).
107. Yusupova, S. M. (2018). The concept of “conflict” in the corpus dimension of idioms. Modern studies of social problems, 10 (4): 280—292. DOI: 10.12731/2077-1770-2018-4-280-292. (In Russ.).
108. Zatsepina, E. A. (2007). Lexical and phraseological objectification of the concept of “politeness” in the Russian language. PhD Diss. Voronezh. 189 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kinderknekht A.S. Conflict in Linguistic Researches. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(1):45-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-1-45-68
Views:
690
Email this article 