Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Concept of “Quixoticism” in Work of Miguel de Unamuno

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-1-282-295

Abstract

The article is devoted to the concept of “quixoticism” by M. de Unamuno. It is determined that Unamuno’s Quixoteism was formed on the basis of the philosophy of F. M. Dostoevsky, with which M. de Unamuno has much in common: the perception of the image of Don Quixote as a reflection of the national character. It is emphasized that the basic difference between these philosophies is the realism of the “Christ-like” image in F. M. Dostoevsky and the reality of the “quixotic” image, which goes beyond the artistic world in M. de Unamuno. It has been proven that Unamuno’s Quixoticism is essentially a religion that includes the main religious components, but Don Quixote lives on earth, while, unlike Christ, he is a man, a man with a divine beginning, a man who imitates God. The authors note that, despite the difference in approaches, both F. M. Dostoevsky and M. de Unamuno bow before the image of Don Quixote. Each of them sees in it a reflection of the national characteristics of the peoples to which the authors identify themselves (Russian and Spanish), as well as a biblical reference to Jesus Christ. It is determined that the distinguishing features of perception is the fact that the characters of F. M. Dostoevsky are striving for greater realism, while the characters of Unamuno are more real in their own way, even relative to its creator, and have a greater impact on the existence and spiritual development of “real” people than other “real” people. 

About the Authors

O. B. Elkan
Saint Petersburg Stieglitz State Academy of Art and Design named after A. L. Stieglitz
Russian Federation

Olga B. Elkan, Doctor of Arts, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Social Disciplines and Art History

St. Petersburg



M. V. Norets
V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Maxim V. Norets, Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and Practice of Translation

Simferopol



V. A. Putra
Crimean University of Culture, Arts and Tourism
Russian Federation

Violetta A. Putra, PhD in Cultural Studies, Associate Professor, Department of Choreography

Simferopol



References

1. A Companion to Miguel de Unamuno. (2016). Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer. 243 p.

2. Alessandri, М. А. (2012). Flesh and bone: Unamuno’s “quixotism” as an incarnation of kierkegaard’s “religiousness a”. The Pennsylvania State University, 56 (4): 434—448.

3. Basdekis, D. (1974). Unamuno and the Novel. Estudios de Hispanófila, 31.

4. Britt-Arredondo, C. (2015). Quixotism: the imaginative denial of Spain’s loss of empire. Albany: State University of New York Press. 266 p.

5. Camus, A. (1990). The Myth of Sisyphus: An Essay on the absurd. In: The Rebellious Man. Philosophy. Politics. Art. Moscow: Politizdat. 415 p. ISBN 5-250-01279-5. (In Russ.).

6. Cohen, А. А. (1973). Our Lord Don Quixote. The New York Timrs. Dec. 16. P. 397.

7. D’hondt, R., D’haen, Т. (2009). International Don Quixote. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi. 280 p. ISBN 9042025832.

8. Garadja, E. V. (1997). The Gospel of Don Quixote. In: Unamuno M. de. About the tragic feeling of life among people and nations. Kiev: Symbol. 414 p. ISBN 5-7248-0043-8. (In Russ.).

9. Izotova, I. S. (2011). Man, God and religion in the philosophical thanatology of Miguel de Unamuno. Questions of philosophy, 1: 56—69. (In Russ.).

10. Korkonosenko, K. S. (2002). Quixotism — the individual religion of Miguel de Unamuno. In: Unamuno M. de. The Life of Don Quixote and Sancho by Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningrad Branch. 394 p. ISBN 5-02-028458-0. (In Russ.).

11. Kostyukovich, E. A., Terteryan, I. A. (1983—1994). Spanish literature. In: History of World literature: In 8 volumes, 8. Moscow: Nauka. 56—69. (In Russ.).

12. Mancing, Н. (2004). The Cervantes Encyclopedia, 2: L-Z. Westport (Conn.); London: Greenwood Press. 417—863. ISBN 0-313-32891-9.

13. Mora, J. F., Silver, P. (1962). Unamuno: A Philosophy of Tragedy. Berkeley, CA: Uni-versity of California Press. 136 p.

14. Norets, M. V. (2021). The motive of repentance in the novel prose of F. M. Dostoevsky: monography. Simferopol: IT “ARIAL”. 232 p. ISBN 978-5-907438-10-1. (In Russ.).

15. Shaitanov, I. O. (2014). History of foreign literature of the Renaissance: textbook and workshop. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House. 385—412. ISBN 978-5-9916-3764-0. (In Russ.).

16. Stepanyan, K. A. (2013). Dostoevsky and Cervantes: Dialogue in a Big Time. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Writing. 363 p. ISBN 978-5-9551-0537-6. (In Russ.).

17. Unamuno, M. de. (1997). About the tragic sense of life in people and people. Kiev: Symbol. 414 p. ISBN 5-7248-0043-8. (In Russ.).

18. Unamuno, M. de. (2002). The Life of Don Quixote and Sancho by Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningrad Branch. 394 p. ISBN 5-02-028458-0. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Elkan O.B., Norets M.V., Putra V.A. Concept of “Quixoticism” in Work of Miguel de Unamuno. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(1):282-295. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-1-282-295

Views: 370


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)