Specificity of Comedy in Contemporary Kazakh Prose (E. Tursunov’s Short Story Cycle)
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-5-250-268
Abstract
The relevance of this article lies in the need to construct a comprehensive history of the development of comedy in contemporary Kazakhstani literature, of which the works of Ermek Tursunov are an integral part. The author explores various approaches to the study of irony, satire, and humor, including philosophical (G. Hegel, F. Schlegel), cultural (A. Bergson, B. Dzemidok, M. M. Bakhtin, D. S. Likhachev, Y. Borev, A. M. Panchenko, N. V. Ponyrko, V. Ya. Karasev), and philological (V. Tyupa, V. Propp, M. Yu. Asanina, I. A. Obukhova, S. A. Dubrovskaya). The scientific novelty lies in the fact that Tursunov’s stories are analyzed for the first time in the declared aspect. The research has established that, firstly, irony becomes an important means of comedy in Tursunov’s collection of stories “Karashanyrak”. Secondly, non-direct speech ironically exposes the hero’s surrounding world (“How Kazakhs believed in omens”). Thirdly, there is an orientation towards Chekhov’s humorous tradition (“How Kazakhs received guests”, “How brides became wives”). Fourthly, the writer’s humor relies on national Kazakhstani traditions of comedy embodied in folklore (“How Kazakhs organized noisy performances”). Finally, one of the ways of constructing a comedic plot in Tursunov’s stories is through the synthesis of an anecdote with elements of satire. This study offers new insights into the role of comedy in contemporary Kazakhstani literature and contributes to the broader understanding of humor as a literary device.
About the Authors
A. T. BaktybayevaRussian Federation
Annel T. Baktybayeva - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Doctoral degree seeker National Research Ogarev MSU; Head of the Department of Language Disciplines Asfendiyarov Kazakh NMU.
Saransk, Almaty
A. A. Bizhanova
Russian Federation
Ainur A. Bizhanova - Doctoral degree seeker.
Almaty, Kazakhstan
References
1. Asanina, M. Yu. (2004). “The laughing word” in the fiction of W. Faulkner in the second half of the 1920s — early 1930s: Based on the works of the “Joknapatofsky cycle”. PhD Diss. Saransk. 189 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (2012). Collected works. The Theory of the novel (1930—1960), 3. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures. 880 p. ISBN 5-89216-010-6. (In Russ.).
3. Bergson, A. (1992). Laughter. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 127 p. ISBN 5-85220-242-8. (In Russ.).
4. Bertels, E. E. (1960). History of Persiantajik literature. Moscow: Nauka. 524 p. (In Russ.).
5. Borev, Yu. B. (1970). Comic, or how laughter punishes the imperfection of the world, cleanses and renews a person and asserts the joy of being. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 272 p. (In Russ.).
6. Borev, Yu. B. (1997). Aesthetics: in 2 volumes, 1. Smolensk: Rusich. 496 p. (In Russ.).
7. Braginsky, V. I. (1983). History of Malay literature of the VII—XIX centuries. Moscow: Nauka. 495 p. (In Russ.).
8. Chavchanidze, D. L. (2001). Irony. In: Literary Encyclopedia of terms and concepts. Moscow: NPK “Intelvak”. 315—317. ISBN 5-93264-026-X. (In Russ.).
9. Chekhov, A. P. (1974). The complete works in 30 volumes, 1. Moscow: Nauka. 588 p. (In Russ.).
10. Chekhov, A. P. (1975). The complete works in 30 volumes, 3. Moscow: Nauka. 627 p. (In Russ.).
11. Chekhov, A. P. (1977). Complete works in 30 volumes, 10. Moscow: Nauka. 528 p. (In Russ.).
12. Demin, V. I. (2015). Laughter of my people. Comic in the oral and poetic creativity of Mordvins. Finno-Ugric world. Philological sciences, 4: 6—11. (In Russ.).
13. Dubrovskaya, S. A. (2014). “Gogol and Rabelais” as a plot of Russian literary criticism of the 1940s—1980s. Izvestiya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. A series of literature and language, 73 (6): 62—71. (In Russ.).
14. Dzemidok, B. (1974). About the comic. Moscow: Progress. 223 p. (In Russ.).
15. Filshtinsky, I. M. (2010). History of Arabic literature. V — the beginning of the X century. Moscow: URSS. 528 p. ISBN 978-5-397-00948-5. (In Russ.).
16. Hegel, F. (1929—1959). Collected works: in 14 vols., 12. Moscow: Publishing House of Socio-economic literature (Sotsekgiz). 532 p. (In Russ.).
17. Kamenskaya, Yu. V. (2001). Irony as a component of idiostyle A. P. Chekhov. PhD Diss. Sa-ratov. 173 p. (In Russ.).
18. Karasev, L. V. (1996). Philosophy of laughter. Moscow: RSUH. 224 p. ISBN 5-7281-0036-8. (In Russ.).
19. Khanzafarov, N. G. (1996). Tatar comedy (origins and development). Kazan: Fan. 266 p. (In Russ.).
20. Kuznetsova, T. L. (1994). Comic in Komi literature. Syktyvkar: KRIPPKRNO. 72 p. ISBN 5-7009-0017-3. (In Russ.).
21. Likhachev, D. S., Panchenko, A. M., Ponyrko, N. V. (1984). Laughter in Ancient Russia. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningrad Branch. 295 p. (In Russ.).
22. Obukhova, I. A. (2012). The laughing word in the domestic “small prose” of the 20s of the XX century: I. E. Babel, M. M. Zoshchenko, M. A. Bulgakov, P. S. Romanov. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Ulyanovsk. 13 p. (In Russ.).
23. Osmukhina, O. Y. (2015). The author’s mask of the grandfather of the Anthropologist in the novelistics of M. Volkov. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, 4: 243—247. (In Russ.).
24. Polukhin, O. V. (1996). American intellectual and satirical novel of the 70—80s of the twentieth century (K. Vonnegut, J. Heller). PhD Diss. Moscow. 198 p. (In Russ.).
25. Pospelov, G. N. (1983). Holistically-systemic understanding of literary works. In: Questions of methodology and poetics: collection of articles. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University. 138—172. (In Russ.).
26. Propp, V. Ya. (1999). Problems of comedy and laughter. Ritual laughter in folklore. Moscow: Labyrinth. 288 p. ISBN 5-87604-065-7. (In Russ.).
27. Shidfar, B. Ya. (1974). The figurative system of Arabic classical literature (VI—XII centuries). Moscow: Nauka. Gl. ed. east. lit-ry. 320 p. (In Russ.).
28. Surkov, A. A. (ed.). (1962—1978). Brief literary Encyclopedia, 3. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia. 1088 stb. (In Russ.).
29. Tursunov, E. (2020). Karashanyrak. Almaty: Soz. 341 p. (In Russ.).
30. Tyupa, V. (2001). Analytics of artistry. Introduction to literary analysis. Moscow: Labyrinth, RSUH. 192 p. ISBN 5-87604-116. (In Russ.).
31. Tyurin, Yu. P. (2004). Perspective of memory: cinema, history, literature. Moscow: Main-land. 149 p. ISBN 5-85646-122-3. (In Russ.).
32. Uvarov, A. N. (1979). Artistic originality of Udmurt satire. Izhevsk: Udmurtia. 130 p. (In Russ.).
33. Yesin, A. B. (2007). Principles and techniques of literary work analysis: textbook. 8th ed. Moscow: Nauka. 248 p. ISBN 5-89349-049-5. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Baktybayeva A.T., Bizhanova A.A. Specificity of Comedy in Contemporary Kazakh Prose (E. Tursunov’s Short Story Cycle). Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(5):250-268. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-5-250-268