Planned Innovations: Proposals for Enhancing Inventiveness Efficiency in USSR in Mid-1950s to Late 1960s

The article analyzes proposals for the activation of inventive and rationalizing activities in the mid-1950s to the 1960s, as well as measures to stimulate the implementation of inventions in production. The study examines archival documents of the Committee for Inventions and Discoveries of the All-Union Society of Inventors and Rationalizers. The main problems of mass inventiveness and rationalization development, as well as the characteristic features of the system of scientific and technical progress management in the USSR, are identified. The key role of the state in supporting various forms of inventive activity is emphasized. It is established that the centralized system of invention management corresponded to the idea of the need for a comprehensive approach to managing scientific and technical progress. However, it is noted that numerous restructuring of the state management system during the studied period, departmentalization, and the lack of a unified state scientific and technical policy reduced the effectiveness of the measures taken. The complex tasks aimed at increasing the efficiency of inventiveness and rationalization are described. The conclusion is drawn about the understanding by the officials of the leading bodies of the problems of innovative development in the USSR. This is confirmed by attempts to develop a comprehensive program to stimulate inventive activity and expedite the implementation of inventions in production. 

1. Artemov,E.T. (2019). Mobilization and competition in the Soviet atomic project. ECO, 7 (541): 156—172. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2019-7-156-172. (In Russ.).

2. Bailes, K. (1978). Technology and Society under Lenin and Stalin: Origins of the Soviet Technical Intelligentsia, 1917—1941. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 488 p. ISBN 978-0-69163-468-5.

3. Bogolyubov, E. A. (2023). Establishment of state control over public organizations in Soviet Russia. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. History, 81: 5—11. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/81/1. (In Russ.).

4. Dasgupta, P., David, P. A. (1994). Toward a New Economics of Science. Research Policy, 23: 487—521. DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1.

5. Denisov, Yu. D. (2017). The Japanese way of scientific and technical development. Yearbook Japan, 46: 117—132. (In Russ.).

6. Gordeeva, N. A. (1985). Interrelations of academic science and production (organizational and legal aspect). Moscow: Nauka. 189 p. ISBN 5-1584899-A. (In Russ.).

7. Graham, L. (2014). Will Russia be able to compete? The History of innovation in Tsarist, Soviet and Modern Russia. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber. 272 p. ISBN 978-5- 91657-903-1. (In Russ.).

8. Grishkov, V. F., Plotnikov, V. A., Frolov, A. O. (2022). Mobilization economy in modern Russia: Theoretical aspects. Izvestiya of St. Petersburg State University of Economics, 3 (135): 7—13. (In Russ.).

9. Inglehart, R., Welzel, K. (2011). Modernization, cultural changes and democracy: The sequence of human development. Moscow: New Publishing House. 464 p. ISBN 978- 5-98379-144-2. (In Russ.).

10. Kapinzaiki Ottonikar, S. L., Arraisa, P. M., Armellini, F. (2020). Open Science and open innovations: new opportunities for countries with economies in transition. Foresight, 14 (4): 95—111. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2020.4.95.111. (In Russ.).

11. Kortunov, S. V. (2009). National identity. Comprehension of meaning. Moscow: Aspect Press. 591 p. ISBN 978-5-7567-0551-5. (In Russ.).

12. Kudrov, V. M. (2007). Russian economy in a global context. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya. 736 p. ISBN 978-5-903354-38-2. (In Russ.).

13. Lakhtin, G. A. (1990). Organization of Soviet science: history and modernity. Moscow: Nauka. 217 p. ISBN 5-02-011997-0. (In Russ.).

14. Lyutyy, A. P. (2016). Coordination activity of the Institute of Electric Welding named after E. O. Paton. Knowledge, 4—4 (33): 19—24. (In Russ.).

15. Mityakov, S. N. (2022). Model of mobilization economy. Development and security, 1 (13): 16—33. DOI: 10.46960/2713-2633_2022_1_16. (In Russ.).

16. Pinayeva, D. A. (2018). Scientific and Technical Societies as Form of Mobilization of Engineering and Technical Workers and Innovators of Production in Tatar ASSR in Second Half of the 1950s — Early 1960s. Nauchnyi dialog, 10: 284—299. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2018-10-284-299 (In Russ.).

17. Pinaeva, D. A. (2020). On the development of social forms of cooperation of engineering and technical workers and innovators of production in the USSR in the 1950s and 1960s. (based on the materials of the Tatar ASSR). Bulletin of Tomsk State University. History, 63: 65—71. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/63/9. (In Russ.).

18. Pleschenko, V. I. (2018). Open innovations in Russia: prototypes and modernity. Intellectual Property Exchange, 17 (2): 8—15. (In Russ.).

19. Round table “Mobilization economy”: the concept, its boundaries and content. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 15 (196): 142—147. (In Russ.).

20. Soldatova, O. N. (2013). Inventors and inventive activity in the development of scientific and technological progress of the industry of the Soviet state (1917—1956). Samara: LLC “Publishing House As Gard”. 569 p. ISBN 978-5-4259-0273-3. (In Russ.).

21. Ubushiev, E. V. (2018). Economic security in various technological structures. Theoretical and applied economics, 3: 1—21. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8647.2018.3.27119. (In Russ.).

22. Yurchak, A. (2016). It was forever until it was over. The last Soviet generation. Moscow: New Literary Review. 664 p. ISBN 978-5-4448-0190-1. (In Russ.).