Uselessness as Main Utilitarian Antivalue of Contemporary Comedic Discourse in English Linguistic Culture
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-8-245-261
Abstract
The present study examines the features of the comedic objectification of the concept of USELESSNESS in contemporary English-language comedic discourse. This concept is considered for the first time as the main utilitarian antivalue in comedic discourse, using an axiological approach. The analysis includes recordings and scripts of over 70 stand-up comedy performances, more than 500 episodes of various sitcoms, and 60 episodes of different humorous shows. It is determined that within comedic discourse, the concept of USELESSNESS is a socially-oriented antivalue concept. It is noted that the main satirized socio-cultural characteristics are professional traits. It is established that the manifestation of uselessness in English-language comedic discourse is evaluated negatively either by the author of the work or by its positive characters. The main ridiculed characteristics of the antivalue concept of USELESSNESS include failure to perform necessary actions (inability to perform simple / basic actions and low quality of performed actions) and performance of unnecessary actions (actions that bring no benefit; accompanying actions that cause harm). It is determined that police officers, politicians, doctors, military personnel, lawyers, and teachers are most frequently ridiculed. The main linguistic means for expressing the concept of USELESSNESS include hyperbole, paradox, and antithesis.
About the Author
A. I. Bochkarev
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Arsentiy I. Bochkarev - PhD in Philology, Head of the Department of Foreign Languages of Technical Faculties.
Novosibirsk
Scopus AuthorID: 57205475245
References
1. Burr, B. You People Are All the Same. Available at: https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/2017/05/24/bill-burr-people-2012-full-transcript/ (accessed 13.09.2023).
2. Chappelle, D. The Closer. Available at: https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/comedy/dave-chappelle-the-closer-transcript/ (accessed 13.09.2023).
3. Gadsby, H. Nanette. Available at: https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/comedy/hannah-gadsby-nanette-transcript/ (accessed 13.09.2023).
4. How, I Met Your Mother. Canning Randy. Available at: https://subslikescript.com/series/How_I_Met_Your_Mother-460649/season-6/episode-7-Canning_Randy (accessed 13.09.2023).
5. How, I Met Your Mother. Garbage Island. Available at: https://subslikescript.com/series/How_I_Met_Your_Mother-460649/season-6/episode-17-Garbage_Island (accessed 13.09.2023).
6. MD — Macmillan Dictionary. Available at: https://www.macmillandictionary.com (accessed 13.09.2023).
7. OALD — Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Available at: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com (accessed 13.09.2023).
8. Roast of Charlie Sheen. Available at: https://subslikescript.com/movie/Comedy_Central_Roast_of_Charlie_Sheen-1985970 (accessed 13.09.2023).
9. Rock, Ch. Never Scared. Available at: https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/2018/01/19/chris-rock-never-scared-2004-full-transcript/ (accessed 13.09.2023).
10. Seinfeld, J. 23 Hours to Kill. Available at: https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/comedy/jerry-seinfeld-23-hours-to-kill-transcript/ (accessed 13.09.2023).
11. Two and a Half Men. Pie Hole, Herb. Available at: https://subslikescript.com/series/Two_and_a_Half_Men-369179/season-6/episode-2-Pie_Hole_Herb (accessed 13.09.2023).
12. Williams, R. Weapons of Self Destruction. Available at: https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/2019/04/30/robin-williams-weapons-of-self-destruction-transcript/ (accessed 13.09.2023).
13. Arskaya, M. A. (2001). Semantic category of aesthetic evaluation (beautiful / ugly) and its ontology in modern German. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Irkutsk. 24 p. (In Russ.).
14. Arutyunova, N. D. (1988). Types of linguistic meanings: Assessment. Event. Fact. Moscow: Nauka. 341 p. (In Russ.).
15. Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theories of Humor. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 426 p.
16. Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Creativity of Francois Rabelais and folk culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Moscow: Fiction. 543 p. ISBN 5-280-00710-2. (In Russ.).
17. Bentham, I. (1998). Introduction to the Foundation of morality and legislation. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 415 p. ISBN 5-86004-166-7. (In Russ.).
18. Bochkarev, A. I. (2022). Comic characteristics of the value concept “stupidity” in Anglo-Saxon linguoculture on the material of stand-up comedies. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, 80: 30—44. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/80/2. (In Russ.).
19. Bochkarev, A. I. (2023). Emotional reaction of the audience as a way of assessing the comic and value statuses of various phenomena. Questions of psycholinguistics, 1 (55): 24—35. DOI: 10.30982/2077-5911-2023-55-1-24-35. (In Russ.).
20. Brandt, R. B. (1992). Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press. 393 p.
21. Davis, D. (2008). Communication and humor. In: The Primer of Humor Research. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 543—568. DOI: 10.1515/9783110198492.543.
22. Eco, U. (2007). On Ugliness. London: The Random House Group Limited. 455 p.
23. Gurevich, P. S. (2001). Philosophy of Man, 2. Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy. 209 p. (In Russ.).
24. Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Hegel’s Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, 1. New York: Oxford University Press. 611 p.
25. Karasik, V. I. (2019). Language spiral: values, signs, motives. Moscow: Gnosis. 424 p. ISBN 978-5-94244-062-6. (In Russ.).
26. Korolevskaya, E. M. (2012). Phraseological representation of predicate characteristics of a common subject in Russian, Czech and English. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Volgograd. 22 p. (In Russ.).
27. Kudryashova, O. M. (2007). Artistic embodiment of the concept of “pride” in the novels of Jane Austen. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Nizhny Novgorod. 20 p. (In Russ.).
28. Kulinich, M. A. (2004). Linguoculturology of humor (based on the material of the English language). Samara: Publishing House of the SSPU. 263 p. ISBN 5-8428-0451-4. (In Russ.).
29. Lloyd, M. (2011). Miss Grimshaw and the White Elephant: Categorism in a risque humor competition. Humor, 24 (1): 63—86. DOI: 10.1515/humr.2011.004.
30. Maryanchik, V. A. (2013). Axiological and evaluative nature of the media-political text. Moscow: URSS. 272 p. ISBN 978-5-397-03976-5. (In Russ.).
31. Mill, J. S. (2013). Utilitarianism. Rostov-on-Don: Don Publishing House. 240 p. (In Russ.).
32. Osipova, Yu. V. (2011). Utilitarian values in the context of modern culture. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Rostov-on-Don. 38 p. (In Russ.).
33. Peterson, C., Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press. 800 p.
34. Prokofiev, A. (2019). Utilitarianism. Philosophical Anthropology, 5 (2): 192—215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2019-5-2-192-215. (In Russ.).
35. Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company. 284 p.
36. Serebrennikova, E. F. (2011). Key concepts of axiological analysis. In: Linguistics and axiology: ethnosemiometry of value meanings. Moscow: THESAURUS. 27—40. ISBN 978-5-98421-117-8. (In Russ.).
37. Shabunina, E. V. (2016). The Nature of the comic in P. G. Wodehouse’s novels about Jeeves and Wooster. PhD Diss. St. Petersburg. 316 p. (In Russ.).
38. Sychev, A. A. (2003). The nature of laughter or the Philosophy of the comic. Saransk: Mordovian University Press. 176 p. ISBN 5-7103-0910-9. (In Russ.).
39. Tannsjo, T. (1998). Hedonistic Utilitarianism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 185 p.
Review
For citations:
Bochkarev A.I. Uselessness as Main Utilitarian Antivalue of Contemporary Comedic Discourse in English Linguistic Culture. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(8):245-261. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-8-245-261
Views:
245
Email this article 