Mozart by A. S. Pushkin and Prince Myshkin by F. M. Dostoevsky: Problem of Double Encoding

The problem of double encoding of the characters’ images is considered: Mozart (“Mozart and Salieri” by A. S. Pushkin) and Prince Myshkin (“The Idiot” by F. M. Dostoevsky). The novelty of the research lies in the authors’ attempt to move from an empirical level of understanding the problem to a theoretical one. The methodological basis of the study becomes a semiotic approach to the analysis of literary texts. It is noted that it is the principles of semiotics that make it possible to put the accumulated baggage of empirical knowledge at the basis of a concept that points to the reasons for the double encoding of the characters’ images. The purpose of the article is to explain why Mozart and Prince Myshkin realize the image of the ideal person not in the sphere of functioning of the sacred code of culture, but in the sphere of profane culture, where each sacred image corresponds to a symbol related to sacred reality and transforming it. The comparison of the characters of Mozart and Prince Myshkin is based on the commonality of sacred motifs, supplemented by autobiographical, literary, and mythopoetic material. It is argued that these additions indicate the interaction in the consciousness of the writers in creating these images of the sacred, or biblical, code of culture with the profane. It is concluded that Mozart and Prince Myshkin are images created on the basis of double encoding and implying double interpretation.

1. Dostoevsky, F. M. (1989). Idiot. In: Collected works in 15 volumes, 6. Leningrad: Nauka. 671 p. (In Russ.).

2. Dostoevsky, F. M. (1996). Letters 1934—1981. In: Collected works in 15 volumes, 15. St. Petersburg: Nauka. 856 p. (In Russ.).

3. Pushkin, A. S. (1957). Mozart and Salieri. In: Complete collection of Op. in 10 tt., 5. Moscow: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 357—368. (In Russ.).

4. Alekseev, M. P. (1935). “Mozart and Salieri”. In: A. S. Pushkin Complete collection of works, 7: Dramatic works. Moscow; Leningrad. 524—547. (In Russ.).

5. Bagno, V. E. (2009). “Mozart and Salieri”. In: Complete works in 20 tt., 7. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. 777—813. ISBN 5-02-028342-8. (In Russ.).

6. Bakhtin, M. M. (1994). Problems of creativity / poetics of Dostoevsky. Kiev: NEXT. 508 p. (In Russ.). Belyakova, E. N. (2015).

7. Prince Myshkin as a new type of tragic hero in the philosophical concept of D. S. Merezhkovsky (on the question of the reception of F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel “The Idiot” in the criticism of the Silver Age). Bulletin of the N. A. Nekrasov KSU, 1: 104—108. (In Russ.).

8. Berdyaev, N. (1994). Dostoevsky’s worldview. In: Philosophy of Creativity, Culture and Art: in 2 vols., 2. Moscow: Iskusstvo, LIGA. 509 p. ISBN 5-210-02321-4. (In Russ.).

9. Bocharov, S. G. (1985). About artistic worlds. Moscow: Soviet Russia. 296 p. (In Russ.). Brion, M. (2007). Mozart. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. 338 p. ISBN 978-5-235-03052-7. (In Russ.).

10. Curtius, E. (2002). The History of Ancient Greece in 5 volumes, 4. Minsk: Harvest. 398 p. (In Russ.).

11. Dolinin, A. A. (2006—2022). From the new commentary to “Mozart and Salieri”. RAS. Available at: http://lib.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default.aspx?tabid=10150 (accessed 27.10.2023). (In Russ.).

12. Dudareva, M. A. (2021). Apophatics of culture in the poem by N. A. Nekrasov “Who lives well in Russia: national being and otherness”. Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, humanitarian, medical and biological sciences, 23 (80): 68—74. (In Russ.).

13. Dunaev, M. M. (1997). Chapter 10. Dostoevsky. In: Orthodoxy and Russian literature: in 7 vols., 3. Moscow: Christian Literature. 284—560. (In Russ.).

14. Ermakov, I. D. (1923). Etudes on the psychology of creativity of A. S. Pushkin (The experience of organic understanding of the “House in Kolomna”, “The Prophet” and small tragedies). Moscow; Petrograd: State Publishing House. 192 p. (In Russ.).

15. Friedlander, G. M. (1985). Dostoevsky and world literature. Leningrad: Sov. Writer: Leningr. publishing house. 456 p. (In Russ.).

16. Gavrilov, I. B. (2016). Stepan Petrovich Shevyrev on the “Russian view”. Christian reading, 1: 229—289. (In Russ.).

17. Gershenzon, M. (1919). Wisdom of Pushkin. Moscow: Publishing House of Writers in Moscow. 229 p. (In Russ.).

18. Golosovker, Ya. E. (1963). Dostoevsky and Kant. Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences. 101 p. (In Russ.).

19. Gorbunov, A. N. (2014). From the creation of the world to its end (mysteries of the York cycle). In: Mysteries of the York cycle. Moscow: Ladomir. Nauka. 767—829. ISBN 978-5-86218-516-4. (In Russ.).

20. Grossman, L. (1924). Dostoevsky’s Way. Leningrad: Brockhaus-Efron. 236 p. (In Russ.).

21. Gudkova, S. P., Dubrovskaya, S. A., Sharonova, E. A. (2013). The originality of the artistic space of A. S. Pushkin’s dramaturgy: a laughing discourse. Humanities and Education, 4 (16): 123—127. (In Russ.).

22. Gukovsky, G. A. (1957). Pushkin and the problems of realistic style. Moscow: State Publishing House of Fiction. 416 p. (In Russ.).

23. Kalashnikov, S. B. (2005). The cherished gift of love or the poison of Izora? (About the autobiographical aspect of Pushkin’s “Mozart and Salieri”). Bulletin of the Volga. Series 8, 4: 6—13. (In Russ.).

24. Kalinnikov, L. A. (2001). Theory of genius in the aesthetics of Kant and “Mozart and Salieri” by Pushkin. Kant collection: Interuniversity thematic collection of scientific papers, 1 (22): 138—171. (In Russ.).

25. Kasatkina, T. (2004). On the creative nature of the word. Ontology of the word in the works of F. M. Dostoevsky as the basis of “realism in the highest sense”. Moscow: IMLI RAS. 480 p. ISBN 5-9208-0173-5. (In Russ.).

26. Krinitsyn, A. B. (2016). “Mozart and Salieri” by A. S. Pushkin as a source of the poem about the Grand Inquisitor in the novel “The Brothers Karamazov” by F. M. Dostoevsky. Philological Sciences, 3: 43—47. (In Russ.).

27. Kuzicheva, M. (2014). Pushkin and Mozart: on the question of the relationship of poetics. Questions of literature. Available at: https://voplit.ru/2022/07/31/pushkin-i-motsartk-voprosu-o-rodstve-poetik / (accessed 28.10.2022). (In Russ.).

28. Levi-Strauss, K. (2006). Mythologiki: Raw and cooked. Moscow: FreeFly. 399 p. ISBN 5-98358-111-2. (In Russ.).

29. Levi-Strauss, K. (2011). Structural anthropology. Moscow: AST, Astrel. 541 p. ISBN 978-5- 17-066744-4. (In Russ.).

30. Losev,A. F. (2006). Homer. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. 400 p. ISBN 5-235-02267-X. (In Russ.).

31. Lossky, N. O. (1953). Dostoevsky and his Christian worldview. New York: Publishing House. Chekhov. 406 p. (In Russ.).

32. Lotman, Yu. M. (2002). Articles on the semiotics of culture and art. St. Petersburg: Akad. Project. 542 p. ISBN 5-7331-0184-9. (In Russ.).

33. Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Selected articles: in 3 volumes. In: Articles on semiotics and topology of culture, 1. Tallinn: Alexandra. 247 p. (In Russ.).

34. Lukian, S. (2004). Ignoramus, who bought a lot of books per. N. P. Baranov. In: Antiquity. Literature and art. Moscow: Direct Media Publishing. 346—356. (In Russ.).

35. Merezhkovsky, D. S. (1995). L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Eternal companions. Moscow: Republic. 624 p. ISBN 5-250-02540-4. (In Russ.).

36. Merezhkovsky, D. S. (1994). On the new meaning of ancient tragedy. In: Aesthetics and Criticism: in 2 volumes, 1. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 547—554. ISBN 5-210-01299-9. (In Russ.).

37. Meyendorf And (Archpriest). (2001). Byzantine theology. Historical trends and doctrinal themes. Minsk: Rays of Sofia. 336 p. ISBN 5-93348-022-3. (In Russ.).

38. Nazirov, R. G. (2020). Traditions of Gogol and Pushkin in Russian prose of the XIX century: a comparative history of fables. Nazirov Archive, 4 (30): 34—261. (In Russ.).

39. Ponomareva, G. B. (2001). Dostoevsky: I am engaged in this mystery. Moscow: Akademkniga. 304 p. ISBN 5-94628-004-X. (In Russ.).

40. Saraskina, L. (2006). Dostoevsky in consonances and attractions (from Pushkin to Solzhenitsyn). Moscow: Russian Way. 602 p. ISBN 5-85887-236-0. (In Russ.).

41. Stepanyan, K. A. (2006). “To know and say”: “realism in the highest sense” as a creative method of F. M. Dostoevsky. Moscow: Russian Way. 602 p. ISBN 5-85735-146-4. (In Russ.).

42. Stepanyan, K. A. (2010). Phenomenon and dialogue in the novels of F. M. Dostoevsky. Saint Petersburg: Kriga. 398 p. ISBN 978-5-901805-47-3. (In Russ.).

43. Toporov, V. N. (2003). The Petersburg text of Russian Literature: Selected Works. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB. 612 p. ISBN 5210015459. (In Russ.).

44. Uspensky, B. A. (1970). Poetics of composition: the structure of a literary text and the typology of a compositional form. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 223 p. (In Russ.).

45. Varsonofy of Optina, the Monk. Spiritual heritage. (2009). Moscow: Alta-Print. 704 p. (In Russ.).

46. Vatsuro, V. E. (2012). About “Mozart and Salieri” by Pushkin. 07.11. Available at: https://omiliya.org/article/o-motsarte-i-saleri-pushkina-ve-vatsuro.html (accessed 16.10.2023). (In Russ.).

47. Wackenroder, V. G. (1977). Fantasies about art. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 263 p. (In Russ.).

48. Weststeijn, W. G. Review Article: New Literary Russian History. University of Amsterdam. Available at: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/1-s2.0-S0304347923000595-main.pdf (accessed 27.10.2023).