Functional Potential of Multilingual Text in Urban Space: a Linguistic-Semiotic Perspective
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-142-165
Abstract
This article analyzes the functional potential of multilingual texts within urban spaces from a linguistic-semiotic perspective. The study uses a sample of 1590 multilingual texts, consisting of photographs of graffiti objects found in four cities in Southern Russia: Nalchik, the Novorossiysk agglomeration (Novorossiysk and Myskhako), Pyatigorsk, and Rostov-on-Don. The methods used include continuous sampling of multilingual texts, content analysis of their verbal elements, semiotic analysis of their graphic elements, comparative and contrastive methods, and quantitative data processing techniques. The phenomenon of graffiti is analyzed from linguistic and linguo-semiotic perspectives, with a distinction made between graffiti and street art. The authors describe the ontology of graffiti in the urban environment through a series of important dichotomies: visibility / invisibility, performance / risk / art, and sanction/unsanction. The functions of graffiti are also examined in detail, including their integrative-identifying function, self-presentation function, protest function, subversive function, and advertising / propaganda function. The study concludes that multilingual texts, represented in the form of graffiti within urban spaces, have significant functional potential.
About the Authors
O. A. AlimuradovRussian Federation
Oleg A. Alimuradov - Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Western European Languages and Cultures.
Pyatigorsk
M. A. Gorbunova
Russian Federation
Miroslava A. Gorbunova - PhD in Political Science, Department of English for Specific Purposes.
Pyatigorsk
References
1. Baudrillard, J. (2000). Symbolic exchange and death. Moscow: Dobrosvet. 389 p. ISBN 5-7913-0047-6. (In Russ.).
2. Ferrell, J. (2016). Graffiti, Street Art and the Politics of Complexity. In: Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art. New York: Routledge. XXX—XXXIX.
3. Kress, G., Van Leeuwen, Th. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold, member of the Hodder Headline Group. 142 p. ISBN 0340662921, 9780340662922.
4. Lachmann, R. (1988). Graffiti as Career and Ideology. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (2): 229—250.
5. Lotman, Yu. M. (1984). Symbolism of St. Petersburg and problems of semiotics of the city. In: Proceedings on sign systems, 18. Tartu: Tartu State University. 30—45. (In Russ.).
6. Lyng, S. (1990). Edgework. American Journal of Sociology, 95 (4): 851—886.
7. Penetova, E. V. (2016). Graffiti as a phenomenon of urban culture. Art or vandalism? Bulletin of the Prikamsky Social Institute, 2 (74): 89—92. (In Russ.).
8. Pyatigorsky, A. M. (1962). Materials on the history of Indian philosophy. Moscow: Publishing House of Oriental Literature. 255 p. (In Russ.).
9. Ross, J. I. (2016). Sorting It All Out. In: Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art. New York: Routledge. 1—10.
10. Schacter, R. (2016). Graffiti and Street Art as Ornament. In: Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art. New York: Routledge. 141—157.
11. Schacter, R. (2013). The World Atlas of Street Art and Graffiti. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing; University of New South Wales Press Ltd. 399 p. ISBN 1742246532, 9781742246536.
12. Toporov, V. N. (1984). Petersburg and the “Petersburg text of Russian literature”. In: Works on sign systems, 18. Tartu: Tartu State University. 4—29. (In Russ.).
13. Zaslavskaya, A. Yu., Serova, M. M. (2012). “Street art” or the art of street interventions. The messenger of the SSASU. Series: Urban Planning and Architecture, 1: 11—16. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Alimuradov O.A., Gorbunova M.A. Functional Potential of Multilingual Text in Urban Space: a Linguistic-Semiotic Perspective. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(10):142-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-142-165