Genre of Discours de réception: Marguerite Yourcenar’s Speech upon her Election to French Academy and Gender Turn
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-9-25
Abstract
This article analyzes the inaugural speech (discours de réception) delivered in 1981 by Marguerite Yourcenar, the first female writer elected as a member of the French Academy. Since the 17th century, such speeches have been mandatory for newly elected academicians, serving as a communicative product of academic speech practice. The study notes that commemorative speeches in honor of deceased members of the academy typically involve the use of praise as an evaluative strategy. Following the genre’s requirements, Marguerite Yourcenar addresses the conceptual space of “the value of literary heritage” of Roger Caillois, whose “academic chair” she was about to occupy as a new academician. In his work, she identifies authorial conceptual metaphors (such as “life is a game”: vie — jeu) that align with her own value system, confirming this alignment with examples from her own books or life experience. The article highlights authorial conceptual oppositions, including men — women (homes / femmes), friendship — hatred (amitié / haine), and life — death (vie / mort). As a newly elected academician, Marguerite Yourcenar perceives the French Academy as a scientific institution with both merits (Académie — science, littérature, connaissance) and shortcomings (Académie — préjugés, archaїsme), reflecting her personal position as well as her gender and social identity.
About the Authors
L. G. VikulovaRussian Federation
Larisa G. Vikulova - Doctor of Philology, Professor, Department of Romance Languages and Linguodidactics
Moscow
O. I. Korolenko
Russian Federation
Olga I. Korolenko - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Romance Languages and Linguodidactics
Moscow
Yu. G. Tkachenko
Russian Federation
Yulia G. Tkachenko - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Romance Languages and Linguodidactics
Moscow
References
1. Alikin, V. A. (2016). The game in the philosophy of Roger Kayua: between instincts and cul-ture. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Episode 7: Philosophy. Sociology and social technologies, 1 (31): 21—27. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu7.2016.1.3. (In Russ.).
2. Brémond, M. (2021). Marguerite Yourcenar, une femme à l’Académie. Malgré eux, malgré elle… Paris: Classiques Garnier. 180 p. ISBN 978-2-406-11161-0. (In Frenc.).
3. Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2011). Communication in science: normative and deviant. Linguistic and sociocultural analysis. Moscow: URSS. 240 p. ISBN 978-5-397-02035-0. (In Russ.).
4. Chupryna, O. G. (2020). Language. Culture. Text: textbook for graduate students studying in the field of Linguistics. Moscow: FLINT. 104 p. ISBN 978-5-9765-4368-3. (In Russ.).
5. Dementyev, V. V. (2000). Indirect communication and its genres. Saratov: Sarat Publishing House. Unita. 248 p. ISBN 5-292-02534-8. (In Russ.).
6. Dubrovskaya, O. G. (2014). Socio-cultural context of knowledge of the subject of discursive activity. Cognitive studies of language, 18: 68—71. (In Russ.).
7. Gerasimova, S. A. (2022). The formation of the scientific identity of J. L. D'Alembert and his contribution to the development of literary genres of the XVIII century. Philology: scientific research, 8: 19—32. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0749.2022.8.38171. (In Russ.).
8. Interaction of languages and cultures: from dialogue to polylogue. (2021). Moscow: VKN. 328 p. ISBN 978-5-907086-89-0. (In Russ.).
9. Karasik, V. I. (2016). Discursology as a direction of communicative linguistics. Actual prob-lems of philology and pedagogical linguistics, 1 (21): 17—34. (In Russ.).
10. Karasik, V. I. (2011). Gratitude: concept and genre. Genres of speech, 7: 235—253. (In Russ.).
11. Kayua, R. (2006). Into the depths of the fantastic. Reflected stones. St. Petersburg: Ivan Limbach Publishing House. 276, [3] p. (In Russ.).
12. Kulesza, M. (2019). Le discours de recéption à l’académie française: un lien entre le passé et le présent. Romanica Cracoviensia, 1 (19): 71—78. (In Frenc.).
13. Naudier, D. (2004). L'irrésistible élection de Marguerite Yourcenar à l'Académie française. Cahiers du Genre, 36 (1): 45—67. DOI: 10.3917/cdge.036.0045. (In Frenc.).
14. Prévot, A.-M. (2010). Réception stylistique de l’œuvre de Marguerite Yourcenar: une écriture en lignes de faille. In: La réception critique de l'œuvre de Marguerite Yourcenar. Clermont-Ferrand: SIEY. 437—453. (In Frenc.).
15. Shapovalova, T. A., Vityutneva, A. S. (2015). Manipulative potential of epideictic speech. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. History, 6 (38): 74—78. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/38/12. (In Russ.).
16. Sinelnikova, L. N. (2011). On the scientific legitimacy of the concept of "discursive personali-ty". Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky Tauride National University. Series: Philology. Social communication, 24 (63) / 2—1: 454—463. (In Russ.).
17. Stogova, A. V. (2008). Women and salons in the intellectual culture of France. In: Imagines Mundi: Almanac of studies of universal history of the XVI—XX centuries, 5 (3). Yekate-rinburg: Ural Publishing House. Unita. 335—345. (In Russ.).
18. The dialogue of cultures. the culture of dialogue: Man and new socio-humanitarian values: the collective. Monograph. (2017). Moscow: NEOLITHIC. 424 p. ISBN 978-5-9909479-7-9. (In Russ.).
19. Vikulova, L. G. Etiquette of dialogue in the communicative practice of the XVII century. Bul-letin of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Series: "Philology. Theory of language. Language education", 1 (41): 53—67. DOI: 10.256888/2076-913X.2021.41.1.06. (In Russ.).
20. Vikulova, L. G., Korolen, O. I. (2020). Memorable solemn speeches as a genre of academic discourse. In: Romance notebooks: a collection of articles in memory of Professor Alla Viktorovna Shchepilova. Moscow: Languages of the Peoples of the World. 73—81. ISBN 978-5-89191-085-0. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Vikulova L.G., Korolenko O.I., Tkachenko Yu.G. Genre of Discours de réception: Marguerite Yourcenar’s Speech upon her Election to French Academy and Gender Turn. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(1):9-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-9-25