Problems of Russian Theatrical Reception of Shakespeare in Criticism of Yuli Eichenwald

The problem of this study lies in evaluating the methodological approach of Yuli Eichenwald (1872—1928) as a theatrical critic and theorist, specifically his writings on Shakespearean productions both in Russia and abroad. Known primarily as a literary critic, Eichenwald also wrote about theater, but his works in this area have been largely unexplored. The aim of this study is to shed light on Eichenwald's principles of theatrical criticism. The material used consists of little-known articles by Eichenwald on theater theory and Shakespearean productions from 1903 to 1927. The research employs hermeneutic and comparative methods. The findings reveal that Eichenwald demonstrates a literature-centric position in his articles on theater, according to which theater is merely an illustration of literary works. He increasingly uses productions as a pretext to discuss Shakespeare, often without mentioning the actors or directors. Eichenwald’s perception of theater as a mediator, as an auxiliary device between the play and the reader, leads to his rejection of the concept of directorial theater and the denial of the director as the author of the production. The authors conclude that Eichenwald’s theatrical criticism is a logical outcome of literature-centric judgments about theater, from Aristotle to Hegel, where theater is considered as part of literature.

1. Alekseev, A. A. (2007). Rhythm as the basis of the suggestiveness of Yu. I. Aikhenvald’s style in an essay about Boris Zaitsev. Bulletin of the Kolomna State Pedagogical Insti-tute, 3 (4): 24—32. (In Russ.).

2. Alekseev, A. A. (2013a). Irrationalism as the basis of the method of literary criticism by Yu. I. Aikhenvald. Human capital, 11 (59): 144—147. (In Russ.).

3. Alekseev, A. A. (2013b). Emotional-value orientation as the most important factor in literary criticism by Yu. I. Aikhenvald. Human capital, 11 (59): 97—101. (In Russ.).

4. Alekseev, A. A. (2014). Artistic imagery and its role for the immanent method of literary criti-cism by Yu. I. Aikhenvald. Bulletin of the Surgut State Pedagogical University. 5 (32): 68—72. (In Russ.).

5. Alekseev, A. A. Literary-critical essays by Yu. I. Aikhenvald “Silhouettes of Russian Writers”: PhD. Diss. Kolomna, 2000. 168 p. (In Russ.).

6. Azarov, Yu. A. (2022). Yuri Aikhenvald: transformation of views. Bulletin of Kostroma State University, 28 (2): 135—140. (In Russ.).

7. Kochergina, I. V. (2016). Evolution of the critical method of Yu. I. Aikhenvald in the emigrant period. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 12 (66)/2: 27—30. (In Russ.).

8. Kochergina, I. V. (2017). On the issue of assessing the Russian revolution in the criticism and journalism of Yu. I. Aikhenvald. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and prac-tice, 11 (77)/3: 25—30. (In Russ.).

9. Kochergina, I. V. (2019). The work of I. S. Shmelev in the 1920s as assessed by Yu. I. Aikhenvald (based on materials from the emigrant press). New Russian humani-tarian studies, 14: 70. (In Russ.).

10. Kostrigin, A. A. (2021). Ideas of the psychology of creativity in the literary criticism of Yu. I. Aikhenvald. In: Differential psychology and psychophysiology today: abilities, education, professionalism: materials of the International conference dedicated to the 125th anniversary of the birth of an outstanding domestic psychologist Boris Mikhai-lovich Teplov. Moscow. 130—134. (In Russ.).

11. Losev, A. F. (2015). At the turn of eras: works of the 1910s — early 1920s. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. 1078 p. ISBN 978-5-89826-435-2. (In Russ.).

12. Markov, P. A. (1974). About the theater, 4 (1). From the history of Russian and Soviet thea-ter volumes. Moscow: Art. 542 p. (In Russ.).

13. Murzina, I. Ya. Creativity of Yu. I. Aikhenvald in the pre-October period: features of worldview and literary criticism: author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Chelyabinsk, 1996. 24 p. (In Russ.).

14. Obukhova, E. A. (2019). Naturalism in art in the polemic between V. V. Nabokov and Yu. I. Aikhenvald. Bulletin of the Vologda State University. Series: Historical and phil-ological sciences, 4 (15): 77—80. (In Russ.).

15. Ripping, M. Literary criticism of Yu. I. Aikhenvald during the period of emigration: PhD. Diss. Ivanovo, 2003. 187 p. (In Russ.).

16. Smirnov, K. V. (2019). Yu. I. Aikhenvald and his “Goncharov” (about the specifics of interpretation). Notes of a scientist, 5 (39): 113—117. (In Russ.).

17. Taho-Godi, E. A. (2020a). A. F. Losev and Yu. I. Aikhenvald: on the history of biographical and aesthetic convergences. Questions of Philosophy, 9: 150—165. DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2020-9-150-165. (In Russ.).

18. Taho-Godi, E. A. (2020b). Pushkin in the philosophical and aesthetic system of Yu. I. Aikhenvald. Problems of historical poetics, 18 (3): 171—189. DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2020.8223. (In Russ.).

19. Taho-Godi, E. A. (2020c). Yu. I. Aikhenvald and P. M. Bicilli: reconstruction of philosophical and aesthetic dialogue. Literary fact, 2 (16): 322—336. DOI: 10.22455/2541-8297-2020-16-322-336. (In Russ.).

20. Taho-Godi, E. A. (2021a). “Natural symbolism” by Yuli Aikhenvald (on the issue of the aesthetic method). In: Russian literature and journalism in the pre-revolutionary era: forms of interaction and methodology of analysis. Moscow. 188—203. DOI: 10.22455/978-5-9208-0661-1-188-203. (In Russ.).

21. Taho-Godi, E. A. (2021b). Philosophical background of literary criticism: the case of Yu. I. Aikhenvald. In: Writers and critics of the first half of the twentieth century: predecessors, followers (unforgotten and forgotten names): collective monograph for the anniversary Professor M. V. Mikhailova. Moscow. 428—442. DOI: 10.21146/0042‒8744‒2020‒9-150-165. (In Russ.).

22. Taho-Godi, E. A. (2022). Russia and Europe: Yuri Aikhenvald about the historiosophy of F. M. Dostoevsky. Philosophical Journal, 15 (4): 123—135. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-4-123-135. (In Russ.).

23. Taho-Godi, E. A. (2023). Critic about criticism: Julius Aikhenvald about Apollo Grigoriev. Russian Literature, 1: 32—36. DOI: 10.47639/0868-9539_2023_1_32. (In Russ.).

24. Vinogradov, Yu. M., Radishcheva, O. A., Shingareva, E. A. et. al. (2005). Moscow, Art Thea-ter in Russian theater criticism: 1898—1905. Moscow: Artist. Director. Theater. 639 p. ISBN 5-87334-087-0. (In Russ.).

25. Zaitsev, B. K. (1993). Yu. I. Aikhenvald. In: Works, 3 (2) volumes. Moscow: Fiction; Terra. 407—411. (In Russ.).

26. Zuev, D. V. “Immanent criticism” of Yu. I. Aikhenvald of the pre-emigrant period: the problem of the writer and the reader: author’s abstract of PhD. Diss. Moscow, 2006. 30 p. (In Russ.).