Associative analysis of the painting by G. Moro “Salome, dancing before Herod” in the novel by J.-K. Huysmans “Against Nature”
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-2-269-285
Abstract
The phenomenon of the “symbolic image” is examined using the example of the flower in Salome’s hand in Gustave Moreau’s painting “Salome Dancing before Herod” and the lotus in Salome’s hand in J.-K. Huysmans’ novel “Against the Grain.” The history of the terms ‘imago’, ‘archetype’, and ‘symbolic image’ in psychoanalysis is traced, as well as the influence of these psychoanalytic concepts on the perception of imagery in literature and painting. The relevance of the study lies in the enduring interest of literary scholars in issues related to the interplay between psychoanalysis and literature, as well as the theme of ekphrasis in literature. It is demonstrated that one of Moreau’s receptions of the “flower in Salome’s hand” became the lotus in Salome’s hand in Huysmans’ novel “Against the Grain.” It is established that Huysmans perceives Moreau’s famous phytomorph primarily as an unconscious concept of evil, anxiety, pain, illustrating his reasoning with vivid associations related to the perception of the flower in Moreau’s work. In conclusion, the author of the article points out that the imago-images of the “flower in Salome’s hand” and “lotus in Salome’s hand” become the starting impulse for creating an archetype that generates various new versions of “Salome’s flowers,” comparing lotuses and lilies in the works of H. del Casal, Elisa, and O. Wilde.
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project number 23-28-00317
About the Author
S. G. Gorbovskaya
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana G. Gorbovskaya, Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Department of French
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Álvaro González, L. C. (2018). Neurological study of the decadent novel À rebours (Against the grain) by Joris-Karl Huysmans. In Neurosciences and History, 6 (4): 125—137.
2. Autukhovich, T. E. (2019). Ekphrasis as a metatext (on the example of the story by I. S. Turgenev “Three Portraits”). Russian Philology: scientific notes of the Smolensk State University, 19: 258—270. (In Russ.).
3. Barkovskaya, A. (2017). Novel by J. K. Huysmans “On the contrary”: description of paintings in the work as a way of artistic decoration of the text. In: In the collection: Problems and prospects of modern science. Collection of articles of the XVIII International Scientific and Practical Conference. Stavropol: Logos. 3—9. (In Russ.). Court-Perez, F. (1987).
4. Joris-Karl Huysmans. A Rebours. Paris: PUF. 125 p. (In Paris.).
5. Gaillard, F. (1980). A Rebours, ou l’inversion des signes. L’esprit de décadence. Colloque de Nantes, 1. Paris: Librairie Minard. 129—140. (In Paris.).
6. Gallot, H.-M. (1954). Explication de Huysmans. Paris: Agence Parisienne de Distribution. 202 p. (In Paris.).
7. Jung, C. G. (1974). General aspects of dream psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 23—66.
8. Jung, K. G. (2002). On the relation of analytical psychology to works of fiction. In: In the collection: Classical psychoanalysis and fiction. St. Petersburg: Peterinsk. 106—130. (In Russ.).
9. Jung, K. G. (2002). Problems of the soul of our time. St. Petersburg: Peter. 352 p. ISBN 5-318- 00683-3. (In Russ.).
10. Jung, K. G., Neumann, E. (1998). Psychoanalysis and art. Moscow: Refl-book, Wakler, 1998. — 304 p. (In Russ.).
11. Jung, K. G. (1994). Symbols and metamorphoses. Libido. Moscow: East European Institute of Psychoanalysis. 414 p. (In Russ.).
12. Karaulov, Yu. (1999). Associative analysis: a new approach to the interpretation of a literary text. In: In the collection: Materials of the IX Congress of MAPRYAL. Bratislava. Moscow: Mezhdunar. Assoc. of teachers of Russian Language and Literature. 151— 186. (In Russ.).
13. Kugler, P. (2005). Alchemy of discourse. Image, sound and the psychic. Moscow: PER SE. 224 p. (In Russ.).
14. Lacan, J. (2019). The mirror stage and its role in the formation of the Ego function. Psychoanalysis. Available at: https://psychoanalysis.by/2019/03/26/статья-ж-лаканстадия-зеркала-и-ее-рол/ (accessed 02/22/2023). (In Russ.).
15. Lobet, M. (1960). Huysmans ou le témoin écorché. Lyon-Paris: Editeur Emmanuel Vitte. 146 p. (In Paris.).
16. Lotman, Yu. M. (2002). Portrait. In: Articles on the semiotics of culture and art. St. Petersburg: Academic Project. 349—375. ISBN 5-7331-0184-9. (In Russ.).
17. Mishacheva, I. (2020). Landscape of symbolism and myth. “Sacred Groves” by Gustave Moreau. In the collection: Slavic readings. Collection of materials of the international scientific conference of the Institute of Slavic Culture, 2 VII: 63—83. (In Russ.).
18. Monférier, J. (1980). Des Esseintes et Baudelaire. Dans L’esprit de décadence. Colloque de Nantes, 1. Paris: Librairie Minard. 107—113. (In Paris.).
19. Monferier,J. (1978). L’Imagination dans ÀRebours. Revue dessciences humaines, XLIII (170— 171): 231—236. (In Paris.).
20. Nezhinskaya, R. (2018). Salome. The image of a femme fatale who did not exist. Moscow: New Literary Review. 256 p. ISBN 978-5-444-80920-4. (In Russ.).
21. Psychoanalytic terms and concepts. (2000). Moscow: Independent firm “Klass”. 304 p. ISBN 0-300-04701-0. (In Russ.).
22. Reizov, B. G. (1969). Zola. A French novel of the XIX century. Moscow: Higher School. 272—298. (In Russ.).
23. Rymar, N. T. (2018). The invisible in the visible. Isolation and meaning generation in an aesthetic event. Mirgorod, 2 (12): 101—114. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Gorbovskaya S.G. Associative analysis of the painting by G. Moro “Salome, dancing before Herod” in the novel by J.-K. Huysmans “Against Nature”. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(2):269-285. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-2-269-285
Views:
400
Email this article 