Actualization of Ancient Images in Works of Contemporary Playwrights
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-2-303-320
Abstract
The article explores the reception of ancient imagery in contemporary playwrights’ works. The study focuses on the plays “Besieged” by E. Grishkovtsev, “Two Wives of Paris” by E. Isaeva, and “Micropolis” by E. Vodolazkin. A comprehensive analysis of these works is conducted to examine the modernization of ancient images, identifying intertextual connections and individual stylistic features in the use of precedent phenomena by different playwrights. The novelty of the research lies in tracing the discursive properties of motifs and images rooted in ancient culture and reimagined in contemporary plays. The analysis demonstrates how contemporary playwrights' engagement with familiar material enriches the semantic field of new works, offering fresh perspectives on eternal themes and exploring new and unexpected connections between the past and present, myth and reality. This study is relevant for the study and development of cultural dialogue across different epochs and communities. The authors conclude that in contemporary dramaturgy, ancient images possess significant discursive potential and serve as a means of artistic exploration of modern reality.
About the Authors
A. Yu. MeshchanskyRussian Federation
Alexander Yu. Meshchansky, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Literature and the Russian
Arkhangelsk
L. A. Savelova
Russian Federation
Lyubov A. Savelova, Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Literature and the Russian
Arkhangelsk
References
1. Anokhina, A. V. (2018). Interpretation of the ancient myth in R. Merle’s plays “Sisyphus and Death” and “New Sisyphus”. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 12—3 (90): 427—431. DOI: 10.30853/filnauki.2018-12-3.1. (In Russ.).
2. Averintsev, S. S. (2004). The image of antiquity. St. Petersburg: ABC Classics. 480 p. ISBN 5-352-00742-1. (In Russ.).
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (2000). Collected works: in 7 volumes, 2. Moscow: Russian Dictionaries. 798 p. ISBN 5-93259-013-0. (In Russ.).
4. Fedoseeva, T. V. (2009). Reception of ancient mythology in early Russian drama (the second half of the XVII — first half of the XVIII century). In: Philological studies: collection of scientific articles, VII. Minsk: BSU. 137—145. (In Russ.).
5. Fedoseeva, T. V. (2008). Reception of ancient mythology in Russian drama of the late XX — early XXI centuries. In: Scientific works of the Department of Russian Literature of BSU, V. Minsk: Riga BSU. Available at: http://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/34988(accessed 27.01.2024). (In Russ.).
6. Fromm, E. (2021). The art of loving. Moscow: AST Publishing House. 221 p. ISBN 978-5- 17-084593-4. (In Russ.).
7. Golosovker, Ya. E. (2010). Favorites. The logic of myth. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives. 496 p. ISBN 978-5-98712-045-3. (In Russ.).
8. Karbivnichaya, M. G. (2014). The originality of the artistic solution to the problem of personal self-identification in the play by Evgeny Grishkovets “The Siege”. Ural Philological Bulletin, 5: 237—245. (In Russ.).
9. Kazmina, N. Yu. (2009). “Ancient adventure” of the Russian stage. Questions of the theater, 1/2: 107—168. (In Russ.).
10. Kislova, L. S. (2015). The ancient myth in the Russian “New drama” of the turn of the XX— XXI centuries. Philology and Culture, 4 (42): 221—226. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.9.12910. (In Russ.).
11. Lipovetsky, M. (2012). Performances of violence: Literary and theatrical experiments of the “New Drama”. Moscow: New Literary Review. 376 p. ISBN 978-5-86793- 943-4. (In Russ.).
12. Losev, A. F. (2005). Ancient literature: textbook for higher education. Moscow: Chero: Omega-L. 543 p. ISBN 5-98119-389-1. (In Russ.).
13. Makhinina, N. G., Nasrutdinova, L. H. (2020). Past — present — future in the “Petersburg dramas” by E. Vodolazkin. Philology and Culture, 1 (59): 183—188. DOI: 10.26907/2074-0239-2020-59-1-183-188. (In Russ.).
14. Meletinsky, B. M. (2000). Poetics of myth. Moscow: Oriental Literature. 407 p. ISBN 5-02- 017878-0. (In Russ.).
15. Meshchansky, A. Yu. (2018). The existence of the “average man” in the problematic field of modern Russian drama. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 11 (1): 39—43. DOI: 10.30853/filnauki.2018-11-1.8. (In Russ.).
16. Meshchansky, A. Yu., Savelova, L. A. (2022). Great Patriotic War in Modern Dramatic Discourse. Nauchnyi dialog, 11 (3): 284—300. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-3-284-300 (In Russ.).
17. National codes of European literature in the diachronic aspect: antiquity — modernity: a collective monograph. (2018). Nizhny Novgorod: DECOM. 626 p. ISBN 978-5-89533- 398-3. (In Russ.).
18. Paradigms of cultural memory and constants of national identity: a collective monograph. (2020). Nizhny Novgorod: Publishing House of N. I. Lobachevsky National State University. 710 p. ISBN 978-5-91326-564-7. (In Russ.).
19. Propp, V. Ya. (1957). Preface. In: Folk Russian tales of A. N. Afanasyev: in 3 volumes, 1: Moscow: Goslitizdat. III—XVI. (In Russ.).
20. Rudnev, P. A. (2018). Drama of memory. Essays on the history of Russian drama. 1950—2010. Moscow: New Literary Review. 496 p. ISBN 978-5-4448-0768-2. (In Russ.).
21. Tahoe-Godi, A. A. (1989). Greek mythology. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 304 p. ISBN 5-210-00152-0. (In Russ.).
22. Trubochkin, D. V. (2012). The unbearable weight of fate. “Medea” J. Anuya at the theater named after Evg. Vakhtangova. Questions of the theater, 1/2: 93—106. (In Russ.).
23. Vislova, A. V. (2009). Russian Theater at the break of epochs: the turn of the XX—XXI centuries. Moscow: University Book. 272 p. ISBN 978-5-98699-050-7. (In Russ.).
24. Yakimova, Zh. V. (2008). An ancient play on the St. Petersburg stage at the turn of the XIX— XX centuries and the production of “Antigone” at the Alexandrinsky Theater in 1906. Izvestiya RSPU named after A. I. Herzen, 86: 153—159. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Meshchansky A.Yu., Savelova L.A. Actualization of Ancient Images in Works of Contemporary Playwrights. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(2):303-320. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-2-303-320