Shakespearean Theatre in Criticism and Journalism of Petr Boborykin

The aim of the study is to analyze the functions and forms of Boborykin’s references to Shakespeare’s dramatic heritage and determine the extent of Shakespearean theatre’s influence on the formation of the writer’s creative system. The material consists of feuilletons and articles by P. D. Boborykin for the journals “Library for Reading” (1861, 1862), “Case” (1871), “Word” (1878), publications in the newspapers “New Time” (1876), “Theatrical World” (1887), as well as the book “Theatrical Art” (1872) and the memoirs “For Half a Century” (1929, 1965). It is shown that in his feuilleton publicism, Boborykin turns to Shakespeare to criticize the contemporary theatre in all its manifestations — from the quality of plays, the choice of repertoire by theatre administration, acting, to the level of the audience. When evaluating A. N. Ostrovsky’s dramaturgy, the writer uses criteria developed by himself for analyzing Shakespearean theatre. Boborykin does not recognize historicism in artistic texts due to the author’s inability to be unbiased in reproducing the realities of the depicted era. In relation to Shakespeare’s plays, the writer introduces the term “universal human nature”, implying the reflection by the playwright of his contemporary reality in the settings of the chosen era. Boborykin reproaches A. N. Ostrovsky for an abundance of epic elements which, in his opinion, are unacceptable in dramaturgical art. Shakespeare’s works became the aesthetic, artistic, and philosophical foundation for the writer’s system of evaluating theatrical art.

1. Amfiteatrov, A. V. (1910). Masks of Melpomene. Moscow: Tipo-lit. T-va Vladimir Chicherin. 280 p. (In Russ.).

2. Andreeva, V. G. (2023). Correspondence between L. N. Tolstoy and P. D. Boborykin: from letters of the 1860s to election to the academy. Bulletin of the Ivanovo State University, 3: 5—15. (In Russ.).

3. Efremenko, O. S. (2015). The polemic of “primary” and “secondary” cultures in the first reviews of the Russian press on the work of M. Maeterlinck. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts, 30: 60—67. (In Russ.).

4. Ermolaeva, N. L. (2018). P. D. Boborykin on the historical dramaturgy of A. N. Ostrovsky. Bulletin of the Ivanovo State University, 1 (18): 11—18. (In Russ.).

5. Ermolaeva, N. L. (2023). Russian criticism and Soviet literary criticism on the epic drama of A. N. Ostrovsky. Bulletin of Kostroma State University, 29 (S): 85—96. DOI: 10.34216/1998-0817-2023-29-S-85-96. (In Russ.).

6. Evdokimova,A. S. (2016). Perception of G. Ibsen’s dramaturgy by Russian criticism of the late XIX — early XX century. Bulletin of Ryazan State University named after S. A. Yesenin, 4 (53): 107—115. (In Russ.).

7. Karaulov, Yu. N. (2010). Russian language and linguistic personality. Moscow: LKI Publishing House. 264 p. ISBN 978-5-382-01071-7. (In Russ.).

8. Kolesnikova, E. V. (2022). Journalistic activity of P. D. Boborykin (Library for Reading magazine). Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Moscow. 30 p. (In Russ.).

9. Meleshkova, O. A. (2005). Theatricality in Russian prose of the second half of the XIX century (I. S. Turgenev, M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin, P. D. Boborykin). Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Kolomna. 28 p. (In Russ.).

10. Pisemsky, A. F. (1936). Letters. Moscow; Leningrad: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 967 p. (In Russ.).

11. Rovda, K. I. (1965). Years of reaction. In: Shakespeare and Russian culture. Moscow: Nauka. 627—698. (In Russ.).

12. Samsonova, N. A. (2015). Foreign classics as a precedent text in P. D. Boborykin’s journalism (on the example of P. D. Boborykin’s feuilletons in the magazine “Library for Reading”). Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, 2 (2): 209—213. (In Russ.).

13. Shcheblykin, S. I. (2002). Novels of P. D. Boborykin in the context of Russian prose of the second half of the XIX century. Tambov: Tambov State University named after G. R. Derzhavin. 259 p. (In Russ.).

14. Teng, I. (1933). Philosophy of art. Moscow: OGIZ; IZOGIZ. 446 p. (In Russ.).

15. Zhatkin, D. N., Ryabova, A. A. (2013). S. F. Uvarov’s essay “Marlowe, one of Shakespeare’s predecessors” (1859) as the first experience of literary and critical understanding of the work of the English playwright in Russia. The world of science, culture, and education, 4 (41): 20—22. (In Russ.).