Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Concept of PRIDE in Comic Discourse: Axiological Approach

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-6-60-77

Abstract

This article examines the peculiarities of the actualization of the concept of PRIDE within comic discourse from the perspective of axiological linguistics. It determines the value status of the phenomenon under consideration based on an analysis of definitions from dictionaries spanning various years and relevant literature. The study demonstrates the evolution of attitudes toward pride and arrogance within English-speaking linguistic culture. It explores the concept’s connections with related phenomena such as arrogance, vanity, and snobbery. A four-step axiological analysis is conducted to investigate the features of the actualization of the concept of PRIDE in comic discourse. The research material comprises over 70 stand-up comedy performances and 700 episodes of situational comedies. It is established that the textual actualization of the category of pride or arrogance is typically accompanied by audience laughter or off-screen laughter. The study reveals that ridicule is directed at an inflated or unwarranted self-assessment of greatness and a sense of superiority over others. Three primary types of superiority are distinguished: intellectual, physical, and social. Furthermore, it is noted that pride/arrogance is evaluated negatively either through the outcomes it produces or through the demonstration of its unwarranted manifestations. The main linguistic means for actualizing the concept of PRIDE are identified. Thus, self-assessment of greatness is realized through hyperbolization of one’s abilities, while the sense of superiority over others is represented through various linguistic devices.

About the Author

A. I. Bochkarev
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation

ArsentiyI. Bochkarev - PhD in Philology, Head of the Department of Foreign Languages of Technical Faculties 

Scopus AuthorID: 57205475245

Novosibirsk



References

1. Aristotle. Nicomachean ethics. Available at: http://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Aristotel. Nikomakhova.pdf (accessed 10.06.2024). (In Russ.).

2. Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: a semantic and pragmatic analysis. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 238 p. ISBN 311017068X.

3. Brower, R. A. (1963). Light and Bright and Sparkling: Irony and Fiction in Pride and Prejudice. In: Jane Austen: A Collection of Critical Essays. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs. 62—75.

4. Brown, C. (2005). Out With the Old Deadly Sins, In With the New. Scotsman (Edinburgh), February 7.

5. Brown, J. P. (1979). Jane Austen’s novels Social change and literary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 185 p.

6. Dyson, M. E. (2006). Pride: The Seven Deadly Sins. New York: Oxford University Press. 160 p. ISBN 311017068X.

7. Gorer, G. (1955). Exploring English Character. New York: Criterion Books. 483 p.

8. Gorer, G. (1965). The myth of Jane Austen. In: The World of Psychoanalyses. New York: Art and Psychoanalysis. 218—225.

9. Karasik, V. I. (2002). Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena. 477 p. ISBN 5-7333-0143-0. (In Russ.).

10. Karasik, V. I. (2019). The language spiral: values, signs, motives. Moscow: Gnosis. 424 p. ISBN 978-5-94244-062-6. (In Russ.).

11. Kudryashova, O. M. (2007). The artistic embodiment of the concept of “pride” in the novels of Jane Austen. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Nizhny Novgorod. 20 p. (In Russ.).

12. Kulinich, M. A. (1999). Linguoculturology of humor (based on the material of the English language). Samara: Publishing House of SamSPU. 181 p. ISBN 5-8428-0451-4. (In Russ.).

13. Lascelles, M. (1939). Jane Austen and Her Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 225 p.

14. Lloyd, M. (2011). Miss Grimshaw and the White Elephant: Categorism in a risque humor competition. Humor, 24 (1): 63—86.

15. Lyman, S. M. (1989). The Seven Deadly Sins: Society and Evil. New York: General Hall. 355 p.

16. Malakhova, S. A. (2009). Personal and emotional concepts of “pride” and “shame” in Russian and English linguistic cultures. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Volgograd. 24 p. (In Russ.).

17. Maryanchik, V. A. (2013). Axiological character and evaluativeness of the media-political text. Moscow: URSS. 272 p. ISBN 978-5-397-03976-5. (In Russ.).

18. Polonskaya, O. Y. (2011). Emotional and ethical concepts of pride and humiliation in the English language consciousness. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Irkutsk. 21 p. (In Russ.).

19. Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company. 284 p.

20. Serebrennikova, E. F. (2011). Key concepts of axiological analysis. In: Linguistics and axiology: ethnosemiometry of value meanings. Moscow: THESAURUS. 27—40. ISBN 978-5-98421-117-8. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Bochkarev A.I. Concept of PRIDE in Comic Discourse: Axiological Approach. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(6):60-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-6-60-77

Views: 166


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)