Gottlieb Siegfried Bayer and Classical Latin Poetry in Scholarly Debate on Early History of Ancient Rus

This article is dedicated to a stylistic feature of 17th-century scholarly texts, namely the incorporation of poetic quotations into polemical scientific discourse, which enhances the expressiveness of evaluations concerning opponents and their concepts. An analysis of Gottlieb Bayer's texts is conducted. A number of works by the academician of the Imperial Academy of Sciences, Gottlieb Siegfried Bayer (1694–1738), focus on the early history of Ancient Rus. In preparing these works, Bayer extensively relied on ancient historical sources, and his articles were written in Latin, which naturally involved the traditions of classical literature in discussions pertaining to the historical issues of early Rus. This publication examines quotations and reminiscences from classical Latin poetry introduced by G. S. Bayer in his article “Origines russicae” (“The Origins of the Russians,” posthumously published in 1741). The poetic interpolations within the scholarly text serve as elements of the author’s style and fulfill two purposes. Firstly, they are utilized by the author to illustrate his assertions, lending emotional depth to academic reasoning and subtly indicating the breadth of his intellectual horizon, which enhances the perception of the scholarly reliability of his work. Secondly, they sustain Bayer’s polemical stance towards certain established historical concepts of his time, allowing for a sharp critical tone that accentuates the polemical fervor without resorting to personal attacks.

1. Ananyich, B. V., Paneyakh, V. M. (2006). Historical science in the Academy and academic institutions of St. Petersburg. Proceedings of the Joint Scientific Council on Humanitarian problems and historical and cultural heritage, 2005: 15—47. (In Russ.).

2. Dvornichenko, A. Yu., Rostovtsev, E. A., Barinov, D. A. (2019). The experience of collective portrait of historians of the Capital University of the Russian Empire. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. History, 64 (1): 24—52. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2019.102. (In Russ.).

3. Frolov, E. D. (2006). Russian science of antiquity: historiographical essays. St. Petersburg: Humanities Academy. 604 p. ISBN 5-93762-051-8. (In Russ.).

4. Goryaev, S. O. (2017). Three poetic quotations in a scientific text: based on the article by G. Z. Bayer “Origines Russicae” (1741). In: Classical languages in the postclassical period: collection of articles. Kazan: Brig. 178—183. (In Russ.).

5. Ignatova, N. Yu., Dokuchaev, S. V. (2020). Scientific Practices and Languages of Description in 18th-Century Russia (Exemplified by the Scientifiс Pursuits of V. N. Tatishchev). Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 4: 56-65. DOI: 10.37482/2227-6564-V034. (In Russ.).

6. Iodko, O. V. Bayer Gottlieb (Theophilus) Siegfried. In: Basargina, E. Yu., Tunkina, I. V. (eds.). (2018). Scientists — fund-formers of the St. Petersburg branch of the Archives of the Russian Academy of Sciences: a brief biographical reference: A-B. St. Petersburg: Renome. 196 p. (In Russ.).

7. Klein, L. S. (2019). The dispute about the Varangians as experienced. In: Our land is great and abundant: a collection of articles dedicated to the 90th anniversary of A. N. Kirpichnikov. St. Petersburg: Nevsky Printing House. 183—200. ISBN 978-5-8071-0329- 1. (In Russ.).

8. Komyshkova, A. D., Sudakova, A. P. (2018). Subjective modality of the scientific text of the 18th century: on the issue of the formation of the specifics of the scientific style of the Russian language. Ecology of language and communicative practice, 2: 55-61. (In Russ.).

9. Korenjak, M. (2023). Latin Scientific Literature, 1450-1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198866053. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198866053.001.0001.

10. Kraus, Ch. Sh. (2011). The Language of Latin Historiography. In: Clackson, J. (ed.). A Companion to the Latin Language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 408—425. DOI: 10.1002/9781444343397.ch23.

11. Miller, G. F. (1890). The history of the Academy of Sciences of G. F. Miller with continuations by I. G. Stritter (1725—1743). In: Materials for the history of the Imperial Academy sciences, 6. St. Petersburg: Printing House of the Imperial Academy of Sciences. 635 p. (In Russ.).

12. Pekarsky, P. P. (1870). Bayer (Bayer) Gottlieb (Theophilus) Siegfried, academician in the Field of Greek and Roman Antiquities. In: History of the Imperial Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg, 1. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Language and Literature of the Imperial Academy of Sciences. 180—196. (In Russ.).

13. Platonov, R. S. (2018). Antique influences in the ethics of the early modern period: research methodology. Yaroslavl pedagogical bulletin, 6 (105): 328-336. (In Russ.).

14. Ryanskaya, E. M., Yakovleva, A. M. (2019). Expression of the author’s intention in historiographic texts. Theoretical and applied linguistics, 5 (2): 16-183. (In Russ.).

15. Simankov, V. I. Bayer and Trediakovsky : Or once again on the question of what size “The Tale of Igor’s Campaign” is writte: Report, Pushkin House, June 29, 2017. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/33722339/%D0%91%D0%90%D0%99%D0%95%D0%A0_%D0%98_%D0%A2%D0%A0%D0%95%D0%94%D0%98%D0%90%D0%9A%D0%9E%D0%92%D0%A1%D0%9A%D0%98%D0%99_%D0%98%D0%BB%D0%B8_%D0%B5%D1%89%D0%B5_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7_%D0%BA_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%83_%D0%BE_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BC_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE_%D0%A1%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%BE_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BA%D1%83_%D0%98%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B5_2017_ (date of access 12.08.2023). (In Russ.).

16. Sinchenko, G. Ch. (2023). Empire of citation. Philosophical and historical study. Part III. Modern times (before the middle of the 18th century). Bulletin of Omsk University, 28 (3): 23-30. (In Russ.).

17. Sokolov, S. V., Goryaev, S. O. (2024). “From this dispersion the Russian name”: the etymological searches of G. Z. Bayer in the context of the scholarly tradition. Bulletin of the Ural Federal University. Series. 2, Humanities, 26 (2): 166-180. (In Russ.).