Communicative-Pragmatic Properties of Addressing in Virtual Pedagogical Discourse: Insights from School Chats
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-9-149-168
Abstract
This study explores the communicative-pragmatic properties of addressing as a syntactic phenomenon manifested within virtual pedagogical discourse. The relevance ofthis topic is underscored by its integration into the scientific paradigm of discourse linguistics. The core idea of the research lies in establishing a correlational dependency among the components of the following triad: (1) the functional and goal-oriented setting of speech utterances, (2) speech strategies aimed at achieving functional communicative intentions, and (3) the material embodiment of text featuring addressing, determined by the overarching cognitive strategy of pedagogical discourse and the electronic substrate form. The empirical material consists of school chats conducted on messaging platforms such as Sferum, WhatsApp, and Telegram. This material reveals invariant characteristics inherent to addressing: its material embodiment as a word or phrase and typical functions associated with addressing. Additionally, the study identifies variable properties of addressing, determined on one hand by the institutional nature of pedagogical discourse (lexical means of addressing characteristic of Russian institutional linguoculture), and on the other hand by the electronic substrate form (the use of nicknames as forms of address, and the integration of addressing within electronic polycode texts that include, alongside verbal elements, media files and emojis).
About the Authors
T. G. Rabenko
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana G. Rabenko, Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Stylistics and Rhetoric
Kemerovo
E. S. Denisova
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elvira S. Denisova, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Stylistics and Rhetoric
Kemerovo
A. D. Chardyntseva
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alena D. Chardyntseva, Graduate student, Department of Stylistics and Rhetoric
Kemerovo
References
1. Achilova, E. L., Achilova, V. P. (2018). Features of the functioning of appeals in virtual game communication. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Russian Philology, 3: 17—28. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7278-2018-3-17-28. (In Russ.).
2. Alefirenko, N. F. (2009). The problem of correlation of speech genre and discourse. Bulletin of the RUDN. The series “Russian and foreign languages and methods of teaching them”, 2: 53—61. (In Russ.).
3. Antonova, N. A. (2007). Pedagogical discourse: teacher’s speech behavior in the classroom. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Saratov. 25 p. (In Russ.).
4. Bagna, I. (2004). Types and functions of Russian address as the naming of the addressee in different types of literature. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Moscow. 24 p. (In Russ.).
5. Chernik, V. B. (2002). Phatic speech genres in pedagogical discourse and lesson text. PhD Diss. Yekaterinburg. 197 p. (In Russ.).
6. Formanovskaya, N. I. (1989). You said: “Hello!” (Speech etiquette in our communication). Moscow: Znanie. 160 p. (In Russ.).
7. Formanovskaya, N. I. (1994). Appeal. Russian language at school, 3: 84—88. (In Russ.).
8. Galanova, E. M., Gavrin, A. I. (2022). Types of appeals in educational dialogue. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 15 (2): 402—406. (In Russ.).
9. Goldin, V. E. (2009). Appeal: theoretical problems. Moscow: URSS. 127 p. ISBN 978-5-397- 00801-3. (In Russ.).
10. Goroshko, E. I., Zemlyakova, E. A. (2017). A multiformat messenger as a genre 2.0 (using the example of the instant messenger telegram). Genres of speech, 1 (15): 92—100. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2017-1-15-92-100. (In Russ.).
11. Ivashkina, O. V. (2005). Etiquette genres in teacher’s speech. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Moscow. 16 p. (In Russ.).
12. Karasik, V. I. (2002). Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena. 477 p. ISBN 5-88234-552-2. (In Russ.).
13. Katermina, V. V. (2017). Manipulative potential of appeals in pedagogical discourse. In: Society. Integration. Education: Materials of the International Scientific Conference, 1. Rezekne: Rezekne Technological Academy. 228—237. (In Russ.).
14. Kruchinina, I. N. (1990). Appeal. In: Linguistic encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia. P. 340. (In Russ.).
15. Malashenkova, E. N. (2023). The speech genre of desire in situations of asymmetric communication (based on the material of pedagogical discourse). Transcript, 25 (1): 55—65. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Rabenko T.G., Denisova E.S., Chardyntseva A.D. Communicative-Pragmatic Properties of Addressing in Virtual Pedagogical Discourse: Insights from School Chats. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(9):149-168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-9-149-168
Views:
471
Email this article 