Mediatization of Communicative Memory and Crisis of Critical Thinking in Digital Age
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-9-189-205
Abstract
This article addresses the implications of the mediatization of communicative memory and explores the underlying causes of the crisis of critical thinking in the digital age. It focuses on the transformations within the public sphere influenced by new media. A review of discussions surrounding “new sincerity” and “new sensitivity”, as well as the roles of nostalgia in new media, is presented. The interconnections among these phenomena and their common foundations are demonstrated. The study argues that representations of the past in new media increasingly rely not on biographical or historical experiences but on replicable and “privatized” second-order simulacra created by users. Special attention is given to the issue of nostalgia, which emerges as a symptom of the subjugation of cultural and communicative memory to the logic of mediatization, characterized by extreme fragmentation of images, their emotional-affective sharpness, and the replacement of complex structures of historical reality with situational impressions. The article posits that theoretical critiques of mediatization and its effects on the public sphere are insufficient without identifying practical alternatives — namely, the most reflexive projects in both old and new media: auteur cinema, social media blogs by public historians, historical documentary dramas produced by the BBC, independent video games, and more.
Keywords
mediatization,
public sphere,
critical thinking,
communicative memory,
new sensitivity,
new sincerity
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project number 24-28-00809
About the Authors
K. V. Igaeva
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ksenia V. Igaeva, senior lecturer, Department of Social Sciences
Nizhny Novgorod
F. V. Nikolai
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Fedor V. Nikolai, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, senior research scientist
Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Artamonov, D. S. (2023). Media memory in the era of numbers. Saratov: SSU. 180 p. ISBN 978-5-292-04804-6. (In Russ.).
2. Baudrillard, J. (2015). Simulacra and simulations. Moscow: Postum. 240 p. ISBN 978-5- 91478-023-1. (In Russ.).
3. Briggs, A., Burke, P. (2020). A Social History of the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press. 346 р. ISBN 0745644945.
4. Dijck, J van. (2007). Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 256 p. ISBN 0804756244.
5. Ernst, W. (2012). Digital Memory and the Archive. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 256 p. ISBN 0816677670.
6. Fortunatov, A. N., Voskresenskaya, N. G. (2021). Digital competencies and technologies of new sincerity in the era of Web 4.0. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Literary studies, journalism, 26 (2): 276—285. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9220-2021-26-2-276-285. (In Russ.).
7. Foucault, M. (1996). The will to knowledge. In: The will to truth. Moscow: Kastal. 97—268. ISBN 5-85374-006-7. (In Russ.).
8. Gladko, M. A. (2022). Linguistic representation of the “new sincerity” and sensitivity in the media space. Terra Linguistica, 4: 7—21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18721/JHSS.13401. (In Russ.).
9. Griftsova, I. N., Sorina, G. V. (2022). Critical thinking against pseudoscience. Human, 1: 7—30. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070019072-6. (In Russ.).
10. Habermas, Yu. (2023). A new structural transformation of the public sphere and a deliberative policy. Moscow: New Literary Review. 106 p. ISBN 978-5-4448-2197-8. (In Russ.).
11. Hoskins, A. (2011). 7/7 and Connective Memory: Interactional Trajectories of Remembering in Post-Scarcity Culture. Memory Studies, 4 (3): 269—280.
12. Humbrecht, H. U. (1994). Materialities of Communication. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 447 p. ISBN 0804722641.
13. Igaeva, K. V. (2023). The politics of memory in Eastern Europe: the transformation of narratives in “old” and “new” media. Dialogue with time, 85: 369—373. DOI: 10.21267/ aquilo.2023.85.85.023. (In Russ.).
14. Issers, O. S. (2020). The facets of the “new sincerity” in modern political communication. Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: History, philology, 19 (6): 216—227. DOI: 10.25205/18187919-2020-19-6-216-227. (In Russ.).
15. Kellner, D. (2021). Technology and Democracy: Toward A Critical Theory of Digital Technologies, Technopolitics, and Technocapitalism. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 303 p. ISBN 3658317892/
16. Kuragin, D. (2023). Katectic mechanisms of culture. Sociological Review, 3: 9—52. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2023-3-9-52. (In Russ.).
17. Latour, B. (2023). Why is criticism exhausted? From facts to issues of concern. Logos, 5: 29—64. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2023-5-29-61. (In Russ.).
18. Leontyeva, T. V., Shchetinina, A. V. (2022). Combination ‘New Sincerity’ in Lexicographic Aspect. Nauchnyi dialog, 11 (6): 183—201. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-6-183-201 (In Russ.).
19. Marx, K. Engels, F. (1955). The Holy Family, or the Critique of Critical Criticism. Against Bruno Bauer and company. In: Collected works, 2. 2nd ed. Moscow: Politizdat. 3—230. (In Russ.).
20. Mureiko, L. V. “(2023). “New sincerity” and “new sensitivity” in the epistemological strategy of metamodernism. Scientific opinion, 11: 37—43. (In Russ.).
21. Nikolay, F. V., Maslov, A. N. (2024). The uncertainty of temporal boundaries in the research of historical reconstruction. Siberian historical studies, 1: 125—138. DOI: 10.17223/2312461X/43/9. (In Russ.).
22. Oleynikov, A. A. (2021). The time of history. Logos, 4: 5—30. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377- 2021-4-5-27. (In Russ.).
23. Parisi, L. (2019). Instrumental reason, algorithmic capitalism and the incalculable. New Literary Review, 4: 169—181. (In Russ.).
24. Rouvroy, A. (2013). The End(s) of Critique: Data Behaviourism vs. Due-process. In: Privacy, Due Process and the Computational Turn: The Philosophy of Law meets the Philosophy of Technology. New York: Routledge. 143—168. ISBN 9780203427644.
25. Rutten, E. (2018). “Reactionary sincerity”. New literary Review, 3: 255—263. (In Russ.). Steinhauer, J. (2021). History, Disrupted: How Social Media and the World Wide Web Have Changed the Past. New York, London: Palgrave Macmillan. 160 р. ISBN 978-3-030-85116-3.
Review
For citations:
Igaeva K.V., Nikolai F.V. Mediatization of Communicative Memory and Crisis of Critical Thinking in Digital Age. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(9):189-205. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-9-189-205
Views:
520
Email this article 