George III and American Revolution: Counter-Revolutionary Leader or Defender of British Constitution?
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-9-500-519
Abstract
This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the role of British monarch George III in the events surrounding the American Revolution. The novelty of this research lies in its exploration of the English king’s actions, which have yet to be thoroughly examined in terms of assessing the counterrevolutionary response of the metropolis to the challenges posed by the colonists, as well as the objective factors influencing his critical decisions during the American War of Independence. The author investigates the nuances of the king’s political maturation, the concept of the patriot king as articulated by Viscount Bolingbroke, and the evolution of perceptions regarding the monarchy and George III within colonial society. The motivations behind the sovereign’s specific choices during the American crisis are analyzed through the lens of domestic politics and the characteristics of imperial governance. This article departs from the traditional portrayal of the British monarch as a tyrant, as established by the Declaration of Independence, which is examined in light of its allegations against the king’s tyranny. The conclusion drawn is that, in matters of imperial relations, George III was primarily guided by parliamentary interests and only after the outbreak of war, due to his character and sense of duty, did he become one of the most steadfast and obstinate proponents of suppressing the colonial rebellion through force.
About the Author
L. V. Sidorenko
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Leonid V. Sidorenko, PhD of History, Department of History of Modern and Contemporary Times
St. Petersburg
References
1. Armitage, D. (1997). A Patriot for Whom? The Afterlives of Bolingbroke’s Patriot King. Journal of British Studies, 36 (4): 397—418. DOI: 10.1086/386143.
2. Baer, F. (2015). The Decision to Hire German Troops in the War of American Independence: Reactions in Britain and North America, 1774—1776. Early American Studies, 13 (1): 111—150. DOI: 10.1353/eam.2015.0003.
3. Bolkhovitinov, N. N. (ed.). The history of the USA. 1607—1877, 1. Moscow: Nauka. 687 p. (In Russ.).
4. Bullion, J. L. (1994). George III on Empire, 1783. The William and Mary Quarterly. Third Series, 51 (2): 305—310. DOI: 10.2307/2946866.
5. Bullion, J. L. (1999). The “Ancien Regime” and the Modernizing State: George III and the American Revolution. Anglican and Episcopal History, 68 (1): 67—84.
6. Carlton, C. (1980). Three British Revolutions and the Personality of Kingship. In: Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688, 1776. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 165— 207. ISBN 978-1-4008-5647-3.
7. Carver, L. (1977). The Restoration Poets and Their Father King. Huntington Library Quarterly, 40 (4): 332—351. DOI: 10.2307/3817356.
8. Christie, I. R. (1982). Wars and Revolutions: Britain, 1760—1815. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. 359 p. ISBN 0-674-94760-6.
9. Creviston, V. P. (2011). “No King unless it be a Constitutional King”: Rethinking the Place of the Quebec Act in the Coming of the American Revolution. The Historian, 73 (3): 463—79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6563.2011.00297.x.
10. Crosby, G. R. (1941). George III: Historians and a Royal Reputation. In: Essays in Modern English History. In Honour of William Gortez Abbott. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. 295—313.
11. Derry, J. (1976). English Politics and the American Revolution. London: J. M. Dent & Sons. 215 p. ISBN 0-460-11089-6.
12. Detweiler, R. (1972). Retreat from Environmentalism: A Review of the Psychohistory of George III. The History Teacher, 6 (1): 37—46. DOI: 10.2307/492622.
13. Duff, S. F. (1949). The Case Against the King: The Virginia Gazettes Indict George III. The William and Mary Quarterly, 6 (3): 383—397. DOI: 10.2307/1919983.
14. Fisher, S. G. (1907). The Twenty-Eight Charges against the King in the Declaration of Independence. The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 31 (3): 257—303.
15. Fursenko, A. A. (1960). The American bourgeois revolution of the XVIII century. Moscow; Leningrad: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 152 p. (In Russ.).
16. Fursenko, A. A. (1978). The American Revolution and the education of the USA. Leningrad: Nauka. 416 p. (In Russ.).
17. Gruber, I. D. (1965). Lord Howe and Lord George Germain, British Politics and the Winning of American Independence. The William and Mary Quarterly. Third Series, 22 (2): 225—243. DOI: 10.2307/1920697.
18. Gunn,J.A.W. (1974). Influence, Parties and theConstitution : Changing Attitudes, 1783—1832. The Historical Journal, 17 (2): 301—328. DOI: 10.1017/S0018246X00007767.
19. Guttridge, G. H. (1934). The Whig Opposition in England during the American Revolution. The Journal of Modern History, 6 (1): 1—13. DOI: 10.1086/236093.
20. Kronenberger, L. (1961). Kings and Desperate Men: Life in Eighteenth Century England. New York: Vintage Books. 298 p.
21. Liddle, W. D. (1970). A Patriot King, or None: American Public Attitudes towards George III and the British Monarchy, 1754—1776. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Claremont Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Faculty of History. Claremont: Organization of American Historians. 506 p.
22. Liddle, W. D. (1979). “A Patriot King, or None”: Lord Bolingbroke and the American Renunciation of George III. The Journal of American History, 65 (4): 951—970. DOI: 10.2307/1894555.
23. Lucas, S. E. (1998). The Rhetorical Ancestry of the Declaration of Independence. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 1 (2): 143—184. DOI: 10.1353/rap.2010.0009.
24. Marks, A. S. (1981). The Statue of King George III in New York and the Iconology of Regicide. American Art Journal, 13 (3): 61—82. DOI: 10.2307/1594285.
25. Melville, L. (1907). Farmer George. In Two Volumes, 2. London: Isaac Pitman and Sons. 317 p.
26. O’Shaughnessy, A. J. (2004). “If Others Will Not Be Active, I Must Drive”: George III and the American Revolution. Early American Studies, 2 (1): 1—46. DOI: 10.1353/eam.2007.0037.
27. O’Shaughnessy, A. J. (2013). The Men Who Lost America: British Leadership, the American Revolution, and the Fate of the Empire. New Haven — London: Yale University Press. 497 p. ISBN 978-1-78074-247-2.
28. Pleshkov, V. N. (1984). U.S. foreign policy at the end of the XVIII century: Essays on AngloAmerican relations. Leningrad: Nauka. 301 p. (In Russ.).
29. Sogrin, V. V. (2001). Political history of the USA: XVII—XX centuries. Moscow: The Whole World. 389 p. ISBN 5-7777-0117-5. (In Russ.).
30. Thomas, P. D. G. (1985). George III and the American Revolution. History, 70 (228): 16—31.
31. Waldstreicher, D. (1995). Rites of Rebellion, Rites of Assent: Celebrations, Print Culture, and the Origins of American Nationalism. The Journal of American History, 82 (1): 37—61. DOI: 10.2307/2081914.
32. Winstanley, D. A. (1912). Lord Chatham and the Whig Opposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 460 p.
33. Yakovlev, N. N. (1973). Washington. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya. 398 p. (In Russ.).
34. York, N. (2009). George III, Tyrant: “The Crisis” as Critic of Empire, 1775—1776. History, 94 / 4 (316): 434—460.
35. Yuzefovich, I. S. (1941). George Washington and the struggle for American independence. Moscow: Uchpedgiz. 140 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Sidorenko L.V. George III and American Revolution: Counter-Revolutionary Leader or Defender of British Constitution? Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(9):500-519. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-9-500-519
Views:
382
Email this article 