Landscape Sketches in Memoir Prose of 20th Century Russian Monasticism
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-10-84-106
Abstract
This study explores the role of landscape sketches in the memoir prose of 20th-century Russian monasticism, focusing on the spiritual recollections of Archbishop Nikon (Rozhdestvensky). It identifies the distinctive ideological and thematic content, imagery organization, stylistic features, and intentionality behind these landscape portrayals within monastic literary works. The analysis reveals that the primary themes conveyed through these sketches center around love for God and one’s neighbors, the action of Divine Providence, and faith in God. Key motifs include nature, beauty, childhood, joy, and happiness, with significant imagery associated with churches, monasteries, and monastic lands. The study posits that the main intention of these landscape sketches is self-reflective, manifesting in two primary vectors: (1) contemplation on the relationship between nature, its states, and human emotions; (2) reflections on the Divine essence present in nature. Furthermore, it examines the rhetorical features of landscape sketches in these memoirs, highlighting the use of religious terminology (specifically Orthodox lexicon with spiritual and moral connotations), epithets, metaphors, enumerations, and names of weather phenomena and flora. The findings conclude that the significant functions of religious landscape sketches are both meaning-making and representational.
About the Authors
A. N. SmolinaRussian Federation
Andzhella N. Smolina, Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor, Department of the Russian and Speech Communication
Krasnoyarsk
E. A. Kudryavtseva
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Kudryavtseva, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of the Russian and Speech Communication
Krasnoyarsk
References
1. Alexandrova-Osokina, O. N. (2015). Russian spiritual space in the essays of Valerian Nikonov. Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. The series “Humanities and Social Sciences”, 4: 73—80. (In Russ.).
2. Alexandrova-Osokina, О. N. (2021). Family Chronicle Traditions in Contemporary Far Eastern Literature. Nauchnyi dialog, 5: 155—168. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-5-155-168 (In Russ.).
3. Anisimova, I. N. (2010). On the question of the functional significance of landscape descriptions in the structure of a literary text. Bulletin of the Chuvash University, 4: 181— 185. (In Russ.).
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (2013). Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Moscow: Book on Demand. 444 p. ISBN 978-5-458-23202-9. (In Russ.).
5. Bicilli, P. M. (1995). Elements of medieval culture. St. Petersburg: Mithril. 244 p. ISBN 5-86457-010-9. (In Russ.).
6. Burmistrova, S. V. (2011). The specifics of the representation of the author’s self in women’s memoir prose. Bulletin of the Tomsk State Pedagogical University, 1 (113): 119— 124. (In Russ.).
7. Folimonov, S. S. (2017). The image of the sky in “Siberian stories and essays” by V. G. Korolenko. Izvestiya Saratov University. A new series. Series: Philology. Journalism, 17 (4): 440—446. (In Russ.).
8. Gosteva, T. F. (2007). Linguistic stylistic features and text-forming potential of landscape descriptions in American prose of the XIX—XXI centuries. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Barnaul. 21 p. (In Russ.).
9. Hodkinson, O., Rosenmeyer, P. A. (2013). The Study of Epistolary Narratives. In: Epistolary Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Leiden — Boston: Brill. 424 p.
10. Kalinina, N. V. (2020). Understanding the Providence of God and predestination among early Christian authors. In: Theology: history, problems, prospects: materials of the VIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference of Students, Postgraduates and Young Scientists with international participation. (December 13—14, 2019; Lipetsk Zadonsk). Lipetsk: LSPU named after P. P. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky. 50—52. ISBN 978-5-88526-980-3. (In Russ.).
11. Kiseleva, I. A. (2017). The concept of “family” as part of the concept of “childhood” and its representation in Russian and English memoir prose of the XIX — early XX centuries. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Linguistics, 4: 90—101. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2017-4-90-101. (In Russ.).
12. Lesnicheva, O. K. (2004). Evolution and poetics of “small” genres in the literature of Siberia of the late XIX — early XX centuries. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Krasnoyarsk. 22 p. (In Russ.).
13. Loshakova, G. A. (2014). Biedermeyer’s artistic prose in Austria: genres and poetics. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Nizhny Novgorod. 45 p. (In Russ.).
14. Melnikova, S. V. (2012). Memoirs of the Siberian Orthodox clergy of the XIX century and regional Siberian literature. Problems of historical poetics, 10: 67—76. DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2012.341. (In Russ.).
15. Melnikova, S. V. (2015). The space of “Spiritual gladness” and apostolic feat: the image of Siberia in the memoirs of the pre-revolutionary Orthodox clergy. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, 5 (37): 157—171. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/37/12. (In Russ.).
16. Melnikova, S. V. (2023a). Travel diaries of St. Gerasim (G. I. Dobroserdov) in the context of Russian pilgrimage literature. Problems of historical poetics, 21 (3): 7—22. DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2023.12784. (In Russ.).
17. Melnikova, S. V. (2023b). Memoirs of the Siberian Orthodox clergy of the XIX — early XX century: destinies, texts, styles: monograph. Irkutsk: IOGUNB. 240 p. ISBN 978-5-6049399-8-7. (In Russ.).
18. Mestergazi, E. G. (2006). The documentary beginning in the literature of the XX century. Moscow: Flint. 160 p. ISBN 5-9765-0184-2. (In Russ.).
19. Mestergazi, E. G. (2007). On the term “documentary literature”. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Humanities, 11 (55): 174—177. (In Russ.).
20. Mikhailova, M. A. (2015). “Non-fictional stories” by writers of the twentieth century: the problem of synthesis of fiction and documentary in the memoirs of the “New World” era of A. Tvardovsky. Bulletin of the Vyatka State University for the Humanities, 6: 96—101. (In Russ.).
21. Nogueira, A. S. V. (2019). O conselheiro/orientador espiritual Frei António das Chagas nas Cartas Espirituais: Tese (Doutorado em Letras). Sao Paulo: Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências e Letras, Assis, SP. 331 p. (In Portug.).
22. Nuzhnaya, T. V. (2022). Ideological and Artistic Originality of French Children’s Literature of 19th Century: E. d’Hervilly “Adventures of a Prehistoric Boy”. Nauchnyi dialog, 11(9): 212—226. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-9-212-226. (In Russ.).
23. Ogneva, E. A. (2022). Algorithm for interpreting the architectonics of a textual cognitive scenario in documentary prose. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University, 3: 76—79. DOI: 10.18384/2224-0209-2022-3-1106. (In Russ.).
24. Papkova, E. A. (2022). The memoir prose of Vsevolod Ivanov. Stadia Litterarum, 2 (7): 298—317. DOI: 0.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-2-298-317. (In Russ.).
25. Pavlova, S. Y. (2011). The status of memoirs in French literature of the XVII century. Proceedings of the Saratov University. A new series. The series “Philology. Journalism”, 11 (1): 31—36. (In Russ.).
26. Petisheva, V. A. (2022). Landscape in literature lessons in high school: formation of skills for working with artistic text. In: Lebedev readings: materials of the All-Russian scientific and methodological conference “Topical issues of studying language and literature at school and university”. Yaroslavl: IRO YAO; RIO YAGPU. 169—175. (In Russ.).
27. Popova, O. D. (2016). Memoirs of seminarians as a reflection of discussions about the problems of the theological school of the second half of the XIX — early XX centuries. Bulletin of TvSU. The series “History”, 2: 57—72. (In Russ.).
28. Popova, O. D. (2018). Materials of revisions of theological educational institutions as a historical source and their role in reading the memoirs of seminarians. Bulletin of Ryazan State University named after S. A. Yesenin, 1 (58): 7—17. (In Russ.).
29. Postovalova, V. I. (2012). Theolinguistics in modern humanitarian cognition: origins, main ideas and directions. Scientific and pedagogical journal of Eastern Siberia “Magister Dixit”, 4: 54—101. (In Russ.).
30. Prashcheruk, N. V. (2015). The spiritual prose of Stanislav Minakov. In: Church. Theology. History: materials of the III International Scientific and Theological Conference (Yekaterinburg, February 6—7, 2015). Yekaterinburg: Inform.-ed. EDS Department. 554—560. (In Russ.).
31. Rabenko, T. G. (2020). Invariant and variant signs of the genres of natural written speech (based on the material of the genres “personal diary”, “personal letter”, “personal note”). Genres of speech, 1 (25): 6—14. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2020-1-25-6-14. (In Russ.).
32. Sedelnikova, O. V. (2011). Alpine essays in the structure of the travel diary of A. N. Maikov. Siberian Philological Journal, 1: 33—40. (In Russ.).
33. Shevtsova, L. I. (2021). Semantic architectonics of lyrics by E. P. Rostopchina. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 14 (3): 626—630. DOI: 10.30853/phil210109. (In Russ.).
34. Smolina, A. N. (2020). Spiritual letter-remembrance as a genre phenomenon of church-religious style. Bulletin of SAFU. The series “Humanities and Social Sciences”, 1: 53—63. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2020.1.53. (In Russ.).
35. Smolina, A. N. (2022). Model of description of the speech genre “spiritual diary”: basic parameters and embodiment (stylistic and theolinguistic aspects). Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 15 (3): 800—811. DOI: 10.30853/phil20220138. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Smolina A.N., Kudryavtseva E.A. Landscape Sketches in Memoir Prose of 20th Century Russian Monasticism. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(10):84-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-10-84-106