Current Trends in Research on Russian Orthography
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-4-138-154
Abstract
This article examines contemporary studies of the Russian orthographic system. The relevance of this research is underscored by the necessity for theoretical reflection on existing scientific approaches to orthographic material. The diversity of directions, positions, and methods employed by authors in their approaches to the orthographic system is characterized. A theoretical analysis of sources, selected based on keywords from scientometric databases, has been utilized. An increasing interest in linguistic norms in the current linguistic situation of recent years is noted. Attention is given to the issues of standardization of the orthographic system during periods of social change. It is observed that recent years have seen a focus on studying the orthographic identity of the average language user. The emergence of “spontaneous” (natural) orthography is discussed. The necessity for writing to meet the demands of modern information technologies is emphasized. The influence of virtual communication on orthographic norms is identified. Overall, a synthesized overview of contemporary perspectives on Russian orthography is presented. As a result, the author concludes that there is a multifaceted nature to the directions in the study of current issues in Russian orthography. The potential for further research in the theory and history of Russian orthography, as well as methodologies for teaching it in schools and universities, is highlighted.
About the Author
N. P. Pavlova
Cherepovets State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia P. Pavlova – PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Primary Education, General and Social Pedagogy
Cherepovets
References
1. Arutyunova, E. V. (2015). Reforms of Russian spelling and punctuation in the Soviet era and the post-Soviet period: Linguistic and social aspects. PhD Diss. Moscow. 296 p. (In Russ.).
2. Avakumova, E. A. (2002). Morphemic foundations of intuitive spelling of the Russian language: based on an experiment with children aged 6—7. PhD Diss. Kemerovo. 170 p. (In Russ.).
3. Basalaeva, E. G., Ruzha, O. A., Shpilman, M. V. (2016). Russian spelling and punctuation through the prism of naive consciousness. Siberian Journal of Philology: scientific journal, 3: 59—69. (In Russ.).
4. Baudouin de Courtenay, I. A. (1963). Selected works on general linguistics, 2. Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 384 p. (In Russ.).
5. Beshenkova, E. V. (2008). Variability in spelling. Bulletin of Tambov University. Series: “Humanities”, 2 (58): 194—202. (In Russ.).
6. Beshenkova, E. V. (2016). Theory and practice of the normalization of Russian writing. Moscow: LEXRUS. 424 p. ISBN 978-5-905532-32-0. (In Russ.).
7. Bogoroditsky, V. A. (2004). Essays on linguistics and the Russian language. Moscow: URSS (Linguistic Heritage of the twentieth century). 221 p. ISBN 5-354-01021-7. (In Russ.).
8. Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., Bauckus. S. Routledge Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. Available at: https://www.routledge.com/Heritage-Language-Education-A-New-Field-Emerging/Brinton-Kagan-Bauckus/p/book/9780415995887 (accessed 09.10.2023).
9. Dich, N. Cross-Linguistic Study of Spelling in English as a Foreign Language: The Role of First Language Orthography In Efl Spelling. Available at: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/30701/nld26.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed 15.10.2023).
10. Golev, N. D. (2001). Communicative spelling of the Russian language: tasks and methods of experimental study of the spelling activity of the reader. In: Phonetics and writing in diachrony: An interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Omsk: Omsk State University. 22—31. ISBN 5-7779-0278-2. (In Russ.).
11. Golev, N. D. (2001). Non-canonical model of spelling activity (on the communicative aspect of Russian spelling). In: Language and society on the threshold of the new millennium: results and prospects: Abstracts of the International Conference (October 23—25, 2001). Moscow: URSS Editorial. 151—152. ISBN 5836003491. (In Russ.).
12. Golev, N. D. (2001). The basic principle of Russian spelling in objectivist coverage: setting problems and hypotheses. In: Phonetics and writing in diachrony: An interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Omsk: Omsk State University. 14—21. ISBN 5-7779-0278-2. (In Russ.).
13. Golev, N. D. (2004). Antinomies of Russian orthography: a monograph. Moscow: URSS. 158 p. ISBN 5-354-00735-6. (In Russ.).
14. Gvozdev, A. N. (2007). Selected works on spelling and phonetics. Moscow: URSS: LKI Publishing House. 284 p. ISBN 978-5-382-00553-9. (In Russ.).
15. Ivanova, N. K. (2011). Russian linguistic personality: the spelling of the younger generation. Notes of the Mining Institute, 193: 37—40. (In Russ.).
16. Ivanova, N. K. (2011). The Russian linguistic personality: the experience of spelling research (based on the survey of scientific and pedagogical intelligentsia). Intelligentsia and the World, 4: 77—92. (In Russ.).
17. Ivanova, V. F. (1991). Modern Russian orthography. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Publ. 201 p. ISBN 5-06-001667-6. (In Russ.).
18. Kagan, O. (2001). New Perspective on Teaching Russian: Focus on the Heritage Learner. Slavic and East European Journal, 45 (3): 507—518.
19. Kagan, O. (2005). In support of the definition of a knowledge-based heritage language: the case of the Russian language. Linguistics, education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050508668608 (accessed 23.10.2023).
20. Kharchenko, S. Y. (2016). Spelling norm: problems of implementation. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 2, Linguistics, 15 (4): 159—167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2016.4.16. (In Russ.).
21. Kretov, A. A. (2015). Russian spelling and the challenges of the computer age. Proceedings of the Voronezh State Pedagogical University, 1 (266): 174—180. (In Russ.).
22. Kuzmina, S. M. (2008). Active processes in the field of Russian writing. Modern Russian: Active processes at the turn of the XX—XXI centuries: monograph collection. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/pxveix?ysclid=lddedojunl388490895 (accessed 20.11.2023). (In Russ.).
23. Kuzmina, S. M. History and lessons of codification of Russian spelling in the XX century. Available at: https://rjano.ruslang.ru/ru/archive/2003-2/173-191?ysclid=lddei9jmie332503158 (accessed 17.10.2023). (In Russ.).
24. Leonova, J. V. (2010). The reform of Russian spelling in the light of the theory of principles of writing. Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafiev, 1 (12): 162—166. (In Russ.).
25. Mokroborodova, L. (2008). The «New Spelling» of Russian on the internet in relation to phonetics and orthography. Russian phonetics and spelling. Scando-slavica, 54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00806760802494190 (accessed 19.10.2023).
26. Nechaeva, I. V. (2012). Spelling codification today and collegiality of normative decisions. Language and social reality, 1—2 (3—4): 13—22. (In Russ.).
27. Nechaeva, I. V. Modern Russian spelling: dogma and innovations. Studia Rossica Gedanensia. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34220339 (accessed 24.10.2023). (In Russ.).
28. Panov, M. V. (1964). And yet she is good! A story about Russian spelling, its advantages and disadvantages. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 167 p. ISBN 978-5-8391-0179-1. (In Russ.).
29. Pavlova, N. P. (2014). The spelling personality of a child. Ural Philological Bulletin. Series: Psycholinguistics in education, 2: 5—13. (In Russ.).
30. Pozharitskaya, S. K. (2002). Spelling and the possibilities of its reformation. Domestic notes, 2. Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/oz/2002/2/orfografiya-i-vozmozhnosti-ee-reformirovaniya.html (accessed 16.09.2023). (In Russ.).
31. Pushkareva, L. G. (2004). Questions of the theory of Russian spelling in the light of experimental data on the practical orientation of the writer. PhD Diss. Omsk. 176 p. (In Russ.).
32. Reynolds, R. J. (2016). Russian natural language processing for computerassisted language learning Capturing the benefits of deep morphological analysis in real-life applications. Available at: https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/9685/thesis.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y (accessed 21.10.2023).
33. Rosselli, A. Come l’Italia conquista il Dodecanneso. Available at: http:// www.anpi.it/militari/rodi.html (accessed 14.10.2023).
34. Salnikova, O. S. (2016). Spelling portrait of a 5—7-year-old child. PhD Diss. Cherepovets. 217 p. (In Russ.).
35. Sebba, M. Orthography as Social Action: Scripts, Spelling, Identity and Power. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333034077_Orthography_as_social_action_Scripts_spelling_identity_and_power (accessed 17.11.2023).
36. Shcherba, L. V. (1983). Theory of Russian writing. Leningrad: Nauka Publ. Leningr. Department. 134 p. (In Russ.).
37. Shmelev, A. D. (2002). Is there a need for a new “Set of spelling rules”? Otechestvennye zapiski, 2: 56—69. (In Russ.).
38. Sorokin, A. A., Shavrina, T. O. (2016). Automatic correction of typos and spelling errors for Russian-language social media. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialogue 2016” Moscow, June 1—4. 102—113. (In Russ.).
39. Tatarintseva, E. N. (2007). The linguistic and phonological functioning of the principles of Russian orthography. PhD Diss. Barnaul. 216 p. (In Russ.).
40. Yudina, N. V. (2016). Russian spelling and punctuation in the 21st century: “Man” and “The Law”. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, 3: 227—233. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Pavlova N.P. Current Trends in Research on Russian Orthography. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(4):138-154. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-4-138-154
Views:
541
Email this article 