Anthroponymy of Crimean Italians: Identity Dynamics Through Lens of History
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-5-128-143
Abstract
This article explores the anthroponymy of descendants of Italian settlers in Crimea and its connection to the cultural and ethnic identity of Italians, which has evolved over the 20th and 21st centuries. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the peculiarities of anthroponymy among Crimean Italians from a historical perspective, particularly concerning naming practices and name changes. The research draws on data from sociolinguistic interviews conducted with members of the Italian community in 2024. The analysis is framed within an emic approach. It is shown that in the early 20th century, names of Italian origin predominated within the community, whereas during the 1940s, due to deportation and a partial renunciation of identity, the use of Italian names sharply declined. Currently, there is a resurgence of interest in Italian names, indicating a growing connection to national roots. The study concludes that the choice of ethnically marked names is linked to the process of returning to Italian cultural identity. The novelty of this research lies in its introduction of data on the list of proper names (personal names) and the dynamics of their usage within the Italian community of Crimea into scholarly discourse.
Keywords
Crimean Italian community "Cherkio",
Italian community,
anthroponymy,
ethnic identity,
Italian names,
personal name
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project number 24-28-01635
About the Author
E. D. Ivanova
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elizaveta D. Ivanova, Research Engineer, Assistant, Department of Romance Philology
St. Petersburg
References
1. Avineri, N., Harasta, J. (2021). Introduction: Exploring agency, ideology, and semiotics of language across communities. In: Metalinguistic communities: Case studies of agency, ideology, and symbolic uses of language. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 1—23.
2. Benor, S. B. (2019). Ethnolinguistic infusion at Sephardic adventure camp. In: The Routledge companion to the work of John Rickford. R. London: Routledge. 142—152. ISBN 978-04-2942-788-6.
3. Bocale, P. (2019). Language shift and language revival in Crimea. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 260: 85—103. DOI: 10.1515/ijsl-2019-2049.
4. Dzini, S. (2021). The emergence, formation and dynamics of the development of the Italian population of the Crimea of the XIX—XXI centuries. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Moscow. 26 p. (In Russ.).
5. Dzini, S., Khokhlov, N. V. (2023). Analysis of surnames of representatives of the modern ethnic group of Italians of the Crimea and their ancestors as quasi-genetic markers. Bulletin of Anthropology, 2: 308—324. DOI: 10.33876/2311-0546/2023-2/308-324. (In Russ.).
6. Giaccetti-Boyko, D. E. (2016). Italians of the Crimea. History and destinies. Simferopol: Business-Inform. 344 p. ISBN 978-5-9909227-0-9. (In Russ.).
7. Kravchenko, E. Y. (2017). Italians in Crimea: cultural memory and national identity. Culture and Civilization, 7 (5A): 457—466. (In Russ.).
8. Kuznetsova, E. V. (2011). Language and national identity. Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 3 (98): 102—105. (In Russ.).
9. Nikonov, V. A. (1974). Name and society. In: Institute of Ethnography named after N. I. Miklukho-Maklay, USSR Academy of Sciences. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 278 p. (In Russ.).
10. Rylov, Yu. A. (2006). Proper names in European languages. Roman and Russian anthroponymy. Moscow: ACT. 311 p. ISBN 5-17-038554-4. (In Russ.).
11. Samarina, M. S. (2020). The Italian Diaspora of Crimea: tasks of revival and development. In: Herzen Readings. Foreign languages: a collection of scientific papers. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of the A. I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University. 317—319. ISBN 978-5-8064-2913-2. (In Russ.).
12. Schluter, A. A. (2021). The Historical Tie that Binds: Deploying Kurdish to Index Ownership, Authenticity, Collective Memory, and Distinction within Kawaguchi’s Kurdish Metalinguistic Community. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 225–246.
13. Shishmarev, V. F., Malkevich, B. A., Sukhachev, L. N. (1975). Romanesque settlements in the South of Russia: Scientific heritage. Leningrad: Nauka Publ. 244 p. (In Russ.).
14. Terkulov, V. I. (2024). Correlation of linguistic and ethnic identification. Questions of psycholinguistics, 2 (60): 104—115. DOI: 10.30982/2077-5911-2024-60-2-104-115. (In Russ.).
15. Uryadova, A. V. (2015). Crimean Italians. An inviolable reserve. Debates about politics and culture, 5 (103): 211—222. (In Russ.).
16. Yasinskaya, M. V. (2022). Some features of the functioning of anthroponyms among Slovenes on the Italian-Slovenian border (based on field research). Questions of onomastics, 19 (3): 126—145. DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2022.19.3.033. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ivanova E.D. Anthroponymy of Crimean Italians: Identity Dynamics Through Lens of History. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(5):128-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-5-128-143
Views:
38
Email this article 