Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Stereotypical Representations of Austria and Austrians among Russian University Students: Findings from a Word Association Experiment

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-7-113-132

Abstract

This study investigates the cognitive representations and affective-evaluative reactions of Russians towards Austria and its people. A free word association experiment was employed as the primary methodological tool. The novelty of this research lies in the absence of a comprehensive analysis of this particular heterostereotype within the scholarly discourse. The respondent pool consisted of 103 students from three Russian universities. The experiment yielded 146 stimulus words and 340 individual reactions, which were systematized into seven thematic categories and three groups based on emotional valence (positive, neutral, negative). The findings indicate a predominantly positive perception of Austria and its inhabitants among the Russian respondents. However, a critical stance towards certain historical facts was noted. The analysis determined the frequency of stereotype mentions and the ratio of conventional to non-conventional associations. A significant prevalence of non-conventional associations (67%) was revealed; these were characterized by their individuality and sporadic occurrence, suggesting a non-homogeneous nature of the heterostereotype within the Russian youth cohort. A comparison of preliminary respondent profiling data with the association experiment results identified four overlapping thematic areas: “Culture,” “History,” “Language,” and “Contemporary Political and Socio-Economic Situation.” The elicited associations supplemented the image of Austria and Austrians with three additional categories: “Cuisine,” “Geography,” and “People.”

About the Author

M. A. Chigasheva
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Marina A. Chigasheva - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Professor, Department of the German 

Moscow



References

1. Boonen, U. K., Wesche, J., Awater, P. (2022). Nationalstereotype im Kulturvergleich: Deutschland im niederländischen und russischen Fremdsprachenunterricht an Schulen und Universitäten. Glottodidactica, 49 (2): 9—45. DOI: org/10.14746/gl.2022.49.2.01.

2. Chudinov, A. P. (2021). GOOD, EVIL, TRUTH, AND LIES in Russian, Ukrainian, British, and American linguistic cultures: the experience of a psycholinguistic experiment. Siberian Philological Journal, 2: 297—311. DOI: 10.17223/18137083/75/21. (In Russ.).

3. Czarnik, S. (2020). How much truth is in stereotypes? Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce), 68: 243—279.

4. Ginzburg, O. V., Zaitseva, E. A. (2023). Ethnic heterostereotypes in the worldview of Russian and American teenagers. Society: sociology, psychology, pedagogy, 4 (108): 32—38. DOI: 10.24158/spp.2023.4.4. (In Russ.).

5. Glushak, V. M. (2018). Stereotypical grounds for mutual perception of Russians and Germans. Moscow: Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. 292 p. ISBN 978-5-9228-1880-3. (In Russ.).

6. Glushak, V. M., Babkina, V. A., Gusarov, D. A. (2016). Thematic organization of stereotypes about Germans and Germany among Russian students (based on the results of a psycholinguistic experiment). In: Communication in the modern multicultual world: national and cultural specifics of discourse construction. Moscow: Russian Representative Office of Pearson Education Limited. 156—168. ISBN 978-5-9907631-80. (In Russ.).

7. Khlopova, A. I. (2024a). The content of the value of “Haus” in German linguoculture. The world of science, culture, and education, 2 (105): 467—469. DOI: 10.24412/1991-54972024-2105-467-469. (In Russ.).

8. Khlopova, A. I. (2024b). Decency in German and Austrian linguistic cultures (comparative aspect). The world of science, culture, and education, 3 (106): 485—487. DOI: 10.24412/1991-5497-2024-3106-485-487. (In Russ.).

9. Khlopova, A. I. (2024b). Methods of establishing the content of basic values (on the example of the basic value of Freundschaft (friendship)). Bulletin of the I. Ya. Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University, 4 (125): 142—150. DOI: 10.37972/chgpu.2024.125.4.017. (In Russ.).

10. Khlopova, A. I. (2025). Comparison of the value of Arbeit (labor) in German and Austrian linguistic cultures. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 3 (897): 144—150. (In Russ.).

11. Leontiev, A. A. (2007). Language, speech, speech activity. Moscow: KomKniga. 216 p. ISBN 978-5-484-00925-1. (In Russ.).

12. Litvinova, A. A., Topoeva, A. O. (2022). The content of the ethnic stereotype “Russians” according to the data of a free associative experiment. Bulletin of the N. F. Katanov Khakass State University, 4 (42): 57—60. (In Russ.).

13. Makhaev, M. R., Sternin, I. A., Rudakova, A. V. (2023). Semantic status of toponyms: verification of the hypothesis of congruence in psycholinguistic experiments. Bulletin of the Scientific Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series: Social Sciences and Humanities, 3 (6): 16—32. DOI: 10.34824/VKNIIRAN.GUMNAUKI.2023.6.3.002. (In Russ.).

14. Martinovich, G. A. (1993). The experience of a comprehensive study of data from an associative experiment. Questions of psychology, 2: 93—99. (In Russ.).

15. Ossenberg, S. (2020). Stereotype? Implizites Wissen und seine interkulturellen Ausprägungen in quantitativen Erhebungen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 305—318. DOI: org/10.1007/978-3-658-28743-6_15.

16. Pishchalnikova, V. A. (1999). Psychopoetics. Barnaul: Altai State University. 173 p. ISBN 5-7904-0080-9. (In Russ.).

17. Pischalnikova, V. A., Khlopova, A. I., Adamova, Z. G. (2024a). The Austrian-German-Russian associative dictionary of basic values. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 175 p. ISBN 978-5-02-041142-5. (In Russ.).

18. Pishchalnikova, V. A., Stepykin, N. I. (2024b). Speech action as a semantic component of communication: psycholinguistic parameters of analysis. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 2: Linguistics, 23 (3): 6—16. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2024.3.1. (In Russ.).

19. Pishchalnikova, V. A., Stepykin, N. I. (2025). Changes in Nature of Prediction in Speech Acts: An Experimental Study. Nauchnyi dialog, 14 (3): 43—61. DOI: org/10.24224/22271295-2025-14-3-43-61. (In Russ.).

20. Tovkes, M. Y. (2021). The stereotypical idea of a female politician in the linguistic consciousness of Twitter users. Bulletin of NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural communication, 19 (2): 118—132. DOI: 10.25205/1818-7935-2021-19-2-118-132. (In Russ.).

21. Tremmel, M., Wahl, I. (2023). Gender stereotypes in leadership: Analyzing the content and evaluation of stereotypes about typical, male, and female leaders. Frontiers in Psychology, 14: 1034258. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1034258.


Review

For citations:


Chigasheva M.A. Stereotypical Representations of Austria and Austrians among Russian University Students: Findings from a Word Association Experiment. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(7):113-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-7-113-132

Views: 20


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)