Eye and Head Movement Tracking in Identifying Cognitive Challenges in Acquisition of Second Language Intonation
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-9-30-47
Abstract
This study aims to explore the relationship between the semantic content of an utterance and its impact on the mental activity of individuals acquiring second language intonation. A neurolinguistic experiment was conducted to confirm the correlation between gaze direction/head movements and various cognitive tasks. The experimental framework involves a series of questions with varying intonational patterns and semantic contents. An eye-tracker was used to monitor the direction of the respondents’ gaze and head movements while they were listening and repeating a set of English utterances designed to practice various intonational patterns. It was established that at the listening and production stages when they encountered utterances, requiring significant cognitive effort to be comprehended, participants exhibited a higher number of saccades compared to utterances with a lower cognitive load. A tendency for gaze to move towards a specific area of the visual space was observed only when the utterance did not allow for multiple semantic interpretations. It was demonstrated that when participants were compelled to focus on the intonational contour of an utterance, they applied less cognitive effort to its semantic processing, which resulted in a reduction of the areas within the visual space where their gaze was fixed.
About the Authors
V. M. Glushak
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vasily M. Glushak - Doctor of Philology, Professor, German Language Department.
Moscow
N. A. Ches
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalya A. Ches - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, English Language Department № 1.
Moscow
References
1. Bandler, R., Grinder, J. (1975). Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson. Cupertino: Meta Publications. 265 p. ISBN 10 091699001X.
2. Belyakova, L. I., Dyakova, E. A. (1998). Stuttering. Moscow: V. Sekachev. 302 p. (In Russ.).
3. Buckner, M., Meara, N. M. (1987). Eye Movement as an Indicator of Sensory Components in Thought. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34 (3): 283—287.
4. Burke, D. T., Meleger, A., Schneider, J. C. (2003). Eye-movements and ongoing task processing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96 (3): 1330—1338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.96.3.1330-1338.
5. Bystraj, E. B. (2016). The formation of phonetic skills of preschoolers. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, 2: 16—21. (In Russ.).
6. Dooley, K. O. D., Farmer, A. (1988). Comparison for Aphasic and Control Subjects of Eye Movements Hypothesized in Neurolinguistic Programming. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67 (1): 233—234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.233.
7. Elich, M., Thompson, R. W. (1985). Mental Imagery as Revealed by Eye Movements and Spoken Predicates: A Test of Neurolinguistic Programming. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32 (4): 622—625.
8. Ermakova, M. A. (2013). Intonation development in preschoolers with expressive alalia. Modern problems of science and education, 2. Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=8896 (accessed 14.02.2025). (In Russ.).
9. Farmer, A., Rooney, R., Cunningham, J. R. (1985). Hypothesized Eye Movements of Neurolinguistic Programming: A Statistical Artifact. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61 (3): 717—718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1985.61.3.717.
10. Ignashina, N. M. (2020). Formation of phonetic speech skills of the German language at the initial stage of education based on information technology. In: Scientific papers of Kaluga State University named after K. E. Tsiolkovsky. Kaluga: Publishing House of Kaluga State University named after K. E. Tsiolkovsky. 607—612. (In Russ.).
11. Kanafyeva, A. V. (2016). On some features of the intonation of a rhetorical utterance. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Russian Philology, 5: 35—40. DOI: 10.18384/2310-7278-2016-5-35-40. (In Russ.).
12. Konopkina, E. S., Shkurat, L. S. (2022). Difficulties of foreigners in intonating statements in Russian and possible ways to overcome them (the initial stage of learning). Bulletin of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian studies, 3 (36): 177—181. DOI: 10.36809/2309-9380-2022-36-177-181. (In Russ.).
13. Kosenko, V. S. (2023). Formation of intonational expressiveness in stage speech lessons: from sound to word. Theatre. Painting. Movie. Music, 4: 174—196. DOI: 10.35852/2588-0144-2023-4-174-196. (In Russ.).
14. Liu H., Androsova, S. V. (2025). Prosodic research in China. Eurasian Humanitarian Journal, 2: 49—68. (In Russ.).
15. Makarenko, N. N., Naumenko, N. E. (2019). Features of the methodology of teaching foreign intonation. Modern science: actual problems of theory and practice. Ser. Humanities, 8: 72—78. (In Russ.).
16. Marconi, N., Carmo Blanco, N. Do. (2023). Eye movements in response to different cognitive activities measured by eyetracking: a prospective study on some of the neurolinguistics programming theories. Journal of eye Movement Research, 16 (2): 1—14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.16.2.2.
17. Matveev, M. (2024). Digital neuropedagogy: harnessing cognitive science and technology for educational efficiency. Journal of teaching English for specific and academic purposes, 12 (3): 693—712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP240922052M.
18. Poffel, S. A., Cross, H. J. (1985). Neurolinguistic Programming: A Test of the Eye-Movement Hypothesis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61 (3): P. 1262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1985.61.3f.1262.
19. Rogova, G. V., Vereshchagina, I. N. (1998). Methods of teaching English at the initial stage in general education institutions. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ. 224 p. (In Russ.).
20. Rogova, G. V. (1991). Methods of teaching foreign languages. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ. 287 p. (In Russ.).
21. Sharpley, C. F. (1984). Predicate matching in NLP: A review of research on the preferred representational system. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31 (2): 238—248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.2.238.
22. Sosnovtseva, T. I. (2020). Organization of independent work of first-year students on the intonation of the English language. Organization of independent work of students in foreign languages, 3: 153—157. (In Russ.).
23. Thomason, T. C., Arbuckle, T. (1980). Test of the Eye-Movement Hypothesis of Neurolinguistic Programming. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51 (1): 135—142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1980.51.1.230.
24. Urazmetova, A. V. (2023). Determining the effectiveness of teaching intonation in English at a university. Perspectives of science and education, 5 (65): 373—384. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2023.5.22. (In Russ.).
25. Vranceanu, R., Vertan, C. (2011). A fast method for detecting eye accessing cues used in Neuro-Linguistic Programming. 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing. 225—229.
26. Wagner, S. (1981). “Metaphorical” Mapping in Human Infants. Child Development, 52: 728—731.
27. Wertheim, E. H., Habib, C., Cumming, G. (1986). Test of the Neurolinguistic Programming Hypothesis That Eye-Movements Relate to Processing Imagery. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62 (2): 523—529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1986.62.2.523.
28. Wiseman, R., Watt, C., Brinke, L. T., Porter, S. (2012). The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming. PLoS ONE, 7 (7): 1—14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040259.
Review
For citations:
Glushak V.M., Ches N.A. Eye and Head Movement Tracking in Identifying Cognitive Challenges in Acquisition of Second Language Intonation. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(9):30-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-9-30-47
Views:
78
Email this article 