New Urbanonyms of St. Petersburg and Leningrad Region (2002–2024): Motivation, Classification, and Trends
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-9-48-67
Abstract
This article provides an in-depth examination of the urbanonyms that have emerged in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region between 2002 and 2024. The primary sources for this study are the minutes from the meetings of the Toponymic Commission, resulting in an analysis of a total of 996 entries. The authors propose a classification system for urbanonyms based on various motivational criteria, including notable individuals and events commemorated by these names, urban infrastructure elements, as well as geographical features and natural landscapes. The paper identifies and analyzes trends in the formation of the city’s toponymic landscape, taking into account the sociocultural specificity of the newly established urbanonyms. It emphasizes the connection between urbanonyms as markers of sociocultural identity and the processes of historical and cultural memory preservation within urban spaces. The study demonstrates that this urban environment is characterized by trends such as the use of Finno-Ugric and Ingrian names, the restoration of lost names, an ensemble approach to naming closely situated entities, and folk traditions of naming based on churches and temples. The authors conclude that the predominance of urbanonyms associated with culture, military events, and science underscores the significance of these domains for the city.
About the Authors
N. O. IlinaRussian Federation
Natalia O. Ilina - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Higher School of International Educational Programs.
St. Petersburg
M. E. Lyapidovskaya
Russian Federation
Marina E. Lyapidovskaya - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Higher School of International Educational Programs.
St. Petersburg
E. V. Busurina
Russian Federation
Ekaterina V. Busurina - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Higher School of International Educational Programs.
St. Petersburg
References
1. Protocols of the St. Petersburg Interdepartmental Commission on Names (Toponymic Commission). Available at: https://toponimika.spb.ru (accessed 06.07.2025). (In Russ.).
2. Belenov, N. V. (2019). Principles and methods of toponymic research. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 4: 224—228. DOI: 10.30853/filnauki.2019.4.46. (In Russ.).
3. Faggion, C. M., Misturini, B. (2014). «Toponímia e memória: nomes e lembranças na cidade». Linha D’Água, 27 (2): 141—157. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2236-4242.v27i2p141-157. (In Port.).
4. Golomidova, M. V. (2022). Municipal toponymic policy and issues of urban toponymy development. Sociolinguistics, 3 (11): 41—53. DOI: 10.37892/2713-2951-3-11-41-53. (In Russ.).
5. Golomidova, M. V. (2024). Northern “Mosaic”: Territorial Identity in Toponyms of Northern Cities in Ural Federal District. Nauchnyi dialog, 13 (9): 56—71. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-9-56-71. (In Russ.).
6. Golomidova, M. V., Dmitrieva, A. V. (2023b). Reflection of territorial identity in the toponymic landscape of small towns in the Urals. Questions of onomastics, 20 (2): 144—173. DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2023.20.2.019. (In Russ.).
7. Golomidova, M. V., Razumov, R. V., Goryaev, S. O. (2023a). Urban toponymy: modern politics and Naming practice. Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin. 216 p. ISBN 978-5-7996-3753-8. (In Russ.).
8. Gordova, Yu. Y. (2024). Interdisciplinary communication: an actual methodology of research in the field of toponymy. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 10: 87—93. DOI: 10.30853/phil20240507. (In Russ.).
9. Oparina, E. O., Rarenko, M. B. (2024). Urban toponyms as a socio-cultural factor and as an instrument of regional identity. Russia and the modern world, 4 (125): 205—221. DOI: 10.31249/rsm/2024.04.13. (In Russ.).
10. Razumov, R. V. (2022). Onymic policy in urban space: a problem field and prospects for normalization. Sociolinguistics, 3 (11): 120—135. DOI:10.37892/2713-2951-3-11-120-135. (In Russ.).
11. Razumov, R. V., Goryaev, S. O. (2020). Translation of regional identity in urbanonymy of Russian cities: the current state. Questions of onomastics, 17 (2): 201—219. DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2020.17.2.024. (In Russ.).
12. Stiperski, Z., Ejupi, A. (2023). Tracing the development of Kosovar and Albanian identities using urban toponyms. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 24 (3): 537— 557. DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2023.2185366.
13. Stiperski, Z., Lorber, L., Heršak, E. (2011). Identity through Urban Nomenclature: Eight Central European Cities. Geografisk Tidsskrift–Danish Journal of Geography, 111 (2): 181—194. DOI: 10.1080/00167223.2011.10669532.
14. Tkhakakhov, V. H. (2019). Identity and memory in urbanonyms of Vladikavkaz. Discourse, 5 (6): 108—119. DOI: 10.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-6-108-119. (In Russ.).
15. Volodina, T. A. (2022). The problem of stability and variability of meanings in historical toponymy. The modern history of Russia, 12 (2): 491—502. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu24.2022.214. (In Russ.).
16. Yue Cui. (2021). Theoretical foundations of building a toponymic database with a linguistic and cultural component: based on the material of Moscow toponyms. PhD Diss. Moscow. 145 p. (In Russ.).
17. Zhukova, E. D., Gilmianova, R. A. (2024). Sociocultural identity: modern theoretical approaches. Pedagogical Journal of Bashkortostan, 1 (103): 133—145. DOI:/18173292_10310.21510_2024_103_1_133_145. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ilina N.O., Lyapidovskaya M.E., Busurina E.V. New Urbanonyms of St. Petersburg and Leningrad Region (2002–2024): Motivation, Classification, and Trends. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(9):48-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-9-48-67






















