Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Plant Image in Literary Texts as an Object of Literary Analysis: A Review of Russian Scholarship (2000-2020s)

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-9-271-300

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of Russian academic works (2000–2025) on the literary representation of plants in world literature. Drawing on dissertations, monographs, encyclopedias, and scholarly articles, the study offers the first systematic overview of research examining botanical imagery with both fixed and non-fixed semantic functions. The analysis demonstrates that, since early Romanticism, plant imagery has acquired a pronounced imaginative dimension. Despite the growing prominence of polysemous botanical motifs from the 19th century onward, archetypal plant symbols persist even in contemporary texts. Key thematic clusters identified include: the study of floriography (the “language of flowers” or “selam”), floral poetic garlands and bouquets, the rose motif, the Christmas tree symbol, and unique authorial botanical constructions. The paper further presents an original analytical framework for interpreting key floral symbols — such as the rose, the fir tree, the nameless flower, the blue flower, and flowers of evil — contextualizing them within broader literary discourse. Findings indicate a significant increase in floropoetics scholarship between 2000 and 2025, signaling the maturation of this research domain. It has been demonstrated that a methodology for the study of plants is evolving, along with the establishment of a specialized terminology system. It has been found that the representation of plants has been thoroughly examined by domestic researchers; however, the field of floropoetics requires further development.

About the Authors

S. G. Gorbovskaya
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Svetlana G. Gorbovskaya - Doctor of Philology, Professor, Department of French.

Saint Petersburg



N. S. Tyrkheeva
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Nadezhda S. Tyrkheeva - PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Department of French.

Saint Petersburg



E. A. Kondratyeva
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Kondratyeva - Senior Lecturer, French Language Department.

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Aflitonova, Yu. R. (2018). Color symbols and their role in the cycle “Flowers of Evil” by Charles Baudelaire. Student forum, 1 (22): 38—41. (In Russ.).

2. Akhunzyanova, F. T., Akhunzyanov, E. M. (2018). Borge’s Rose and Rozanov’s leaf: in search of the essence of being. Sapogovskiye studii 2018. Current issues of humanitarian knowledge: a collection of scientific articles. 17—22. (In Russ.).

3. Albrecht, O. V. (2020). The image of the garden in the novel by E. Zola “The Offense of the Abbé Mouret”. Proceedings of the Saratov University. A new series. Series: Philology. Journalism, 1: 54—58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1817-7115-2020-20-1-54-58. (In Russ.).

4. Aleksandrova, M. A. (2021). The work of Bulat Okudzhava and the myth of the “Golden Age”. PhD. Diss. Nizhny Novgorod. 630 p. (In Russ.).

5. Aleksandrova, M. A., Bolshukhin, L. Yu. (2009). Mayakovsky’s roses. Bulletin of Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod University, 6(2): 18–25. (In Russ.).

6. Alekseev, M. P. (1968). Once again about Pushkin’s poem “The Rose”. Russian literature, 3: 91—115. (In Russ.).

7. Alekseev, M. P. (1972). Disputes about the poem “The Rose”. In: Pushkin. Comparative historical research. Leningrad: Nauka Publ. 326—377. (In Russ.).

8. Alekseeva, M. M. (2019). The motif of a flower in F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel “White Nights”. Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological Journal, 1 (5): 177—182. DOI: 10.22455/2619-0311-2019-1-177-182. (In Russ.).

9. Andreyushkina, T. N. (2009). German wreaths of sonnets: Tradition and experiment. Baltic Philological Courier, 7: 237—257. (In Russ.).

10. Anichkina, A. A. (2020). Metaphysical “flowers” by S. Baudelaire as a verbal means of artistic expression. In: XV Science Festival in Moscow: collection of scientific articles by students, postgraduates and young scientists of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Moscow: RUDN University: 107—115. ISBN 978-5-209-10509-1. (In Russ.).

11. Auraix-Jonchière, P., Bernard-Griffiths, S. (2017). Dictionnaire littéraire des fleurs et des jardins (XVIII—XIX siècles). Paris: H. Champion. 549 p. (In Frenc.).

12. Basmanova, E. B. (2011). Ancient floral etiquette. Floral traditions and floral etiquette in the private and public life of Russia of the XVIII — early XX century. Moscow: Bely Gorod. 416 p. ISBN 978-5-7793-2164-8. (In Russ.).

13. Bayramova, A. N. (2009). A wreath of sonnets in Russian poetry of the XX century. World literature in the context of culture, 4: 328—329. (In Russ.).

14. Begunov, Yu. (1983). Sources of S. T. Aksakov’s fairy tale “The Scarlet Flower”. Russian Literature, 1: 179—187. (In Russ.).

15. Berezkina, S. V. (1997). Pushkin’s poem “Anchar”. Russian literature, 4: 67—80. (In Russ.).

16. Blagoy, D. D. (1956). “Anchar” by Pushkin. In: Academician Viktor Vladimirovich Vinogradov on his sixtieth birthday: a collection of articles. Moscow: [b. i.]. 107—112. (In Russ.).

17. Bobok, O. A. (2015). “You are asking what my flowers say...” on the question of the meaning of flowers in the life and work of Emily Dickinson. Path of Science, 8 (18): 55—58. (In Russ.).

18. Bobok, O. A. (2016). “Being a flower is a serious responsibility...”: images of flowers in the work of Emily Dickinson. In: Genre. Style. Image. Topical issues of modern philology: an interuniversity collection of articles with international participation. Kirov: Limited Liability Company Scientific and Editorial Group “University-Plus”. 101—108. (In Russ.).

19. Bogolyubova, V. G. (1958). Once again about the sources of “Anchara”. In: Pushkin. Research and materials, II. Moscow; Leningrad: [b. i.]. 310—323. (In Russ.).

20. Borisov, S. (2019). Let's flirt, comrades! Rossiyskaya gazeta. Homeland, 5: 126—129. (In Russ.).

21. Borzykh, L. A. (2012). The floral poetics of S. A. Yesenin: classification, function, evolution. PhD. Diss. Tambov. 186 p. (In Russ.).

22. Broitman, S. N. (2008). Genre and compositional originality of A. Blok’s poem “Night Violet”. Shakhmatovsky Bulletin, 9: 233—252. (In Russ.).

23. Campmas, A. (2008). La monstruosité cachée: Huysmans et les hybrides artificiels. Séminaire «Signe, déchiffrement, et interpretation»: Les colloques “Signe, déchiffrement, et interpretation”. 111—123 p. (In Frenc.).

24. Cettou, M. (2009). Jardins d’hiver et de papier: de quelques lectures et (ré)écritures fin-de-siècle. A contrario, 11: 99—117. (In Frenc.).

25. Chistyakova, N. A. (1993). The Greek epigram. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ. 448 p. (In Russ.).

26. Chistyakova, N. A. (1996). Ancient Greek elegy. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya. 400 p. (In Russ.).

27. Chizhikova, E. V. (2020). The Christian symbolism of plants in I. A. Goncharov’s novel “The Cliff”. In: The State. Society. The Church: proceedings of the International scientific Conference. Vladimir: Arkaim Publ. 294—300. (In Russ.).

28. Chubukova, E. V. (1983). Pushkin’s poem “The Rose” (on the question of literary continuity in lyceum lyrics). In: Problems of the history of interrelations between Russian and world culture: an interuniversity collection. Saratov: Publishing House of Saratov University: 93—107. (In Russ.).

29. Coquio, C. (1986). La figure du thyrse dans l’esthétique décadente. Romantisme, 52: 77—94. (In Frenc.).

30. Dushechkina, E. V. (1995). Russian Yuletide story. The formation of the genre. Saint Petersburg: Scientific Library. 256 p. (In Russ.).

31. Dushechkina, E. V. (2002). Russian Christmas tree. History, mythology, literature. St. Petersburg: Culture of everyday Life. 414 p. (In Russ.).

32. Flowers in Russian and world literature and culture. Philological readings — 2006 (2007). Daugavpils: Academic Publishing House of the Daugavpils University “Saule”. 312 p. (In Russ.).

33. Frolova, O. V. (2019). The motive of madness in V. M. Garshin’s story “The Red Flower”. Culture and text, 1 (36): 19—27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2023-3-150-159. (In Russ.).

34. Golosovker, Ya. E. (1993). Imaginative aesthetics. Symbol, 29: 73–128. (In Russ.).

35. Golubkov, A. V. (2015). Florilegy and rhapsody: towards the classical prehistory of a romantic fragment. Bulletin of Kostroma State University, 2: 53—57. (In Russ.).

36. Golubkov, A. V. (2017). “Julia’s Garland” and gallant anthropology in the French salon culture of the XVII—XVIII centuries. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 6—2 (72): 26—29. (In Russ.).

37. Gorbovskaya, S. G. (2017). Floral motif in 19th-century French literature. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Press. 273 p. (In Russ.).

38. Gorbovskaya, S. G. (2021). The many-faced abyss. Formation of a new paradigm of the plant image in French literature of the 19th century. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. 344 p. ISBN 978-5-4469-1892-8. (In Russ.).

39. Gorbovskaya, S. G. (2023a). Inspired by the rose. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University. 168 p. ISBN 978-5-288-06352-7. (In Russ.).

40. Gorbovskaya, S. G. (2023b). The Three Fundamental Principles of the image of the Heavenly Rose in Dante Alighieri’s Divine Comedy. Nauchnyi dialog, 12 (4): 280—297. (In Russ.).

41. Gorbovskaya, S. G. (2024). The image of the “flowers of evil”: from Sh. By J. K. Baudelaire. Huysmans. The Word. Baltic accent, 15 (3): 39—54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58282/colloques.869. (In Russ.).

42. Gorbovskaya, S. G., Beynarovich, O. L., Starkova, D. D. (2024). Imagopoethological encyclopedia of author’s literary images. Flora. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publishing House. 519 p. ISBN 978-5-288-05746-5. (In Russ.).

43. Got, O. (2002). Les Jardins de Zola: psychanalyse et paysage mythique dans les Rougon-Macquart. Paris: L’Harmattan. 255 p. (In Frenc.).

44. Gracheva, I. V. (2006). Floristry in the novels of F. M. Dostoevsky. Russian Literature, 6: 20—26. (In Russ.).

45. Grafova, E. O. (2020). The Era of Art Nouveau in the literary and artistic interpretation of Maurice Maeterlinck in the context of the Hanbury Gardens, Liguria. In: Russian Manor and Europe: diachrony, nostalgia, universalism: a collective monograph. Moscow: IMLI RAS. 322—323. ISBN 978-5-9208-0623-9. (In Russ.).

46. Grishchenko, A. S. (2022). Implicit meanings of floral symbols in the novels of I. A. Goncharov. Philological aspect, 5 (85): 215—221. (In Russ.).

47. Gubareva, M. S. (2005). Themes and images of decadence: J.-K. Huysmans, O. Wilde, A. Zhid: the experience of comparative analysis. PhD. Diss. Moscow. 198 p. (In Russ.).

48. Ilchenko, N. M., Chernysheva, E. G. (2024). “The floral ornament of reality”: flowers in the picture of the world by E. T. A. Hoffman and N. A. Polevoy. Nauchnyi dialog, 13 (7): 256—275. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-7-256-275. (In Russ.).

49. Izmailov, N. V. (1927). From the history of the Pushkin text. “Anchar, the Tree of poison”. Pushkin and his contemporaries. Materials and research, XXXI—XXXII: 55—94. (In Russ.).

50. Kazankova, K. V. (2010). The phytomorphic myth in the poetics of G. G. Marquez. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 21 (202): 28—32. (In Russ.).

51. Knight, Ph. (1986). Flower poetics in nineteenth-century France. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 296 p.

52. Kosyakov, G. V. (2022). Artistic floristry in the early lyrics of M. Y. Lermontov 1828—1836. In the context of the Dialogue of traditions. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Technology and Design. Series 2: Art Criticism. Philological sciences, 2: 123—128. DOI: 10.57015/issn1998-5320.2024.18.1.2. (In Russ.).

53. Kutyeva, M. V. (2014). Conceptual substitutions and inconsistencies in Russian translations of García Lorca’s flower metaphors. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University, 24 (710): 249—259. (In Russ.).

54. Kutyeva, M. V., Torosyan, L. D. (2020). Flowers in the lyrics of Federico Garcia Lorca and their translation into Russian. In: Way of thinking: current issues of Russian-Spanish and Spanish-Russian translation: proceedings of the First International Scientific and Practical Conference. St. Petersburg: MAPRYAL. 44—49. (In Russ.).

55. Lukyanova, A. O. (2020). The interpretative potential of images of the desert, palm trees, oasis in the poems of M. Konkova, M. Y. Lermontov, K. Balmont. In: Author — Text — Reader: theory and practice of analysis: materials of the Seventh International Scientific Readings. Kaluga: Publishing House of Kaluga State University named after K. E. Tsiolkovsky. 620—625. (In Russ.).

56. Lutsan, U. (2014). “Flowers” in the idiosyncrasy of I. A. Goncharov. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 3—2 (33): 191—194. (In Russ.).

57. Lutsan, U. (2015). The semantic field “flower” in the language of Russian fiction of the second half of the 19th century. (based on the works of I. A. Goncharov, I. S. Turgenev, A. P. Chekhov). PhD. Diss. Moscow. 292 p. (In Russ.).

58. Magomedova, D. M. (2020). Night violet in Blok’s poetry: reality and symbolic connotations. New Philological Bulletin, 3 (54): 97—105. DOI: 10.24411/2072-9316-2020-00069. (In Russ.).

59. Makarov, D. (2007). “In a white crown of roses, Jesus Christ is ahead” (the meaning of the final image of A. A. Blok’s poem “The Twelve”). In: Flowers in Russian and world literature and Culture. Philological readings — 2006. Daugavpils: Daugavpils universites akademiskais APGDS “SAULE”. 18—29. (In Russ.).

60. Maltseva, T. V. (2023). The image of a palm tree in M. Y. Lermontov’s poem “Three Palm Trees” (folklore subtext). In: Russian folklore of Mordovia in the context of world culture. Saransk: Mordovian University Press. 190—196. (In Russ.).

61. Mazur, N. N. (2007). Once again about the Virgin rose (in connection with Baratynsky’s poem “Even as a Patriarch I am not ancient ...”). In: Pushkin Readings in Tartu. The Pushkin Era: Problems of Reflection and commentary: proceedings of the International Conference. Tartu: University of Tartu. 345—378. (In Russ.).

62. Mikushevich, V. B. (1998). The blue flower and the devil. In: Novalis. Heinrich von Ofterdingen; Novalis. Hymns to the night; Novalis. Spiritual songs; Bonaventure. Night vigils; Hoffmann Ernst Theodor Amadeus. The devil’s elixirs. Moscow: Terra/Book Club. 7—11. (In Russ.).

63. Mishina, D. I. (2024). The image of the deceased virgin in K. N. Batyushkov’s poetry: genesis, poetics, evolution. Bulletin of the Kaluga University. Series 2. Studies in philology, 4 (10): 69—78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-8-258-271. (In Russ.).

64. Muryanov, M. (1999). The symbolism of the rose in Blok’s poetry. Questions of literature, 6: 98—128. (In Russ.).

65. Musayeva, O. I. (2005). Floral metaphor as a fragment of the national worldview: based on the material of the Russian and Spanish languages. PhD. Diss. Voronezh. 203 p. (In Russ.).

66. Nazarov, V. N. (2021). Architectonics and symbolism of the Rose of Paradise in Dante's “Divine Comedy”. Science. Art. Culture, 2 (30): 44—58. (In Russ.).

67. Neminushchy, A. N. (2007). “Flowers” and lilies of the valley by Karamzin. In: Flowers in Russian and world literature and culture. Philological readings-2006. Daugavpils: Daugavpils universites akademiskais APGDS “SAULE”. 3—8. (In Russ.).

68. Nenarokova, M. R. (2012). The language of flowers: lilies in Russian poetry of the first half of the 19th century. In: Romanticism: facets and destinies: scientific notes. Tver: Tver State University. 83—89. ISBN 978-5-7609-0755-4. (In Russ.).

69. Nenarokova, M. R. (2013). “Selam” by D. P. Oznobishin: cultural dialogue of Europe and the East. Cultural Journal, 4: 1—8. (In Russ.).

70. Nenarokova, M. R. (2014). The language of flowers: myrtle in Russian poetry of the first half of the 19th century. In: Romanticism: facets and destinies: scientific notes: on the 100th anniversary of Professor N. A. Gulyaev. Tver: Tver State University. 18—26. (In Russ.).

71. Nenarokova, M. R. (2015). The role of the title, epigraphs and comments in the structure of D. P. Oznobishin’s book “Selam, or the language of flowers”. Journal of the Institute of Heritage, 1: 23—29. (In Russ.).

72. Nenarokova, M. R. (2021a). Grapes in the European and Russian language of flowers (XVIII—XIX centuries). Bulletin of Kostroma State University, 27 (2): 117—122. DOI: 10.34216/1998-0817-2021-27-2-117-122. (In Russ.).

73. Nenarokova, M. R. (2021b). The language of flowers: laurel in Russian poetry of the XIX century. Scientific notes of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philological sciences, 7 (2): 62—70. (In Russ.).

74. Nikolaev, S., Chernov, A. (2007). Flowers in Hamlet. In: Shakespeare, V. “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark”. Paris; Moscow: Syntax, Isograph. 374 p. (In Russ.).

75. Osipova, E. F. (1985). Henry Thoreau. Essays on creativity. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press. 128 p. (In Russ.).

76. Pastoureau, M. (2004). Une histoire symbolique du Moyen Age occidental. Paris: Seuil. 436 p. ISBN 9782020136112. (In Frenc.).

77. Pavlova, L. V. (2017). Rose and oak in the “Evening Light” by Vyacheslav Ivanov. Russian Philology: scientific notes of the Smolensk State University, 17: 30—48. (In Russ.).

78. Pavlova, L. V. (2019). Lily and rose in a summary of the flora of Vyacheslav Ivanov’s “Transparency”. Proceedings of the Smolensk State University, 2 (46): 22—34. (In Russ.).

79. Petyukina, D. S. (2023). Intertextual connections between A. I. Solzhenitsyn’s novel “In the First Circle” and V. M. Garshin’s short story “The Red Flower”. Philological studies, 26: 120—122. (In Russ.).

80. Plant, landscape and landscape images in French literature of the 19th century. (2021). Saint Petersburg: Russian State Medical University. 200 p. (In Russ.).

81. Prodanik, N. V. (2014). A book for women in antiquity and Russian lyrics of the Golden Age. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 11—1 (41): 159—162. (In Russ.).

82. Reizov, B. G. (2011). “Lily in the valley” and her fate in Russia. In: Works on comparative literature. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of the Faculty of Philology. 442—451. (In Russ.).

83. Rudakova, S. V. (2021). “The winged moment of happiness...”: the phenomenon of happiness in the lyrics of K. N. Batyushkov. Libri Magistri, 1 (15): 148—166. DOI: 10.52172/2587-6945_2021_15_1_148. (In Russ.).

84. Sakharova, E. V. (2007). Landscape topos in the Russian literature of the first the third of the XIX century. PhD. Diss. Tomsk. 241 p. (In Russ.).

85. Sapir, A. M. (2012). “A bird does not fly to him...” (analysis of A. S. Pushkin’s poem "Anchar"). Philological class, 4 (30): 103—109. (In Russ.).

86. Sashina, E. V. (2020). Pushkin and the Boys: towards the problem of literary interactions. In: Pushkin and the literary process: proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. 95—103. (In Russ.).

87. Sedykh, E. V. (2015). Symbolism of flora and fauna in the metatext of W. Blake. Language. Literature. Culture, 3: 49—68. (In Russ.).

88. Shabanova, N. A. (2021). The traditional artistic symbol: the evolution of perception (based on the symbol “rose”). In: Problems of philological education: interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Saratov: Saratov National Research State University named after N. G. Chernyshevsky. 145—151. (In Russ.).

89. Shabanova, N. A. (2022). The symbolism of the rose in A. Blok’s drama “The Rose and the Cross”. In: Problems of philological education: an interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Saratov: Saratov National Research State University named after N. G. Chernyshevsky. 129—134. (In Russ.).

90. Shabanova, N. A. (2024). The functioning of the traditional symbol “rose” in A. S. Pushkin’s poetry as an explication of the poet’s conceptual sphere. The Beginnings of the Russian World, 5: 46—51. (In Russ.).

91. Sharafadina, K. I. (2003). “The Alphabet of Flora” in the artistic language of Russian literature of the Pushkin era (sources, semantics, forms). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Institute of Printing. 309 p. (In Russ.).

92. Sharafadina, K. I. (2004). “The language of flowers” in Russian poetry and literary usage of the first half of the 19th century (sources, semantics, forms). Doct. Diss. St. Petersburg. 431 p. (In Russ.).

93. Sharafadina, K. I. (2012). Literature in the synthesis of arts. In: Phloropoethology, 2. St. Petersburg: SPGUTD. 526 p. (In Russ.).

94. Sharafadina, K. I. (2018). Selam, open up! Phloropoetics in the figurative language of Russian and foreign literature. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. 544 p. ISBN 978-5-4469-1451-7. (In Russ.).

95. Sharafadina, K. I., Prodanik, N. V. (2016). Semiosis of the metaphorical motif “book-wreath” in Greek poetry. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 13(2), 69–84. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu09.2016.207. (In Russ.).

96. Sharaya, O. V. (2005). On the national and cultural specifics of the floristic phraseology of the German and Russian languages. PhD. Diss. Moscow. 364 p. (In Russ.).

97. Shirina, S. A. (2010). On the functions of floral images in the lyrics of A. A. Fet. Culture. Literature. Language: proceedings of the Ushinsky Readings Conference. 149—154. (In Russ.).

98. Shirmina, A. O. (2021). The image of the forget-me-not in the artistic discourse of G. R. Derzhavin and M. Y. Lermontov. Proceedings of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 1 (154): 217—221. (In Russ.).

99. Shmakova, A. D. (2004). Floral symbolism in A. N. Ostrovsky’s play “The Snow Maiden”: the natural code. Philological analysis of the text, 5: 204—210. (In Russ.).

100. Shorina, E. V. (2015). Intertextual discourse on the theme of madness in V. M. Garshin’s short story “The Red Flower”. Philological aspect, 3: 98—103. (In Russ.).

101. Smirnova, A. I. (1995). Russian natural philosophical prose of the 1960s—1980s: philosophy, mythology, poetics. PhD. Diss. Voronezh. 41 p. (In Russ.).

102. Smirnova, A. I. (ed.). (2024). “The language of flowers” and flowers in language, literature and culture. Moscow: Zertsalo-M: MGPU. 504 p. ISBN 978-5-94373-550-9. (In Russ.).

103. Smirnova, A. I., Kuzub, Yu. V. (2023). Flora language as a mediator of cultural meanings translation (the subject field of the modern stage of floropoethology). Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Technology and Design. Series 2: Art Criticism. Philological sciences, 3: 74—80. DOI: 10.46418/2079-8202_2023_3_11. (In Russ.).

104. Smirnova, A. I., Raykova, I. N. (2017). Semantics of garden and forest in Russian literature and folklore: a collection of scientific articles. Moscow: MGPU. 292 p. ISBN 978-5-243-00442-8. (In Russ.).

105. Solomonova, A. A. (2019). “The Oriental Legend” by M. Y. Lermontov: “Three Palm Trees” in the context of European culture. In: The Russian word in a multicultural space: a collection of scientific papers dedicated to the anniversary of Professor G. V. Yakusheva. Moscow: Pushkin State Institute of the Russian Language. 189—196. ISBN 978-5-98269-166-8. (In Russ.).

106. Sonina, E. S. (2019). A. S. Pushkin in a board game. In: Boldinsky readings 2019: collection of articles. Nizhny Novgorod: N. I. Lobachevsky National Research Nizhny Novgorod State University. 259—286. (In Russ.).

107. Staf, I. K. (2016). Flowers of rhetoric and beautiful letters. French literature of the Late Middle Ages and Early Renaissance. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives. 246 p. ISBN 978-5-98712-651-6. (In Russ.).

108. Sugai, L. A., Malygina, I. Yu. (2013). Acrostics in sonnet wreaths. Bulletin of Vyatka State University for the Humanities, 3 (1): 128—131. (In Russ.).

109. Szilard, L. (2016). “The Rose and the Cross” by A. Blok in the light of the Rosicrucian traditions. Studia Litterarum, 1 (3—4): 235—261. (In Russ.).

110. Tarkan, N. E. (2010). Artistic and stylistic originality of M. Y. Lermontov’s poem “Three palm trees”. Education. Book. Reading: the text and the formation of reading culture in the modern educational environment: a collection of articles. 133—137. (In Russ.).

111. The Wreath of Sonnets (2006). In: The Great Russian Encyclopedia. Moscow: The Great Russian Encyclopedia. 131—132. (In Russ.).

112. Tolysbaeva, J. J. (2015). On the nature of the transformation of a wreath of sonnets in poetry at the turn of the XX—XXI centuries. Siberian Philological Journal, 1: 133—139. (In Russ.).

113. Trostnikov, M. (1997). The image of a rose in the context of Faustian culture. In: Poetology. Moscow: Grail Publ.: 166—180. (In Russ.).

114. Turbin, V. N. (1981). Three palms. In: Lermontov Encyclopedia. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia: 579—581. (In Russ.).

115. Verina, U. Y. (2016). Modern poetic anthology: genesis, typology. Scientific Notes of the Orel State University, 1 (70): 74—81. (In Russ.).

116. Volodina, A. V. (2014). The blooming South and the fading South: the symbolism of plants in the novels of W. Faulkner. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Russian Philology, 5: 92—96. (In Russ.).

117. Volsky, A. L. (2008). Hermeneutics of the symbol “blue flower” in Novalis' novel “Heinrich von Ofterdingen”. Proceedings of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A. I. Herzen. 168—175. (In Russ.).

118. Yakubovich, D. P. (1934). A note on “Anchar”. Literary heritage, 16/18: 869—876. (In Russ.).

119. Yasensky, S. Y. (1991). The role and significance of reminiscences and allusions in the poem “Night Violet”. In: Alexander Blok: research and materials. Leningrad: [b. i.]: 64—77. (In Russ.).

120. Zaitseva, T. B., Rudakova, S. V. (2019). Where the lilac-siren lures (on the ambivalence of the image of Olga Ilyinskayain I. A. Goncharov’s novel Oblomov). Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 12 (12): 11—17. (In Russ.).

121. Zenkin, S. N. (1999). Theophile Gautier and “art for art’s sake”. In: Works on French literature. Yekaterinburg: Publishing House of the Ural University: 170—200. (In Russ.).

122. Zhirmunsky, V. M. (1964). Alexander Blok’s drama “The Rose and the Cross”. Literary sources. Leningrad: LSU Publishing House. 104 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Gorbovskaya S.G., Tyrkheeva N.S., Kondratyeva E.A. Plant Image in Literary Texts as an Object of Literary Analysis: A Review of Russian Scholarship (2000-2020s). Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(9):271-300. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-9-271-300

Views: 81


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)