Euphemization in English Political Discourse: A Functional- Communicative Approach
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-10-53-73
Abstract
This article addresses the contemporary issue of euphemization within English-language political discourse as a means to achieve authorial intentions and shape public opinion. The relevance is underscored by the increasing significance of politics in everyday life. The aim of this study is to analyze euphemisms in political discourse from a functional-communicative perspective. One key objective is to identify their predominant functions. The data for analysis are drawn from online versions of leading English-language newspapers (“Reuters”, “The Guardian”, “The Washington Post”, “The New York Times”) over the past five years. Special attention is given to defining euphemism, its relationship with concepts such as linguistic appropriateness, social roles, and political correctness. Comparative analyses of various approaches to defining and classifying euphemisms are presented. An original adaptation of a functional classification of euphemisms tailored to the specifics of English-language political discourse is proposed, encompassing image-building, tolerance-promoting, protective, and concealing euphemisms. It has been demonstrated that masking and protective euphemisms dominate, while the primary communicative strategies involve manipulating public opinion and legitimizing certain actions. The novelty of this research lies in identifying trends toward using emotionally charged terms instead of neutral euphemisms.
About the Authors
O. A. Zharina
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga A. Zharina, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Intercultural Communication and Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages
Rostov-on-Don
M. V. Samofalova
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina V. Samofalova, PhD in Philology, Department of Intercultural Communication and Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages
Rostov-on-Don
M. V. Bezzubikova
Astrakhan Tatishchev State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina V. Bezzubikova, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Russian
Astrakhan
References
1. Allan, K., Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 303 p. ISBN 978-0-521-52564-0.
2. Amaglobeli, G. (2024). Deception and euphemisms as a linguistic strategy in the context of (political) discourse. Journal of Social Sciences, 9: 13—18. DOI: 10.31578/jss.v9i1.151.
3. Battistella, E. (2005). Bad Language: Are Some Words Better Than Others? New York: Oxford University Press. 230 p.
4. Burridge, K. (2012). Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology, 7: 65—92. DOI: 10.4000/lexis.355.
5. Cao, Y. (2020). Analysis of pragmatic functions of English euphemism from the perspective of pragmatic principles. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10 (9): 1094—1100. DOI:10.17507/tpls.1009.12.
6. Crespo-Fernández, E. (2018). Euphemism as a discursive strategy in US local and state politics. Journal of Language and Politics, 17 (6): 789—811. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.17040.cre.
7. Druzhinin, A. S., Fomina, N. F., Polyakov, O. G. (2020). Euphemisms, dysphemisms, orthophemisms and experiential context: a holistic view on the linguistic problem. Language and Culture, 50: 23—40. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/50/3. (In Russ.).
8. Hussein, B. A.-S. (2021). John Rupert Firth’s Model of Linguistics: a Critical Study. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 5 (1): 66—71. DOI: 10.18488/journal.23/2016.5.1/23.1.66.71.
9. Jaganegara, H., Wijana, I. D. P. (2023). Euphemism roles as a disguise tool in political texts: a case study of Tempo online political articles. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 5 (1): 1—19. DOI: 10.15642/suluk.2023.5.1.1-19.
10. Jerca, A.-M. (2024). Avoiding Discomfort, Implying Consent: The Role of Euphemism in Establishing Evidence of Sexual Violence at the International Criminal Court. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law — Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 37 (2): 429—447. DOI: 10.1007/s11196-023-10028-9.
11. Karam, S. (2011). Truths and Euphemisms: How Euphemisms Are Used in the Political Arena. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 17 (1): 5—17.
12. Kateneva, I. G. (2013). Manipulative potential of euphemisms and dysphemisms in modern periodic editions. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 12 (6): 105—110. (In Russ.).
13. Keyes, R. (2010). Euphemania: Our Love Affair with Euphemisms. New York: Little, Brown and Company. 256 p. ISBN 978-0316056564.
14. Lazarevich, Ye. M. (2014). Usage of euphemisms with the function of political correctness in publicistic articles (on the English language material). Tomsk State University Journal, 378: 25—29. (In Russ.).
15. Mihas, E. (2005). Non-Literal Language in Political Discourse. In: LSO Working papers in Linguistics 5: Proceedings of WIGL 2005. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. 124—139.
16. Monashnenko, A., Amelina, S., Shynkaruk, V. (2021). The Phenomenon of Political Correctness in Modern English. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Trends in Languages, Literature and Social Communications (ICNTLLSC 2021), 557: 149—157. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.210525.019.
17. Perez, C. (2024). Euphemisms and Political Correctness. LiBRI. Linguistic and Literary Broad Research and Innovation, 13 (1): 81—89. DOI: 10.70594/libri/13.1/1/.
18. Rawson, H. (1995). Rawson’s dictionary of euphemisms and other doubletalk: Being a compilation of linguistic fig leaves and verbal flourishes for artful users of the English language. New York: Crown Publishers. 312 p. ISBN 978-0356091754.
19. Rubina, N. B. (2011). Euphemism and political correctness in contemporary English. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 4: 35—41. (In Russ.).
20. Selivanova, I. V. (2019). Euphemisms as a reflection of the social and economic problems of modern Spanish society (a case study of the Spanish press). Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 4: 156—162. (In Russ.).
21. Shemshurenko, O., Shafigullina, L. S. (2015). Politically Correct Euphemisms in Mass Media (Based on American and Turkish Online Periodicals of the Beginning of the 21 st Century). Journal of Sustainable Development, 8 (5): 128—138. DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v8n5p128.
22. Wang, Y. (2024). The Avoidance and Disguising Functions of English Euphemisms-Examples from American Political Language. Communications in Humanities Research Communications in Humanities Research, 24 (1): 100—106. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/24/20231531.
23. Zhao, X., Dong, J. (2010). Study on the Features of English Political Euphemism and its Social Functions. English Language Teaching, 3 (1): 34—41. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v3n1p118.
Review
For citations:
Zharina O.A., Samofalova M.V., Bezzubikova M.V. Euphemization in English Political Discourse: A Functional- Communicative Approach. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(10):53-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-10-53-73
Views:
3
Email this article 