Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Strategies for the Mediatization of Legal Concepts in Russian Mass Media of XXI Century (Concept LEGITIMACY)

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-3-69-85

Abstract

The role of mass media in the processes of interpretation and assessment of various fragments of reality is discussed in the article. The problem of the entry of legal concepts into the media discourse is raised and the task is set to study the changes occurring in this process, which ultimately lead to the formation of new conceptual units — media concepts. The designated task is solved in the process of analyzing one of the key legal concepts LEGITIMACY. It has been demonstrated that the Russian mass media significantly modify each of the three components of the legal concept, that is, the media virus is “implanted” into the conceptual, figurative and value layers. It allows us to speak of three strategies of mediatization: definitional, metaphorical and evaluative. It is shown that the definitional strategy contributes to the emergence of new features in the conceptual layer of the LEGITIMACY concept (‘trust’, ‘approval’, ‘support’, ‘respect’, ‘fairness’, ‘the phenomenon of consciousness’ and ‘subjective feeling’). It is noted that the metaphorical strategy additionally forms such linguo-culturally specific features as ‘defectiveness’ and ‘object of political manipulation’, the evaluative strategy gives the positively perceived concept of LEGITIMACY a negative connotation (conceptual signs of ‘doubtfulness’ and ‘imaginary’ develop), which is an alarming marker reflecting the current situation in Russian society. It is pointed out that the recorded changes indicate the importance of the discursive factor in the study of concepts.

About the Authors

O. N. Kondratyeva
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation

Olga N. Kondratyeva - Doctor of Philology, Professor.
Kemerovo.



Yu. S. Ignatova
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation

Yulia S. Ignatova - Master’s student.
Kemerovo.



References

1. Cap, P. (2005). Language and legitimization: Developments on the proximization model of political discourse analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 1: 7—36.

2. Doudaki, V. (2015). Legitimation Mechanisms in the Bailout Discourse. Javnost — The Public, 22 (1): 1—17. DOI:10.1080/13183222.2015.1017284.

3. Golubeva, T. M. (2016). Linguistic parameters of the strategy of legitimization of the European Union and delegitimization of B. al-Assad in the British political discourse. Bulletin of the Saratov University. New episode. Series: Philology. Journalism, 16 (4): 392—396. (In Russ.).

4. Klushina, N. I. (2014). Mediatization of modern culture and Russian national style. Russkaya rech, 1: 66—73. (In Russ.).

5. Kolmogorova, A. V. (2018). Legitimization as a sociopolitical phenomenon and object of discourse analysis. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 1 (67): 33—40. (In Russ.).

6. Kondratyeva, O. N. (2016). “Dictionary of political terms in the media” as a new lexicographic product. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, 6 (44): 38—49. DOI:10.17223/19986645/44/3. (In Russ.).

7. Korovin, V. M. Not only legality. Newspaper “Tomorrow”. Available at: https://zavtra.ru/blogs/ne_tol_ko_legal_nost (accessed 22.10.2020). (In Russ.).

8. Liguori, M., Steccolini, I. (2017). The power of language in legitimating publicsector reforms: When politicians “talk” accounting. The British Accounting Review. DOI :10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.006.

9. Orlova, O. V. (2014). Discursive-stylistic evolution of the media concept: the life cycle and the world-modeling potential. Doct. Diss. Tomsk. 425 p. (In Russ.).

10. Rashkoff, D. (2003). Mediavirus! How pop culture secretly affects your consciousness. Moscow: Ultra. Kultura. 368 p. ISBN 5-98042-012-6. (In Russ.).

11. Romashova, I. P. (2013). Legitimacy as a cognitive-pragmatic discursive category. In: Speech communication in modern Russia. Omsk: Omsk State University named after F. M. Dostoevsky. 390—401. (In Russ.).

12. Salanova, M. A. (2017). Mediatization of legal terms in the discourse of modern mass media. PhD Diss. Moscow. 260 p. (In Russ.).

13. Saveleva, I. V. (2019). Mechanisms of legitimization in the media discourse (based on the material of the Internet media). Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: History, Philology, 18 (6): 188—198. DOI:10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-6-188-198. (In Russ.).

14. Shmeleva, T. V. (2015). Mediatization as a phenomenon of modern culture and the object of research. Bulletin of the Novgorod State University. Yaroslav the Wise, 7 (90): 145-148. (In Russ.).

15. Valgina, N. S. (2003). Active processes in the modern Russian language: A textbook for university students. Moscow: Logos. 304 p. ISBN 5-94010-092-9. (In Russ.).

16. Vepreva, I. T. (2005). Linguistic reflection in the post-Soviet era. Moscow: Olma-Press. 384 p. ISBN 5-224-05307-2. (In Russ.).

17. Zakonchinsky, K. F. (2001). Legitimacy: genesis, formation and development of the concept. Polis, 2: 21—34. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Kondratyeva O.N., Ignatova Yu.S. Strategies for the Mediatization of Legal Concepts in Russian Mass Media of XXI Century (Concept LEGITIMACY). Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(3):69-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-3-69-85

Views: 620


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)