Experience in Modeling Associative Fields (Project “Multilingual Associative Thesaurus of Politeness”)
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-3-106-120
Abstract
The article is devoted to modeling associative fields vezhlivaya (f) and vezhlivyy (m) (polite) based on the materials of the project “Multilingual associative thesaurus of politeness”. The relevance of the study is due to the need to identify the structure and content of the associative-verbal network of a native speaker, which is possible when referring to the data of a free associative experiment. The author considers the combination of stimulus-response as a speech action. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that the analysis of associative data is carried out based on the operational model of speech production of distributive activation, which makes it possible to explain the presence of various reactions in the structure of the associative field. When analyzing each speech action and operation, the principle of approaching the word as a unity of the acoustic image and concept is considered. This indissoluble unity is manifested in the simultaneous mechanism of speech actions of conceptualization and internal articulation. A comparative analysis of the associations of the respondents in the masculine and female groups based on the operational model of speech production of distributive activation made it possible to identify universal and gender-specific features in the structure and content of the analyzed associative fields. It is concluded that it is possible to use the speech production model developed by the author in modeling associative fields.
Keywords
associative field,
politeness,
multilingual associative dictionary,
modeling,
speech action,
speech operation
Supporting agencies: The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 20-012-00160 А.
About the Author
N. I. Stepykin
Southwest State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Степыкин Николай Иванович - кандидат филологических наук, доцент.
Курск.
References
1. Akhutina, T. V. (2008). Model of speech generation by Leontiev-Ryabova: 1967—2005. In: Psychology, linguistics and interdisciplinary relations. Moscow: Smysl. 79—104. (In Russ.).
2. Kent, G. H., Rosanoff, A. J. (1910). Study of association in Insanity. Аmerican Journal of Insanity, 67: 317—390.
3. Kiss, G. R., Armstrong, C., Milroy, R., Piper, J. (1972). An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In: The computer and literary studies. Edinburgh: University Press. 153—165.
4. Leontiev, A. A. (1969). Language, speech, speech activity. Moscow: Education. 214 p. (In Russ.).
5. Leontiev, A. N. (1974). The general concept of activity. In: Fundamentals of the theory of speech activity. Moscow: Nauka. 368 p. (In Russ.).
6. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., Schreiber, T. A. The University of South Florida Word Association, Rhyme, and Word Fragment Norms. Available at: http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation.
7. Palermo, D. S., Jenkins, J. J. (1964). Word association norms: Grade school through college. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 448 p.
8. Playfoot, D., Balint, T., Pandya, V., Parkes, A., Peters, M., Richards, S. (2016). Are word association responses really the first words that come to mind? Applied Linguistics, 39 (5): 607—624. DOI:10.1093/applin/amw015.
9. Postman, L. J., Keppel, G. (1970). Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press, Language arts & Disciplines. 476 p.
10. Pyurbeev, G. Ts., Golubeva, E. V. (2019). Experience of creating an associative dictionary of comparisons. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 12 (2). Tambov: Gramota. 223—226. DOI:10.30853/filnauki.2019.2.48. (In Russ.).
11. Rahimi, Z., Shakery, A. (2011). Creating a Wikipedia-based Persian-English word association dictionary. In: 5th International Symposium on Telecommunications, IST 2010. 562—567. DOI: 10.1109/ISTEL.2010.5734088.
12. Sanchez, Puig M., Karaulov, Yu. N., Cherkasova, G. A. (2001). Associative norms of Russian and Spanish languages. Moscow; Madrid: Azbukovnik. 496 p. ISBN 5-99744-035-X. (In Russ.).
13. Stepykin, N. I. (2020). Associative field polite: dynamics of psychologically relevant content in the lexicon of an individual. Science for Education Today, 2: 151—166. DOI:10.15293/2658-6762.2002.10. (In Russ.).
14. Stepykin, N. I., Mironova, D. M. (2020). Project of a multilingual associative thesaurus of politeness. Kursk: Universitetskaya kniga. 205 p. ISBN 978-5-907356-47-4. (In Russ.).
15. Titova, L. N. (1975). Kirghiz-Russian associative dictionary. Frunze: Ilim. 250 p. (In Russ.).
16. Ufimtseva, N. V., Sternin, I. A., Eckert, X., Milekhina, V. I. (2004). Associative norms of Russian and German languages. Voronezh: Istoki. 130 p. ISBN 5-88242-338-4. (In Russ.).
17. Ulyanov, Y. E. (1988). Latvian-Russian associative dictionary. Riga: Zinatne. 186 p. (In Russ.).
18. Vasilyeva, S. P. (2020). Experience of Identifying the Specifics of Everyday Linguistic Consciousness of Russians according to Associative Dictionaries of the XX—XXI Centuries. Nauchnyi dialog, 1: 27—44. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-1-27-44. (In Russ.).
19. Wiesel, T. G. (2018). Articulation and its disorders (theoretical aspect from the perspective of neuropsychology). Special education, 3 (51): 123—135. DOI:10.26170/sp18-03-11. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Stepykin N.I. Experience in Modeling Associative Fields (Project “Multilingual Associative Thesaurus of Politeness”). Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(3):106-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-3-106-120
Views:
559
Email this article 