Tolstoy’s Text in Works of R. Akutagawa
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-3-218-230
Abstract
The supertext in the works of one of the most popular and mysterious Japanese writers of the early 20th century — Ryunosuke Akutagawa examined in the article. The relevance of this study is due to the fact that the problem of considering supertexts is one of the promising interdisciplinary areas of modern humanitarian knowledge. It is pointed out that in literary criticism there are quite a few works on topos texts, but very few works devoted to the nominal supertext, which is Tolstoy’s text. It is emphasized that Tolstoy’s text began to be created especially actively at the beginning of the twentieth century, and Tolstoy’s personality itself aroused interest not only in his homeland, but throughout the world. It is noted that the author’s extensive correspondence with public figures in Japan is known. It is argued that the fiction and journalistic texts of the Russian classic influenced the development of the national literature of Japan. Particular attention is paid to the issue of including in the text the personal myth of Leo Tolstoy as the basis of the Tolstoy’s text in the works of Akutagawa. It is shown that the Japanese writer refers to the story of the Yasnaya Polyana wise old man, using the episode of reconciliation between Turgenev and Tolstoy as the plot of the story “Woodcock”. In conclusion, the authors note that in their later works (“Cogwheels”, “The Life of an Idiot”) Akutagawa questions the sincerity of L. Tolstoy’s faith in God, interpreting the mythologeme “Leo Tolstoy and Religion” in an original way.
About the Authors
V. V. KuryanovaRussian Federation
Valeria V. Kuryanova - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor.
Simferopol.
N. A. Segal
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Segal - Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor.
Simferopol.
References
1. Andriukova, E. A. (2012). On the question of the supertext in modern literary studies: definition, typology, signs. Bulletin of the I. Ya. Yakovlev ChSPU, 1 (73); 2: 8—12. (In Russ.).
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Author and hero in aesthetic activity (fragment of the first chapter). In: Literary and critical articles. Moscow: «Fiction». 5—26. (In Russ.).
3. Bart, R. (1989). Myth today. In: Selected works: Semiotics: Poetics: Moscow: Progress. 72—131. ISBN 5-01-004408-0. (In Russ.).
4. Feldman, N. (1974). Notes. In: Akutagawa R. Novellas (Library of World Literature. Series three: Literature of the XX century). Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. 651—700. (In Russ.).
5. Kuryanova, V. V. (2019). Tolstoyan Text and Myth of L. N. Tolstoy in Works by I. Ilf and E. Petrov. Nauchnyi dialog, 1: 179—192. DOI:10.24224/2227-1295-2019-1-179-192. (In Russ.).
6. Loshakov, A. G. (2008). About the author’s paradigm of supertexts. Proceedings of the A. I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 71: 50—57. (In Russ.).
7. Rudnev, V. P. (1999). Dictionary of culture of the XX century. Moscow: Agraf. 384 p. ISBN 5-7784-0034-9. (In Russ.).
8. Toporov, V. N. (1995). Petersburg and «The Petersburg text of Russian literature» (Introduction to the topic). In: Myth. The ritual. The symbol. Image: Studies in the field of mythopoetic: Favorites. Moscow: Progress — Culture. 259—367. ISBN 5-01-003942-7. (In Russ.).
9. Toporov, V. N. (2009). Petersburg text. Moscow: Nauka. 820 p. (Monuments of Russian Science. XX century). ISBN 978-5-02-036015-0. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kuryanova V.V., Segal N.A. Tolstoy’s Text in Works of R. Akutagawa. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(3):218-230. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-3-218-230