Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Prishvin and Stalin: Artistic Image of the Leader in Writer’s Work

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-4-254-270

Abstract

The relevance of the study is due to the fact that the subject of the article is the question of who was the real prototype of the Chekist Sutulov in Prishvin’s novel “Tsar’s road”, which has not yet been considered in the history of foreign affairs. It is shown that in Russian literature it is difficult to find master of the pen, whose work would be to the same extent conditioned by the influence of the ideological and political context. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that for the first time an attempt was made to show how, through the artistic image of the Chekist Sutulov, one of the main characters of the novel “Tsar’s Road”, Prishvin seeks to reflect the ideo-logical and political attitudes, characteristic features of behavior, style of thinking and speech of Stalin. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the 18-volume “Diary” of the writer, which was not previously published due to censorship restrictions, which became available to the reader only in the post-Soviet period. It is shown that, through the artistic image of Sutulov, Prishvin gives his personal assessment of Stalin’s role in the development of the state, striving to artistically faithfully and truthfully reflect the characteristic features of that atmosphere of economic, political and spiritual super-tension in which Soviet society lived in the 1930s on the eve of the Great Patriotic War.

About the Authors

A. M. Podoksenov
Bunin Yelets State University
Russian Federation

Alexander M. Podoksenov - Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences.

Yelets



V. A. Telkova
Bunin Yelets State University
Russian Federation

Valentina A. Telkova - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of the Russian Language, Methods of its Teaching and Documentation.

Yelets



References

1. Dostoevsky, F. M. (1980). Complete works: in 30 volumes. Articles and Notes 1862—1865. Two camps of theoreticians (Concerning «The Day» and something else). Leningrad: Nauka. 20. 5—22. (In Russ.).

2. Kholodova, Z. Ya. (2000). Artistic thinking of M. M. Prishvin: Content, structure, context. Ivanovo: Ivanovo. 296 p. (In Russ.).

3. Kuznetsov, F. (1990). Rebellion and reconciliation of Prishvin. Nashe nasledie [Our legacy], 2: 83—84. (In Russ.).

4. Pavlovskiy, A. I. (1993). “... Signals to the people of the future” (About M. Prishvin’s diary of 1930). Russian Studies in Literature, 1: 81—91. (In Russ.).

5. Varlamov, A. N. (2003). Prishvin. Moskva: Molodaya gvardiya. 548 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Podoksenov A.M., Telkova V.A. Prishvin and Stalin: Artistic Image of the Leader in Writer’s Work. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(4):254-270. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-4-254-270

Views: 497


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)