Textual Bond ‘krome togo’ [moreover]: Contextual Modifications
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-6-78-91
Abstract
The service unit moreover is considered from the point of view of functioning in the text. The relevance of the study is due, on the one hand, to the inclusion of the research in the study of the linguistics of the text and linguistic units that serve as means of communication in the text, on the other hand, to the lack of special descriptions of text clips in research and lexicographic sources. The novelty of the research is seen in the fact that an attempt was made to describe the general regularities of the functioning of the bond moreover in the text, characteristic contexts were identified. The description of this word in scientific literature and lexicography is analyzed. In the course of the analysis, it was revealed that the unit also functions as a text bond with the value of attachment. A total of 5 contextual modifications have been established. Three modifications are related to the degree of significance of the information in the attached comment. Two more modifications relate to the text-forming function, which is performed by the bond moreover. To identify the features of the functioning of the studied bond, examples of its use in various journalistic and literary texts were analyzed.
About the Authors
N. V. KonevaRussian Federation
Natalia V. Koneva - Head of the Center for Testing Foreign Citizens, the Institute of Foreign Languages.
Vladivostok
E. A. Starodumova
Russian Federation
Elena A. Starodumova - Doctor of Philology, Professor, Department of Russian Language and Literature.
Vladivostok
References
1. Cheremisina, M. I., Kolosova, T. A. (1987). Essays on the theory of complex sentences. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 197 p. (In Russ.).
2. Lyapon, M. V. (1986). Semantic structure of a complex sentence and text: to the typology of intra-textual relations. Moscow: Nauka. 199 p. (In Russ.).
3. Otkidich, E. V. (2017). Functioning of text clips “by the wayˮ and “by the wayˮ in monologic and dialogical text. PhD Diss. Tomsk. 199 p. (In Russ.).
4. Perfilieva, N. P. (2006). Metatext in the aspect of text categories. Novosibirsk: NGPU. 285 p. (In Russ.).
5. Priyatkina, A. F. (2007). Text “clipsˮ and “clip-phrasesˮ (on the expansion of the category of service units of the Russian language). In: Russian syntax in the grammatical aspect (syntactic connections and constructions): selected works. Vladivostok: Far Eastern University. 334—344. (In Russ.).
6. Priyatkina, A. F., Starodumova, E. A. (2015). Text clips in the dictionary of service words. Siberian Journal of Philology, 2: 134—141. (In Russ.).
7. Shvedova, N. Yu. (ed.) (1980). Russian grammar, 2. Syntax. Moscow: Nauka. 710 p. (In Russ.).
8. Starodumova, E. A. (1981). On the relational properties of particles (syntactic properties of the “EXACTLYˮ particle). In: Syntactic communications in the Russian language. Vladivostok: Far Eastern State University. 111—123. (In Russ.).
9. Tyurin, P. M. (2016). Textual braces in this way and so in the modern Russian language: features of functioning and semantics. Vladivostok: Far Eastern University. 202 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Koneva N.V., Starodumova E.A. Textual Bond ‘krome togo’ [moreover]: Contextual Modifications. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(6):78-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-6-78-91