Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Fragmentation of Modern Artistic Narrative (English-Language Prose)

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-6-225-239

Abstract

 

The question of the role, forms and functions of fragmentation of modern artistic narra tive is considered. The results of the analy sis of the fragmentary narrative of the works of contemporary  English-speaking  authors (J.   Barnes,   D.   Mitchell,   M. Cunningham, I. Banks, J. Franzen, S. Faulks, J. Eugenides, A. Smith, J. McGregor and others) are presented. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that in the modern literature of the postmodernist direction, nonlinearity of narration, deliberate mixing of temporal, local, descriptive and other layers are becoming widespread, practically becoming the norm. The novelty of the research is seen in the fact that the fragmentation of a literary text is studied at different levels — compositional, content-thematic, plot, ideological-figurative, genre, narrative, chronotopic. It has been proved that the forms of implementation of fragmentariness are quite diverse: irregular division of the text, heterogeneity of themes and ideas, lack of linear development of the plot, combination of elements of different genres, the presence of internal polystylism, the use of different types of narration and narrator, violation of the unity of the chronotope. The analysis of specific material showed that the functions of a fragmentary narrative are determined by each specific context, the leading ones being the impact on the reader, the management of his attention, the placement of accents according to the writer's intention, the creation of the impression of authenticity and reliability.

About the Authors

G. I. Lushnikova
V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Galina I. Lushnikova - Doctor of Philology, Professor, Department of Foreign Philology and Teaching Methods.

Simferopol



T. Yu. Osadchaya
V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation

Tatiana Yu. Osadchaya - PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor Department of Foreign Philology and Teaching Methods.

Simferopol



References

1. Antonova, N. A. (2008). Polystylistics of the novel by A. S. Bayette “Possessionˮ: author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Voronezh. 24 p. (In Russ.).

2. Antsyferova, O. Yu. (2018). About the narrative of totalitarianism in the works of Julian Barnes. Bulletin of Perm University. Russian and foreign philology, 10/1: 69— 78. DOI: 10.17072/2037-6681-2018-1-69-78. (In Russ.).

3. Fokkema, D. W. (1984). Literary History, Modernism, and Postmodernism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 71 p.

4. Haynadi, Z. (2018). Fragmentary integrity. The novel “A Hero of Our Timeˮ M. Yu. Lermontov. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series. 8. Literary criticism, 1 (17): 5—14. (In Russ.).

5. Jameson, F. (2013). The Historical Novel Today, or, Is It Still Possible. In: The Antinomies of Realism. London: Verso. 259—314.

6. Katsman, R. (2017). Jerusalem: a dissipative novel by Denis Sobolev. New literary re view, 1 (143): 291—312. (In Russ.).

7. Kazanskaya, V. G. (2015). Reception of the historical past in the novel by Julian Barnes “Flaubert’s Parrotˮ. In: Ideas. Search. Solutions: a collection of articles of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference. Minsk. 101—105. (In Russ.).

8. Kelly, L. (1993). The Ocean, The Harbor, The City: Julian Barnes ’A History of the World in 10 ½ Chapters. Études Britanniques Contemporaines, 2: 1—10.

9. Lushnikova, G. I., Osadchaya, T. Yu. (2018). Modern English-language literature: traditions and experiment. Moscow: INFRA-M. 170 p. (In Russ.).

10. Lushnikova, G. I., Osadchaya, T. Yu. (2020). Contamination of genre forms in the novel by J. Franzen “Sinlessnessˮ. Philology and man, 3: 98—110. (In Russ.).

11. Mineralova, I. G. (2016). Analysis of a work of art: style and internal form: a tutorial. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka. 256 p. (In Russ.).

12. Murakami, H. (2020). Writer as a profession. Moscow: Eksmo. 320 p. (In Russ.).

13. Smirnova, N. N. (2021). About fragmentarity in literature. Studia Litterarum, 6/1: 32—51. (In Russ.).

14. Tarnarutskaya, E. V. (2012a). Editing and fragmentary prose: on the issue of differentiation of techniques. Bulletin of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 14/2: 230—234. (In Russ.).

15. Tarnarutskaya, E. V. (2012b). The problem of narrative in fragmentary prose (based on the literature of the twentieth century): author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Samara. 21 p. (In Russ.).

16. Tyupa, V. I. (2002). Essay on modern narratology. Criticism and semiotics, 5: 5—31. (In Russ.).

17. Zhilicheva, G. A. (2013). Narrative strategies in the genre structure of the novel (based on the material of Russian prose of the 1920—1950s). Novosibirsk: NGPU. 317 p. (In Russ.).

18. Zhosu, Z. K., Sharova, N. A. (2019). Features of the composition of J. Barnes’s novel “History of the world in 10 ½ chaptersˮ. In: Dialogue of languages and cultures in the modern educational space: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Voronezh. 124—128. (In Russ.).

19. Zverev, A. (1994). Afterword to the novel by J. Barnes “History of the world in 10 ½ chaptersˮ. Foreign literature, 1: 229—231. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Lushnikova G.I., Osadchaya T.Yu. Fragmentation of Modern Artistic Narrative (English-Language Prose). Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(6):225-239. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-6-225-239

Views: 848


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)