Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Between Innovation and Dogmatism: ‘Party Economic Functionaries’ as an Actors of Interaction between Regions and Center in Context of Transformation of Socio-Economic Sphere of USSR in 1970s — Early 1980s

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-6-378-391

Abstract

The ideas of heads of Soviet enterprises from different regions of the country concerning the socio-economic development of the USSR, expressed at a meeting in Moscow in 1983, are analyzed. The socio-psychological characteristics that were inherent in the Soviet economic leaders at the regional level, who were involved in discussing the problems of ‘improving the economic mechanism’, are studied in detail. The source base of the study includes documents from the Russian  State  Archive of Socio-Political History and the Center for Documentation of the Recent History of the Yaroslavl Region, oral history data (interviews with representatives of the regional authorities of the 1970s-1980s, which were personally conducted by the author of the article) and scientific literature. It is argued that the opinions of directors of the largest enterprises were perceived by party officials with the same level of trust as the opinions of representatives of the scientific community. It is concluded that the ideas of the party and economic activists intertwined the innovative nature of thinking with the dogmatic patterns of Soviet ideology. It is noted that the activities of the party and economic activists contributed to the formation of a kind of proto-bourgeoisie in the USSR in the 1970s-1980s. It is emphasized that the ideas of the party active on expanding the rights of enterprises and material incentives were a manifestation of latent capitalist tendencies. It is concluded that the main factor in the effective interaction of the regional ‘party economic functionaries’ with Moscow was close informal relations.

About the Author

Yu. S. Nikiforov
Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushinsky; Vologda State University
Russian Federation

Yury S. Nikiforov - ResearcherID L-7980-2016, PhD in History, Associate Professor.

Yaroslavl, Vologda



References

1. Beznin, M.  A., Dimoni, T.  M. (2019). A soviet proto-bourgeoisie: genesis of the upper class of russian society. Modern history of Russia, 9 (2): 437—453. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu24.2019.209. (In Russ.).

2. Beznin, M. A., Dimoni, T. M. (2020). Collective capitalist property in the institutional structure of Russia in the 1930s–1980s. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13 (4): 186—201. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.4.70.11. (In Russ.).

3. Beznin, M.  A., Dimoni, T.  M. (2020). “Over-production” management in the soviet economy (1930—1980). Voprosy istorii (Issues of History), 10—2: 42—60. DOI: 10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202010Statyi25. (In Russ.).

4. Derunov, P. F. (1998). Motorostroiteli. Rybinsk: Rybinsk House of Printing. 200 p. (In Russ.).

5. Eliseeva, N. V. (2021). Reform as a subject of historical analysis. Teaching of history and social science at school, 1: 3—16. DOI: 10.47639/2074-4935_2021_1_3. (In Russ.).

6. Hanson, Ph. (2003). The rise and fall of the Soviet economy. London: Longman. 279 p.

7. Kishchenkov, M. S., Nikiforov, Yu. S., Tumakov, D. V. (2018). «Everyone cringes before the big shot”, oh really?: Constants or innovations in structure and practices of the soviet regional elite of the 1950s—70s. Vestnik of Kostroma state university, 24 (4): 53—59. (In Russ.).

8. Kolennikova, O. A. (2010). Changes in the socio-economic attitudes of directors of industrial enterprises in the course of reforms. Social sciences and modernity, 6: 124—133. (In Russ.).

9. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union in resolutions and decisions from trips, conferences and plenums of the Central Committee. 1961—1965. (1986). Moscow: Politizdat. 11. 426—428. (In Russ.).

10. Leybovich, O. L. (2017). The hunt for the red director. Perm: Titul. 317 p. (In Russ.).

11. Nikiforov, Yu. S. (2018). The latest Russian history in the mirror of interviews with the regional elite: from the USSR to Russia through the prism of cultural memory. Yaroslavl: RIO YaGPU. 79 p. (In Russ.).

12. Nikiforov, Yu. S. (2020). “In the National Economy, Processes, to which we Cannot Close Our Eyes, are Aggravated”: Problems of USSR in the First Half of the 1980s (Materials of the N. I. Ryzhkov Foundation). Nauchnyi dialog, 9: 405—419. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-9-405-419. (In Russ.).

13. Tompson, P. (2003). Voice of the past. Moscow: Ves’ mir. 368 p. (In Russ.).

14. Yurchak, A. (2014). It was forever until it was over. The last Soviet generation. Moscow: NLO. 664 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Nikiforov Yu.S. Between Innovation and Dogmatism: ‘Party Economic Functionaries’ as an Actors of Interaction between Regions and Center in Context of Transformation of Socio-Economic Sphere of USSR in 1970s — Early 1980s. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(6):378-391. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-6-378-391

Views: 481


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)