Representation of Future Tense Semantics in Russian and German Linguocultures: Analysis of Grammatical Forms
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-11-9-27
Abstract
The linguocultural features of the representation of the grammatical future tense in the Russian and German languages are analyzed in the article. The results of a comparative analysis of grammatical forms with the semantics of the future tense are presented. The material for empirical research was the direct speech of works of art, from which examples with grammes of the future tense were extracted by the method of continuous sampling. Special attention is paid to the comparison of the grammatical forms of the future tense in Russian and German languages: in both languages there are two grammatical forms with a primary and two forms with a secondary meaning of futurality. It is noted that there is a similarity in semantics, structure and frequency between the future imperfect and future I, on the one hand, and the future perfect and futural present, on the other. The data of the historical development of grammatical forms are brought into consideration. The novelty of the research is seen in the assumption made in the work about the possible influence of the peculiarities of the cultural development of the speakers of the German and Russian languages on the discrepancies formed over time in the system of grammatical forms of futurality of these languages.
About the Authors
E. V. Bodnaruk
Northern (Arctic) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena V. Bodnaruk, Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor Head of the Department of German and French Philology
Arkhangelsk
V. V. Beim
Northern (Arctic) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktoriia V. Beim, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor Department of German and French Philology
Arkhangelsk
References
1. Abraham, W. (1989). Futur-Typologie in den germanischen Sprachen. In: Tempus — Aspekt — Modus. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 345—387. (In Germ.).
2. Abramov, B. A. (2001). Theoretical grammar of the German language. Comparative typology of German and Russian languages. Moscow: VLADOS. 288 p. (In Russ.).
3. Bodnaruk, E. V. (2016). The category of futurality in the German language: monograph. Arkhangelsk: SAFU. 152 p. ISBN 978-5-261-01167-5. (In Russ.).
4. Bodnaruk, E. V. (2018). Future tense and means of its explication in German. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 53: 32—47. (In Russ.).
5. Bondarko, A. V. (1971). The type and tense of the Russian verb (meaning and usage). Moscow: Prosveshchenie. 239 p. (In Russ.).
6. Duden. (2006). Die Grammatik. Mannheim; Wien; Zürich: Dudenverlag. 1343 S. ISBN 9783411040476. (In Germ.).
7. Durnovo, N. N. (2000). Selected works on the history of the Russian language. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. 780 p. ISBN 5-7859-0097-1. (In Russ.).
8. Eichler, W., Bünting, K.-D. (1996). Deutsche Grammatik. Form, Leistung und Gebrauch der Gegenwartssprache. Weinheim: Beltz Athenäum Verlag. 313 S. (In Germ.).
9. Glovinskaya, M. Ya. (2001). Polysemy and synonymy in the species-time system of the Russian verb. Moscow: “Azbukovnik”. 320 p. ISBN 5-93786-020-9. (In Russ.).
10. Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. Garden City; New York. 240 p.
11. Hall, Е. Т. (1976). Beyond Culture. Garden City; New York: Anchor Press. 298 p.
12. Heinold, S. (2015). Tempus, Modus und Aspekt im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr. 198 S. ISBN 978-3-8233-6867-0. (In Germ.).
13. Hoffmann, L. (2016). Deutsche Grammatik. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag. 647 S. ISBN 9783503170524. (In Germ.).
14. Ilyinskaya, E. A. (2017). The image and concept of time as factors of genesis and dynamics of cultural systems. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. St. Petersburg. 41 p. (In Russ.).
15. Knyazev, Yu. P. (2014). The impact of reference to the future on the opposition of species in the Russian language. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Proceedings of the Institute of Linguistic Research, 10 (2): 43—70. (In Russ.).
16. Kolesov, V. V. (2005). History of the Russian language. St. Petersburg: Faculty of Philology of St. Petersburg State University; Moscow: Academy. 672 p. ISBN 5-8465-0174-5. (In Russ.).
17. Kulikova, L. V. (2020). Communication. Style. Interculture: pragmalinguistic and cultural-anthropological approaches to intercultural communication. Moscow: INFRA-M; Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University. 268 p. ISBN 978-5-7638-2183-3. (In Russ.).
18. Latzel, S. (2004). Der Tempusgebrauch in deutschen Dramen und Hörspielen. München: IUDICIUM. 139 S. ISBN 3891297963. (In Germ.).
19. Leiss, E. (1985). Zur Entwicklung des neuhochdeutschen analytischen Futurs. Sprachwissenschaft, 10 (3/4): 250—273. (In Germ.).
20. Pospelov, N. S. (1955). Direct and relative use of the forms of the present and future tense of the verb in the modern Russian language. In: Research on the grammar of the Russian literary language: a collection of articles. Moscow: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 206—246. (In Russ.).
21. Rothstein, B. (2013). Doppeltes Futur im Deutschen? Ergebnisse aus einem Kurzfragebogen. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 4: 215—221. (In Germ.).
22. Schmidt, W. (2004). Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Stuttgart: S. Hirzel Verlag. 410 S. ISBN 3-7776-1277-4. (In Germ.).
23. Shtreker, N. Yu. (2005). Modern Russian: Historical commentary. Moscow: Academy. 240 p. ISBN 5-7695-1837-5. (In Russ.).
24. Sonderegger, S. (2003). Althochdeutsche Sprache und Literatur. Berlin, New York: W. de Gruyter. 390 S. ISBN 3-11-017288-7. (In Germ.).
25. Thieroff, R. (1992). Das finite Verb im Deutschen: Tempus — Modus — Distanz. Tübingen: Narr. 316 S. (In Germ.).
26. Ultan, R. (1978). The nature of future tenses. Universals of human languages, 3: 83–128.
27. Vinogradov, V. V. (2001). Russian language. Moscow: Russian Language. 720 p. ISBN 5-200-03017-X. (In Russ.).
28. Welke, K. (2005). Tempus im Deutschen: Rekonstruktion eines semantischen Systems. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. 522 S. ISBN 3-11-018394-3. (In Germ.).
29. Zhirmunsky, V. M. (2015). History of the German language. Moscow: URSS. 416 p. ISBN 978-5-9710-1655-7. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Bodnaruk E.V., Beim V.V. Representation of Future Tense Semantics in Russian and German Linguocultures: Analysis of Grammatical Forms. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(11):9-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-11-9-27
Views:
509
Email this article 