A Book of Poems in Internet Space: an Intermedial Aspect
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-4-187-202
Abstract
The work was carried out in line with the current idea of the Internet as a global media that interacts with various sign systems and influences the structural and compositional features of the verbal text. The relevance of the study is due to the formation of the concept of intermediality in the context of a new cultural direction, called “metavirtualism”. The aim of the article is to characterize the principles underlying the structure and composition of the network poetic “book”. Russian-language poetic cycles are considered, the structural and compositional features and expressive means of which are associated with Internet technologies. Such aspects as the type of intermediality and ways of organizing the structure and composition of the network “book” are analyzed; the reader’s way of getting acquainted with the work and the degree of freedom of this way; manifestation of the category of ephemerality. It is concluded that technological poetry, paradoxically, strengthens traditional book forms, but also has an independent value, visualizing poetic images and metaphors. Internet technologies can be “embedded” into the structure and composition of a poetry book at various levels: it can be relative autonomy; interaction at the level of a conceptual metaphor explicated with the help of Internet media (Google maps); almost complete fusion of media.
About the Authors
E. A. Abrosimova
Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Abrosimova - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages..
Omsk
Yu. D. Kravchenko
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia D. Kravchenko - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Journalism and media linguistics.
Omsk
References
1. Abrosimova, E. A. (2020). Modern Hypertext Poetry: Aspects of Relations between Author’s Text and Internet Resources. Nauchnyi dialog, (8): 9—28. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-8-9-28. (In Russ.).
2. Ananyina, O. A. (2016). New books about inter — and transmediality. Practices and Inter-pretations: Journal of Philological, Educational and Cultural Research, 1 (4): 285—296. (In Russ.).
3. Anisimova, E. E. (2003). Linguistics of text and intercultural communication (based on the material of creolized texts): a textbook for students. fac. foreign language Universities. Moscow: Academia. 128 p. ISBN 5-7695-0961-9. (In Russ.).
4. Aranha, S., Borborema, O. (2016). Interactivity in digital poetry: word, image and sound in movement. Texto livre: linguagem e tecnologia, 9 (2): 46—63. DOI: 10.17851/1983-3652.9.2.46-63.
5. Bartosh, Yu. V. (2018). New network poetry as a language game space. Bulletin of the People’s Friendship Russian State University. Series: Questions of education languages and specialty, 15 (1): 110—117. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8011-2018-15-1-110-117. (In Russ.).
6. Bernatskaya, A. A. (2000). On the problem of “creolization” of the text: history and current state. Speech communication: a specialized bulletin, 3 (11). Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk University. 104—110. (In Russ.).
7. Boeva, G. N., Sharafadina, K. I. (2021). Intermediate resource of new media texts as a theoretical and methodological problem. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Technology and Design. Series 3: Economic, Humanitarian and Social Sci-ences, 1: 105—115. DOI: 10.46418/2079-8210-2021-1-18. (In Russ.).
8. Bootz, P. (2021). The ephemerae of digital literature. Neohelicon, 48 (1): 7—22. DOI: 10.1007/s11059-021-00583-0.
9. Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2017). Text in the medial space: textbook. Moscow: LENARD. 232 p. ISBN 978-5-397-03865-2. (In Russ.).
10. Donskaya, E. V., Elkan, O. B. (2018). Metavirtualism is replacing postmodernism. Scientific notes of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philosophy. Political sci-ence. Cultural studies, 4 (70) / 4: 161—170. (In Russ.).
11. Gorina, E. V. (2016). Constitutive features of the Internet discourse. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Yekaterinburg. 55 p. (In Russ.).
12. Hansen-Levet, O. (2016). Intermediality in Russian culture. From Symbolism to the avant-garde. Moscow: RSUH. 450 p. ISBN 978-5-7281-1596-0. (In Russ.).
13. Hockx, M. (2015). Internet Literature in China. New York: Columbia University Press. 251 p. ISBN 9780231160827.
14. Kaida, L. G. (2016). The aesthetic imperative of an intermediate text. Linguophilosophical concept of compositional poetics. Moscow: Flint; Nauka. 128 p. ISBN 978-5-9765-2329-6. (In Russ.).
15. Kaida, L. G. (2019). Intermediality — philological continent. Voltaic arc of the author’s sub-text. Moscow: Flinta. 112 p. ISBN 978-5-9765-4067-5. (In Russ.).
16. Kalpidi, V. O. (2013). Encyclopedia. Ural Poetic school. Chelyabinsk: Ten thousand words. 608 p. (In Russ.).
17. Khaminova, A. A., Zilberman, N. N. (2014). Theory of intermediality in the context of modern humanities. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 389: 38—45. (In Russ.).
18. Kuzmina, N. A. (2013). The creative potential of the book form (a modern author’s book of poems). Linguistics of creativity-1: collective monograph. Yekaterinburg: Publish-ing House of the Ural State Pedagogical University. 346—368. (In Russ.).
19. Mitroshenkov, O. A. (2013). Post-Postmodernism as a premonition. Socio-humanitarian knowledge, 4: 52—61. (In Russ.).
20. Poymanova, O. V. (1997). Semantic space of the video verbal text. PhD Diss. Moscow. 237 p. (In Russ.).
21. Rakitina, E. B. (2008). “Poetic people” in the context of Russian-language Internet poetry. PhD Diss. Saratov. 147 p. (In Russ.).
22. Rosario, G. Di. (2011). Electronic Poetry. Understanding Poetry in the Digital Environment. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House. 336 p. ISBN 978-951-39-4324-0.
23. Schröter, J. Discourses and Models of Intermediality. Available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/ vol13/iss3/3 (accessed 16.12.2021).
24. Sedykh, E. V. (2008). To the problem of intermediality. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 9. Philology, 3 (II): 210—214. (In Russ.).
25. Smolskaya, E. P., Barteneva, A. S. (2021). Poetry and its reader in the digital age. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, 5 (1): 157—168. DOI: 10.24833/2541-8831-2021-1-17-157-168. (In Russ.).
26. Smyshlyaev, E. A. (2016). Intertextuality of modern Chelyabinsk poetry. Humanitarian Vec-tor. Series: Philology, Oriental Studies, 3: 18—24. (In Russ.).
27. Ulyanova, O. B., Ertner, D. E., Mavlyutova, A. A. (2019). Polycode mechanisms of interpre-tation of small poetic forms of network literature. Bulletin of the Tyumen State Uni-versity. Humanitarian studies. Humanitates, 5 (2): 88—106. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2019-5-2-88-106. (In Russ.).
28. Yavtseva, A. Digital opera “SHHD: Winter”: interview with Ilya Mazo, the creator of the project. Available at: http://journal.cbs-vao.ru/interview-with-ilyamazo (ac-cessed 15.12.2021). (In Russ.).
29. Valero, E. (2019). Introduction about poetry and poets in the digital era. Signa: revista de la asociacion espanola de semiotica, 28: 239—244. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.12.03.46.
30. Viires, P., Laak, M. (2021). Ephemerality in the digital world. Estonian case studies of digital literature and digital literary heritage projects, 48 (1): 39—52. DOI: 10.1007/s11059-021-00580-3.
31. Vorobyova (Vezhlian), E. (2020). Sincerity, affect, empathy: poetic communities and new contexts of publicity. Russian literature, 118: 45—77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ruslit.2020.11.003. (In Russ.).
32. Wolf, W. (2002). Intermediality revisited: reflections on word and music relations in the context of general typology of intermediality. Word and music studies, 4: 14—34.
33. Wolf, W. (1999). The Musicalization of Fiction: A Study in the Theory and History of Intermediality. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 272 p.
34. Xin, L. (2017). The evolution of media and new developments of Internet literature. In: Pro-ceedings of the 2017 2nd International conference on education, sports, arts and management engineering (ICESAME 2017). Series: Advances in Social Science Edu-cation and Humanities Research. 505—508. DOI: 10.2991/icesame-17.2017.109.
35. Zagidullina, M. V. (2017). Intermediality in the era of total mediatization: how technologies affect literature and its theory. In: Paverman Readings. Literature. Music. Theater: collection of scientific works. Yekaterinburg: Cabinet Scientist. 60—77. ISBN 978-5-7584-0267-2. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Abrosimova E.A., Kravchenko Yu.D. A Book of Poems in Internet Space: an Intermedial Aspect. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(4):187-202. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-4-187-202
Views:
401
Email this article 