Evolution of Office Work in State Institutions of Russian Empire in First Half of 19th Century (on Example of Department of Appanages)
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-4-451-469
Abstract
The article is devoted to the history of office work in the first half of the 19th century, using the example of the workflow of the Department of Appanages. On the basis of published materials and archival sources, the author examines the general principles of office work of state institutions of the Russian Empire, explores the evolution of document flow in the first half of the 19th century, evaluates the effectiveness of measures to reduce document flow, and identifies common and different features of the evolution of office work of the Department of Appanages. The office work reform in the Russian Empire had a complex character. Both the form of documents and the principles of circulation of documents have undergone changes. The effectiveness of the work of the governing bodies was assessed by the number of incoming and outgoing documentation. Despite the fact that the basic principles laid down by the office work reform were of a nationwide nature, they could acquire their own specific features in the state institutions themselves. In the Department of appanages, this was due to the gradual removal of the management of the appanage from the competence of other authorities of the Russian Empire. In the second quarter of the XIX century the exclusive right to manage all internal issues relating to the department was finally assigned to the specific authorities, which were directly subordinate to the emperor through the minister.
About the Author
Yu. N. KrasnikovaRussian Federation
Yulia N. Krasnikova - PhD in History, Associate Professor Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences and Humanities.
St. Petersburg
References
1. Blinov, I. (1905). Governors: a historical essay. St. Petersburg: Tipolit. K. L. Pentkovsky. 366 p. (In Russ.).
2. Emelyanova, V. S. (2012). Office work in Russia as an element of the public administration system: historical and legal analysis. Law and Security, 3—4 (43): 129—134. (In Russ.).
3. Eroshkin, N. P. (2008). History of state institutions of prerevolutionary Russia. Moscow: RGGU. 710 p. ISBN 978-5-7281-1026-2. (In Russ.).
4. Glotova, S. A. (2014). The emergence and development trends of administrative documentation in Russia in the pre-revolutionary period. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: documentation and archiving. Informatics. Information protection and information security, 2 (124): 70—77. (In Russ.).
5. Ilyina, K. A. (2011). Professors and bureaucratic communications in the Russian Empire in the first third of the 19th century. History and historical memory, 4: 133—158. (In Russ.).
6. Krasnikova, Yu. N. (2011). Religious policy of the Department of appanages in relation to the Molokan movement among appanage peasants in the first third of the 19th century. State, religion, Church in Russia and abroad, 29: 388—396. (In Russ.).
7. Krasnikova, Yu. N. (2012). The specifics of the interaction of specific and civil authorities on the ground (the first half of the 19th century). In: Regional management and the problem of the effectiveness of power in Russia (XVIII — early XXI century): collection of articles of the All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Partici-pation (Orenburg, October 30 — November 2, 2012). Orenburg. 141—145. ISBN 978-5-91854-097-8. (In Russ.).
8. Krasnikova, Yu. N. (2014). Specific peasants of the north-west of Russia at the end of the 18th — the first quarter of the 19th century: from the history of agrarian relations. St. Petersburg: SPbGAU. 164 p. ISBN 978-5-85983-253-8. (In Russ.).
9. Kudryavtseva, Z. I. (1967). Documents of higher and central institutions on the history of appanage peasants (1797—1863). In: Some questions of studying historical documents of the 19th — early 20th centuries. Leningrad. 176—204. (In Russ.).
10. Medvedeva, O. V., Avetisyan, A. A. (2020). Documentation of administrative activities: history and current state. Derzhavin Forum, 4/16: 116—122. (In Russ.).
11. Orlova, G. A. (1999). Bureaucratic writing as a mechanism of domination. Polis. Political studies, 5: 76—82. (In Russ.).
12. Pisarkova, L. F. (2002). On the history of bribes in Russia (based on the materials of the “secret office” of Prince Golitsyn). Domestic History, 5: 33—49. (In Russ.).
13. Pisarkova, L. F. (2007). Corruption in the public administration of Russia in the XVII—XIX centuries. Bulletin of the Russian Fund for Basic Research. Humanities and social sciences, 2 (87): 49—56. (In Russ.).
14. Raskin, D. I. (2005). Institute of Comrade Ministers in the System of Ministerial Administration of the Russian Empire. News of higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence, 2 (259): 132—144. (In Russ.).
15. Shepelev, L. E. (2007). Apparatus of power in Russia. The era of Alexander I and Nicholas I. St. Petersburg: Art-SPB. 461 p. ISBN 978-5-210-01519-8. (In Russ.).
16. Shushunova, E. V. (2012). Reform of ministerial office work in the first half of the 19th century. Legal science and practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2 (18): 55—59. (In Russ.).
17. Vinogradova, T. V. (2014). The state of provincial office work in the Russian Empire and attempts to reform it in the first half of the 19th century. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: documentation and archiving. Informatics. Information protection and information security, 2 (124): 59—69. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Krasnikova Yu.N. Evolution of Office Work in State Institutions of Russian Empire in First Half of 19th Century (on Example of Department of Appanages). Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(4):451-469. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-4-451-469