Buryat Language in Multi-Ethnic Buryatia: Functional Distribution, Language Competence, Motivations

The analysis of some of the results of a sociolinguistic survey conducted in 2020 in the Republic of Buryatia is presented in the article. A feature of this survey is a large sample (1289 respondents of Buryat and Russian nationality) and a wide coverage of the problems of the functioning of the Buryat language. A comparative analysis with the results of previous surveys showed that the level of proficiency in the native language of the Buryats and the degree of its use in various areas of communication continues to decline. A positive and tolerant attitude to the study of the Buryat language on the part of the Russian population was revealed, while at the same time a low assessment of its “necessity” by both Russians and Buryats. A causal relationship has been established between the compulsory teaching of the Buryat language in schools and an increase in the number of people who read and write in Buryat. It was revealed that when choosing a language of study, territorial motivation is the main one for Russians, for Buryats it is the motivation of ethnic identity. At the same time, the ethnoidentification factor has recently lost its significance, which is manifested in a high level of dual (ethno) linguistic identification and a decrease in the number of Buryats who consider the Buryat language to be their native language.

1. Alpatov, V. M. (2010). After twenty years. In: Language and society in present-day Russia and other countries: International conference (Moscow, June 21—24, 2010): Reports and communications. Moscow. 1—5. (In Russ.).

2. Avrorin, V. A. (1975). Problems of studying the functional side of the language: (On the subject of sociolinguistics). Leningrad: Nauka, Leningr. otd. 276 p. (In Russ.).

3. Badaraev, D. D. (ed.). (2020). The Buryat language in the regions of Russia, Mongolia and China: state, problems, factors of preservation and development: monograph. Ulan-Ude: Publishing House of Buryat State University. (In Russ.).

4. Baker, C. (1992). Attitudes and language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 173 p.

5. Budaeva, D. Ts. (2015). Assessment of the current language situation by the residents of Ulan-Ude. Bulletin of the Buryat State University, 14—1: 167—172. (In Russ.).

6. Dyrkheeva, G. A. (2020). The Buryat language in the context of bilingualism: features of the transformation of linguistic consciousness (according to the results of an associative experiment): monograph. Ulan-Ude: Publishing House of BNC SB of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 237 p. (In Russ.).

7. Dyrkheeva, G. A., Budaev, B. Zh., Bazheeva, T. P. (1999). Buryat language: modern state (social-linguistic aspect): monograph. Ulan-Ude: BNC SB of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 143 p. (In Russ.).

8. Ivanov, V. V. (2021). Buryat language in the language landscape and language practices in the city of Ulan-Ude. Sociolinguistics, 1 (5): 147—163. DOI: 10.37892/2713-2951-2021-1-5-147-163. (In Russ.).

9. Ivanova, N. I. (2021). The language situation in the Republic (Sakha) of Yakutia: the Yakut language in the context of linguistic heterogeneity (ethnosociopsycholinguistic aspect): Doct. Diss. Yakutsk. 375 p. (In Russ.).

10. Khilkhanov, D. L., Khilkhanova, E. V. (2021). The phenomenon of cultural distance in modern conditions (Linguistic and religious factors). MCU Journal of philosophical sciences, 3 (39): 55—65. DOI: 10.25688/2078-9238.2021.39.3.06. (In Russ.).

11. Khilkhanova, E. V., Dyrkheeva, G. A., Lyubimova, L. M., Sundueva, D. B. (2016). Linguistic Consciousness and Linguistic Attitudes of the Residents of the Border Regions of the East of Russia (on the example of the Republic of Buryatia and the Trans-Baikal Territory). Moscow: Nauka-Vostochnaya literatura. 174 p. (In Russ.).

12. Krist, S. (ed.). (2022). Father Baikal and his Cosmopolitans: Buryats in Europe. Wien: Prasens Verlag. 218 p. ISBN 978-3-7069-0599-2.

13. Mikhalchenko, V. Yu. (ed.). (2006). Dictionary of sociolinguistic terms. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics RAS. 312 p. (In Russ.).

14. Ó hIfearnáin, T. (2018). The Ideological Construction of Boundaries Between Speakers, and Their Varieties. In: C. Smith-Christmas, M. Hornsby, M. Moriarty, N. Ó Murchadha (eds.). New Speakers of Minority Languages: Linguistic Ideologies and Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan. 151—164.

15. Pilchinova, M. M. (2015). Frame analysis as a way of presenting the individual’s vision of the language situation: on the example of the Republic of Buryatia. In: Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Proceedings of the Institute for Linguistic Research. 11 (3): 329—335. (In Russ.).

16. Stefanenko, T. G. (1999). Ethnopsychology. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS, Akademicheskiy proekt. 320 p. (In Russ.).

17. Stepanova, A. A. (2016). Ethnical identity and language consciousness of Buryats: sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic studies. Journal of psycholinguistics, 30: 206—215. (In Russ.).

18. Sundueva, D. B. (2005). Buryat-Russian bilingualism in the Aginsky Buryat Autonomous Okrug: sociolinguistic aspect: monograph. Chita: Chita State University. 182 p. (In Russ.).

19. Tregubova, D. D. (2016). Buryat language in the global language system. Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanitarian Research RAS, 9; 4 (26): 75—82. (In Russ.).

20. Vakhtin, N. B. (2001). Languages of the peoples of the North in the 20th century. Language shift essays. St. Petersburg: Dmitriy Bulanin. 338 p. (In Russ.).