Cursive Copies of Siberian Documents from 17th Century: A Paleographic Description
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-2-72-93
Abstract
This article is dedicated to the paleographic description of Siberian documents from the 17th century that exist only in copies transcribed from original texts during the Second Kamchatka Expedition (1733–1743). It clarifies that the textual copies were created according to the graphic conventions of Russian cursive writing from the 18th century. The study highlights that function words are written as a single unit, while spaces are maintained between other linguistic units. It is reported that the letter-based dating method has been replaced by a numerical one. The analysis reveals that the handwriting features of both scribes bear resemblance to the characteristics of Kyiv cursive, which further developed in 18thcentury Russia. It is established that the use of extended letters in both copies has been significantly reduced. The findings demonstrate a diverse array of non-alphabetic diacritical marks actively employed, typically positioned above consonants that were subject to extension in business correspondence of the 16th and 17th centuries. It is proven that the scribes accurately convey variant spellings reflecting the phonetic nuances of 17th-century writers, reproducing their errors. However, it is emphasized that certain word forms recorded raise doubts about their accurate reproduction, reminding us that any manuscript copy is not free from mistakes.
About the Authors
A. P. Mayorov
V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander P. Mayorov, Doctor of Philology, Professor
Moscow
Yu. V. Biktimirova
Transbaikal State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia V. Biktimirova, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Russian as a Foreign Language, Department of Russian Language and Teaching Methodology
Chita
References
1. Andreev, A. I. (1965). Essays on the source studies of Siberia, 2. Moscow; Leningrad: Nauka Publ. 366 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bakhrushin, S. V. (1999). Miller as a historian of Siberia. In: G. F. Miller. History of Siberia, 1. Moscow: “Oriental literature”. RAS. 17—65. (In Russ.).
3. Biktimirova, Yu. V. (2015). Features of paleography and graphics of business writing monuments of Eastern Transbaikalia of the XVII—XVIII centuries. Scientific notes of ZabGU. Series: Philology, History, Oriental Studies, 2 (61): 17—65. (In Russ.).
4. Biktimirova, Yu. V., Mayorov, A. P. (2024). Trans-Baikal documents of the XVII century as a linguistic source: graphic and spelling features. Bulletin of the Belarusian State University. Philology, 3: 14—24. DOI: 10.18101/2686-7095-2024-3-14-24. (In Russ.).
5. Elert, A. H. (2012). Journey through the northeast of Siberia as a turning point in the expeditionary activity of G. F. Miller. Humanities in Siberia, 4: 44—47. (In Russ.).
6. Golyshenko, V. S. (2002). Superscription marks in early East Slavic manuscripts. In: Linguistic source studies and the history of the Russian language 2001. Moscow: Drevlekhranizhche Publ. 47—70. ISBN 5-93646-014-2. (In Russ.).
7. Hristosenko, G. A. (1973). Paleographic album: A textbook collection of photographs from the manuscripts of Nerchinsk business letter documents of the late 17th — first half of the 18th centuries. Chita: [b. i.]. 112 p. (In Russ.).
8. Ivanov, A. V. (2023). The many-faced hyphen. Language and culture, 62: 26—53. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/62/2. (In Russ.).
9. Kornilaeva, I. A. (2003). Superscription marks in handwritten News-Chimes. In: Linguistic source studies and the history of the Russian language 2002—2003. Moscow: Drevlekhranizhche Publ. 389—398. (In Russ.).
10. Kotkov, S. I. (1980). Linguistic source studies and the history of the Russian language. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 296 p. (In Russ.).
11. Mayorov, A. P. (2021). The historical and differential principle of the 17th century regional dictionary. Bulletin of the Belarusian State University. Philology, 3: 29—37. DOI: 10.18101/2686-7095-2021-3-29-37. (In Russ.).
12. Nechaeva, S. V. (2003). G. F. Miller’s contribution to the study of Asian Russia: source studies and historiographical aspects. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk University. Series 10: Oriental Studies. Eurasianism. Geopolitics, 1: 130—139. (In Russ.).
13. Ogloblin, N. N. (1889). On the question of the historiographer G. F. Miller. Bibliographer, 8—9: 161—166. (In Russ.).
14. Rosen, T. (2015). The withering away of superscripts (based on the material of diplomatic correspondence of the XVIII century). In: Books that have an unknown depth. Uppsala: Uppsala University. 184—197. (In Russ.).
15. Smorgunova, E. M. (1966). On boundary signals in cursive (observations on graphics of the Smolensk letters of the XVII century). In: Research of sources on the history of the Russian language and writing. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 176—190. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Mayorov A.P., Biktimirova Yu.V. Cursive Copies of Siberian Documents from 17th Century: A Paleographic Description. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(2):72-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-2-72-93
Views:
343
Email this article 