Schiller versus Bürger: An Eighteenth-Century Debate on Nature of Popular Art

This article examines a pivotal aesthetic debate in late eighteenth-century German literature between Friedrich Schiller (1759–1805) and Gottfried August Bürger (1747–1794) concerning the nature of “popular” art (Volkskunst). The analysis focuses on the core texts of this polemic: Schiller’s critical review, “On Bürger’s Poems,” and Bürger’s retaliatory piece, “Preliminary Anti-Critique.” The study aims to delineate the contrasting literary-aesthetic paradigms of Schiller, who advocated an idealizing, classicist art, and Bürger, who championed a democratic, realist art. The investigation establishes that Bürger argued for a realist principle of “popularity” (Volkstümlichkeit), grounded in the study of folklore and the truthful representation of reality, positing that the poet must be immersed “among the people.” In contrast, Schiller defended an idealist approach, which required the poet to create a sublime ideal and to “descend” to the people in order to ennoble them. It is demonstrated that Bürger’s concept affirmed the work’s fidelity to life, whereas Schiller’s position led to elitism and schematicism. The author concludes that this controversy was inevitable, as it reflected a fundamental divergence between the classicist and preRomantic paradigms. The study further argues that Schiller’s rebuttal of Bürger’s stance served to embed the tenets of a new classicism into artistic theory. The novelty of this research lies in its detailed comparative analysis of the arguments put forth by both sides, which reveals the ontological foundations of their aesthetic disagreement. 

1. Alves, A., Neuhaus, T. (2023). «The way to the head must be opened through the heart». Enlightenment and Herzensbildung in Schiller. Studia Theodisca, 30: 5—27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54103/1593-2478/21670.

2. Bernstein, I. A., Miropolskaya, E. E. (2010). Friedrich Schiller. Foreign languages at school, 8: 106—115. (In Russ.).

3. Fedotova, L. V. (2010). Romanticism: sociocultural foundations of dialogue with folk culture. SEARCH: Politics. Social studies. Art. Sociology. Culture, 5 (29): 38—47. (In Russ.).

4. Gaskill, H. (2003). Ossian, Herder, and the Idea of Folk Song. In: Literature of the Sturm und Drang. Rochester, N.Y: Boydell & Brewer, Camden House. 95—116.

5. Gusev, D. O. (2019). Friedrich Schiller on the nature of art and beauty. Scientific works, 51: 93—105. (In Russ.).

6. Herlinghaus, H. (2002). Art. Populär. In: Ästhetische Grundbegriffe, 4. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. 832—884. (In Germ.).

7. Konkina, A. M. (2022). Jorg Robert on classical romanticism and aesthetics of depth in Schiller (“The Cup”). Social Sciences and Humanities. Russian and foreign literature. Series 7, Literary Criticism, 4: 173—179. DOI: 10.31249/lit/2022.04.12. (In Russ.).

8. Lanstein, P. (1984). The Life of Schiller. Moscow: Raduga Publ. 404 p. (In Russ.).

9. Little, W. A. (1974). Gottfried August Bürger. New York: Twayne. 234 S. (In Germ.).

10. Lukov, V. A. (2006). Pre-romanticism. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 683 p. ISBN 5-02-034354-4. (In Russ.).

11. Mikhailov, A. V. (2010). Shiller. In: New Philosophical Encyclopedia: in 4 volumes. Moscow: Mysl. 2816 p. ISBN 978-2-244-01115-9. (In Russ.).

12. Paulus, J. (2013). Johann Gottfried August Bürger: Von der Popularität der Poesie. Zur Poetik des Volkslieds im Sturm und Drang. Sturm und Drang. Epoche — Autoren — Werke. — Darmstadt. 122—138. (In Germ.).

13. Penke, N. (2024). Formationen des Populären. Semantik und Poetik des “Volkes“ um 1800. Heidelberg: Felix Meiner Verlag. 507 S. (In Germ.).

14. Weinmann, F. (2011). Das Populäre bei Gottfried August Bürger. In: Das Populäre. Untersuchungen zu Interationen und Differenzierungsstrategien in Literatur, Kultur und Sprache. Göttingen: Dieterich. 65—78. (In Germ.).

15. Zakharov, N. V. (2023). Poetics of Shakespeareanization in German drama of the XVIII— XIX centuries. Scientific Works of the Moscow University for the Humanities, 2: 12—22. DOI: 10.17805/trudy.2023.2.2. (In Russ.).

16. Ziolkowski, T. (2009). Heidelberger Romantik: Mythos und Symbol. Heidelberg: Winter. VIII, 2414 S. (In Germ.).