Expression of Meaning ‘Change’: A Discourse Dominant in German Psychological Journalism?

P. I. Kondratenko

doi:10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-1-50-67

Expression of Meaning ‘Change’: A Discourse Dominant in German Psychological Journalism?

P. I. Kondratenko

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-1-50-67

Full Text:

PDF (Rus)

Generate QR code

Abstract

This article focuses on the discourse of German psychological journalism by reviewing works that conceptualize psychotherapeutic, scientific-psychological, and popular-psychological communication. It is hypothesized that nouns verbalizing change are characteristic of German-language psychological publications. These include terms denoting changes themselves as well as obstacles to change such as Veränderung, Entwicklung, Wandel, Transformation, Trauma, Krise, etc. To verify this hypothesis, a quantitative-discursive analysis was conducted using materials from the journal Psychologie Heute published between 2013 and 2025. Methods of computational linguistics were employed, specifically utilizing the corpus manager AntConc. From the total of 4,348,563 word tokens within the research corpus, all contexts including lexemes signifying change were extracted. The study demonstrated that these nouns do not rank among the most frequent words in the analyzed corpus. However, it also revealed significant discrepancies between their usage patterns in the studied corpus compared to a reference corpus. Special attention is given to context-semantic analyses of collocations with these selected lexical items. It is concluded that collocational patterns contribute to terminological precision and serve discussions related to current social issues in the field of German popular psychology.

Keywords

popular psychology discourse, discursive dominant, German psychological journalism, Psychologie Heute, corpus-based methods, AntConc

About the Author

P. I. Kondratenko

St. Petersburg State University
Россия

Polina I. Kondratenko, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of German Philology

Saint Petersburg

References

1. Akhmerova, L. R. (2015). Psychological discourse and its varieties in modern Russian. In: I. A. Baudouin de Courtenay and world linguistics. International Conference (V Baudouin Readings): proceedings and materials, 2. Kazan: Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University. 21—23. ISBN 978-5-00019-485-0. (In Russ.).

2. Antoni, C. H. (2024). Berufsfelder von Psychologinnen und Psychologen. Psychologische Rundschau, 75 (2): 119—133. DOI: 10.1026/0033-3042/a000668. (In Germ.).

3. Asmolov, A. G., Bityutskaya, E. V., Bratus, B. S., Leontiev, D. A. (2023). Dialogues about / in the field of meanings: on the 120th anniversary of the birth of Alexei Nikolaevich Leontiev. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Episode 14. Psychology, 46 (2): 5—22. DOI: 10.11621/LPJ-23-13. (In Russ.).

4. Belyaeva, L. N. (2021). Corpus technologies in research and training: a methodology for analyzing nominal groups in a scientific text. Society. Communication. Education, 12 (4): 46—59. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.12404. (In Russ.).

5. Bubenhofer, N. (2011). Korpuslinguistik in der linguistischen Lehre: Erfolge und Misserfolge. JLCL, 26 (1): 141—156. (In Germ.).

6. Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2018). Discursive analysis and corpus methods: a necessary evidentiary link? Explanatory possibilities of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Questions of cognitive linguistics, 2: 31—37. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2018-2-31-37. (In Russ.).

7. Deeva, N. A. (2022). Subjective ideas of Russians about life success. National Psychological Journal, 2 (46): 14—24. DOI: 10.11621/npj.2022.0202. (In Russ.).

8. Gabrielatos, C. (2011). Keyness: Matching metrics to definitions. Corpus Linguistics in the South 1, University of Portsmouth, 5 November. Available at: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/51449 (accessed 01.08.2025).

9. Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness analysis: nature, metrics and techniques. In: Corpus Approaches to Discourse. A Critical Review. London, New York: Routledge. 225—258. ISBN 978-1-138-89578-2.

10. Gilyasev, Yu. V. (2015). The language of popular psychology: the experience of linguistic analysis. In: Philological studies. Saint Petersburg: Pushkin Leningrad State University. 21—36. ISBN 978-5-8290-1544-2. (In Russ.).

11. Gilyasev, Yu. V. (2017). Pragmatics of English-language motivational discourse. Scientific Notes of Petrozavodsk State University, 5 (166): 70—76. (In Russ.).

12. Goodman, S. (2017). How to conduct a psychological discourse analysis. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 9 (2): 142—153.

13. Helfrich, H. (2018). Kulturvergeleichende Psychologie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 231 S. (In Germ.).

14. Issers, O. S. (2012). People say... Discursive practices of our time. Omsk: Publishing House of Omsk State University. 276 p. ISBN 978-5-7779-1520-7. (In Russ.).

15. Istomina, E. M. (2024). National and cultural specifics of the Russian-language discourse of popular psychology. The world of science, culture, and education, 6 (109): 572—574. (In Russ.).

16. Karpunkova, V. V. (2023). The idea of F. Fukuyama’s “therapeutic turn” in the context of understanding the transformation of modern society. Humanitarian studies in Eastern Siberia and the Far East, 1 (63): 36—45. DOI: 10.24866/1997-2857/2023-1/36-45. (In Russ.).

17. Khokhlova, M. V. (2024). Thematic content of university life through the prism of meaningful vocabulary. In: Media linguistics. Language in the coordinates of the mass media: proceedings of the VIII International Scientific Conference, 11. Saint Petersburg: Mediapair. 744—747. ISBN 978-5-00110-446-9. (In Russ.).

18. Kilgarriff, A. (2012). Getting to know your corpus. In: Proc. Text, Speech, Dialogue (TSD 2012), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 3—15. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-32790-2_1.

19. Kochetova, L. A., Popov, V. V. (2019). Research of Axiological Dominants in Press Release Genre based on Automatic Extraction of Key Words from Corpus. Nauchnyi dialog, 6: 32—49. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2019-6-32-49. (In Russ.).

20. Koryshev, M. V., Khokhlova, M. V., Kulikova, L. A. (2024). Identification of significant topics using the LDA algorithm based on the material of German media discourse. German Philology at St. Petersburg State University, 14: 418—433. DOI: 10.21638/spbu33.2024.122. (In Russ.).

21. Kovtunova, E. A., Yezan, I. E. (2024). Emotivity of popular science media discourse (based on German online articles and podcasts about artificial intelligence). Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Language and literature, 21 (4): 842—865. DOI: 10.21638/spbu09.2024.405. (In Russ.).

22. Madsen, O. J. (2014). The Therapeutic Turn: How Psychology Altered Western Culture. London: Routledge. 204 p.

23. Matveicheva, T. V. (2024). Translatological features of the medical vocabulary of the subject area “Psychotherapy”. In: Isomorphic and allomorphic features of language systems. Collection of scientific articles. Stavropol: North Caucasus Federal University. 105—109. ISBN 978-5-9296-1292-3. (In Russ.).

24. Pavlova, N. D., Zachesova, I. A. (2011). Discourse in the modern world. Psychological research. Moscow: Publishing House “Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences”. 368 p. ISBN 978-5-9270-0216-0. (In Russ.).

25. Semenova, M. G. (2024). Forms of expert commentary in the media on psychology (using the example of coverage of the coronavirus pandemic in the journal of Psychologies). Modern Humanities Success, 12: 132—138. DOI: 10.58224/2618-7175-2024-12-132-138. (In Russ.).

26. Shelestyuk, E. V. (2008). Features of texts of popular psychology. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 12: 168—176. (In Russ.).

27. Shevyakina, S. V. (2020). Linguistic and stylistic parameters of the Internet discourse of psychology of healthy lifestyle. Humanitarian Scientific Bulletin, 3: 191—196. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3770803. (In Russ.).

28. Spitzmüller, J., Pfadenhauer, M. (2024). Der ‚digital-öffentliche Raum‘ als kommunikative Figuration und vergemeinschaftungsideologische Imagination. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 52 (1): 14—33. DOI: 10.1515/zgl-2024-2002. (In Germ.).

29. Sydow, K., Weber, A., Reimer, Ch. (1998). Psychotherapists, psychologists and psychiatrists in the media: a content analysis of the cover pictures of eight german magazines, published 1947—1995. Psychotherapeut, 43 (2): 80—91.

Review

For citations:

Kondratenko P.I. Expression of Meaning ‘Change’: A Discourse Dominant in German Psychological Journalism? Nauchnyi dialog. 2026;15(1):50-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-1-50-67

JATS XML