Language Markers of Idea Literature in Philosophical Reflexive Paradigm: A Case Study of Michel de Montaigne's “Essais”

V. A. Rayskina

doi:10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-1-88-107

Language Markers of Idea Literature in Philosophical Reflexive Paradigm: A Case Study of Michel de Montaigne's “Essais”

V. A. Rayskina

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-1-88-107

Full Text:

PDF (Rus)

Generate QR code

Abstract

This study investigates language markers of idea literature within a philosophical reflexive paradigm using the material from Michel de Montaigne’s “Essais”. The relevance of this research lies in formalizing criteria for identifying texts belonging to “idea literature” by examining linguistic means that reflect their reflective nature and thesis-driven argumentative structure. Employing a linguoaxiological approach, content analysis was conducted to identify verbalizations of ontological concepts, arguments, and persuasive techniques. Data were extracted from the online corpus MonLOE, which provides access to digital manuscripts of the 1588 edition of “Essais”, enabling automated search and analysis of linguistic units. The term essema, defined as an evaluative construction expressing subjective axiological truths, is introduced. It is demonstrated how key essemas function to subjectivize meanings of core ontological concepts such as DEATH (mort), MAN (homme), REASON (raison), NATURE (nature), KNOWLEDGE (savoir), WORLD (monde), CUSTOM (usage), VIRTUE (vertu), TRUTH (vérité). Through detailed examination of textual modality features characteristic of essays as a reflexive genre — such as aphoristic expression, exemplification, intertextuality, and appeals to authority— the study highlights effective rhetorical strategies employed in Montaigne’s work. The novelty of this investigation resides in uncovering and systematizing linguistic mechanisms underlying conceptualization processes in philosophical essays across diachronic dimensions.

Keywords

Idea literature, reflexive discourse, essema, thesis, argumentation, ontological concept, Montaign

About the Author

V. A. Rayskina

Moscow City University
Россия

Valeria A. Rayskina, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Romance Languages and Linguodidactics

Moscow

References

1. Avramenko, V. I. (2021). Novel at the junction of philosophy and literature. Bulletin of the Minsk State Linguistic University. Series 1: Philology, 3 (112): 118—124. (In Russ.).

2. Baranov, A. N. (2023). Linguistic examination of the text: theory and practice. Moscow: Flint: Nauka. 592 p. ISBN 978-5-9765-0083-9. (In Russ.).

3. Costentin, C., Amossy, R. (2003). L’argumentation dans le discours. Discours politique, littérature d’idées, fiction. L’Information Grammaticale, 98: P. 60. (In French).

4. Dortier, J.-F. (2018). Michel de Montaigne: Le savoir sceptique. In: De Socrate à Foucault. Les philosophes au banc d’essai. Paris: Éditions Sciences Humaines. 61—68. (In French).

5. Dubois, F.-R. (2016). Sous les classiques, la page: le XVIIe siècle dans De cape et de crocs. Littératures classiques, 91: 141—150. DOI: 10.3917/licla1.091.0141. (In French).

6. Efimova, L. N., Alexandrova, E. V., Samokhina, E. A. (2018). Poetics of science fiction and fantasy genres in C. S. Lewis’s novel “The Space Trilogy”. In: Science in the modern Information Society, 2. North Charleston: CreateSpace. 82—88. (In Russ.).

7. Efimova, L. N., Shekhireva, N. A. (2017). Genre features of C. S. Lewis’s novel “The Space Trilogy”. Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 4 (94): 184—188. (In Russ.).

8. Epstein, M. N. (1988). At the crossroads of images and concepts: essayism in Modern Literature. In: Paradoxes of Novelty. Moscow: Soviet Writer. 210 p. ISBN 5-265-00166-2. (In Russ.).

9. Fanyan, N. Y. (2016). Ethics of discourse (argumentative aspect). Society: philosophy, history, culture, 8: 9—11. (In Russ.).

10. Genette, G. (1972). Figures III. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. 428 р. ISBN 9782020020398. (In French).

11. Genette, G. (1979). Introduction à l’architexte. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. 89 р. ISBN 2020053101. (In French).

12. Genette, J. (1998). Shapes. In 2 volumes, 1. Moscow: Publishing House named after Sabashnikov. 472 p. ISBN 5-8242-0064-5. (In Russ.).

13. Gilks, M. (2003). Science Fiction: The Literature of Ideas. Available at: https://www.writing-world.com/sf/sf.shtml/ (accessed 16.07.2025).

14. Gray, F., Thibaudet, A. (1994). Réflexions Inédites d’Albert Thibaudet Sur La Formation d’une Littérature d’idées En France. Revue d’Histoire Littéraire de La France, 94 (2): 179—197. (In French).

15. Ivanov, O. B. (2017). Poetical and functional features of the essayistic text. Rostov-on-Don: AkademLit. 98 p. ISBN 978-8-904067-20-7. (In Russ.).

16. Ivin, A. A. (ed.). (2004). Philosophy: An encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow: Gardariki. 1072 p. ISBN 5-8297-0050-6. (In Russ.).

17. Kamnev, V. M. (2002). Russian conversation and the idea of man in the works of F. M. Dostoevsky. In: Ya. (A. Slinin) and We: on the 70th anniversary of Professor Ya. A. Slinin. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Philosophical Society. 197—227. (In Russ.).

18. Kozhevnikov, N. N., Danilova, V. S. (2017). A philosophical view of science fiction and fantasy genres. Bulletin of the Northeastern Federal University named after M. K. Ammosov. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Philosophy, 4 (08): 129—137. (In Russ.).

19. Leavitt, D. B. (1989). Speculative Approaches to Consciousness in Science Fiction. In: Metaphors of Consciousness. Boston: Springer. 395—415.

20. Lotterie, F. (2004). Madame de Staël. La littérature comme « philosophie sensible. Romantisme, 124: 19—30. DOI: 10.3406/roman.2004.1254. (In French).

21. Narcissova, S. Y. (2022). Thinking: the phenomenology of the process. Moscow: International Independent Ecological and Political Science University. 270 p. (In Russ.).

22. Suleymanova, O. A., Borbotko, L. A. (2024). Discursive analysis and pragmatics: is it possible to draw a line? Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Language and literature, 21 (4): 919—929. DOI: 10.21638/spbu09.2024.409. (In Russ.).

23. Tivyaeva, I. (2021). Time, memory and retrospection in works of fiction. In: Time and culture in linguistic and literary discourse. Moscow: Printika. 173—177.

24. Vikulova, L. G., Dubnyakova, O. A., Ryanskaya, E. M., Serebrennikova, E. F. (2018). Polyfunctionality as a property of fundamental verbs. In: Teaching French and Russian as foreign languages: LINGUISTIC AND DIDACTIC ASPECTS. Moscow: Languages of the Peoples of the World, Thesaurus. 25—42. (In Russ.).

25. Volpilhac, A. (2016). Montaigne le « barbare: la crise de la lisibilité des Essais au XVIIe siècle. Fabula-LhT, 16: 395—415. DOI: 10.58282/lht.1625. (In French).

Review

For citations:

Rayskina V.A. Language Markers of Idea Literature in Philosophical Reflexive Paradigm: A Case Study of Michel de Montaigne's “Essais”. Nauchnyi dialog. 2026;15(1):88-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-1-88-107

JATS XML