Linguo-Axiosphere of Russian Society in Feminine and Masculine Sports Chess Discourses (Based on Live Internet Broadcasts)

L. E. Pak

doi:10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-5-194-218

Linguo-Axiosphere of Russian Society in Feminine and Masculine Sports Chess Discourses (Based on Live Internet Broadcasts)

L. E. Pak

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-5-194-218

Full Text:

PDF (Rus)

Generate QR code

Abstract

This study conducts a linguo-axiological analysis of the Russian sports chess discourse from a gender perspective, highlighting its relevance for understanding the linguo-axiosphere of Russian society. The research identifies specific linguistic representations within feminine and masculine sports chess discourses, revealing the content of individual value trajectories that emphasize axiological dominants inherent to each personal linguo-axiosphere. The study constructs both feminine and masculine fragments of the linguo-axiosphere of Russian society, categorizing axiological dominants into three distinct zones: nuclear, near-nuclear, and peripheral. It provides a comprehensive description and explanation of their systemic differences. Findings indicate that the masculine sports chess discourse prioritizes values associated with competition and career success, while the feminine discourse emphasizes self-development and authenticity. The results demonstrate that the structural differences between these identified fragments reflect deeper mechanisms of value organization. Both masculine and feminine sports chess discourses embody different worldviews, each deeply rooted in the institutional and cultural fabric of Russian society.

Keywords

linguo-axiosphere, gender in language, feminine sports chess discourse, masculine sports chess discourse

About the Author

L. E. Pak

Vladivostok State University
Russian Federation

Leonid E. Pak, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Intercultural Communications and Translation Studies

Vladivostok

References

1. Ağçam, R., Özkan, M. (2015). A corpus-based study on evaluation adjectives in academic English. The Proceedings of the 1st GlobELT Conference on Teaching and Learning English as anAdditional Language, 199: 3—11. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.480.

2. Anumyan, K. S., Misisyan, S. S. (2023). Gender stereotypes as markers of the representation of the emoticeme of surprise in the speech of migrants: an associative experiment. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. The series “History and Philology”, 33 (6): 1353—1358. DOI: 10.35634/2412-9534-2023-33-6-1353-1358. (In Russ.).

3. Arutyunova, N. D. (1999). Language and the human world. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. 896 p. ISBN 5-7859-0027-0. (In Russ.).

4. Biber, D., Zhang, M. (2018). Expressing evaluation without grammatical stance: informational persuasion on the web. Corpora, 13 (1): 97—123. DOI: 10.3366/cor.2018.0137.

5. Bobyreva, N. N. (2024). Interdisciplinary sports discourse: the specifics of lexical organization. Kazan Linguistic Journal, 7 (3): 335—344. DOI: 10.26907/2658-3321.2024.7.3.335-344. (In Russ.).

6. Boyd, R. L., Wilson, S. R., Pennebaker, J. W., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., Mihalcea, R. (2015). Values in words: using language to evaluate and understand personal values. Proceedings of the Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 31—40. DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14589.

7. Kandrashkina, O. O., Pisareva, A. G. (2024). Linguistic and stylistic features of the Englishlanguage Internet sports discourse (based on rugby reports). Upper Volga Philological Bulletin, 2 (37): 199—212. DOI: 10.20323/2499-9679-2024-2-37-199. (In Russ.).

8. Karasik, V. I. (2002). Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena Publ. 477 p. ISBN 5-88234-552-2. (In Russ.).

9. Karasik, V. I. (2019). The narrative dimension of linguistic and cultural values. Language and Culture, 47: 59—75. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/47/4. (In Russ.).

10. Kazachenko, O. V. (2020). The study of words expressing values in various linguistic disciplines. Psycholinguistic aspects of the study of speech activity, 18: 168—175. DOI: 10.26170/pla20-01-17. (In Russ.).

11. Kirilina, A. V. (2021). Gender and gender linguistics at the turn of the third millennium. Questions of psycholinguistics, 3 (49): 109—147. DOI: 10.30982/2077-5911-2021-49-3-109-147. (In Russ.).

12. Krasnobaeva-Chernaya, J. V. (2018). The experience of understanding the value picture of the world in phraseology (based on the material of Russian, Ukrainian, English and German languages). Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, 54: 98— 116. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/54/6. (In Russ.).

13. Kravets, A. V., Stroganov, A. A/ (2016). The social nature of values and the problem of organization and interiorization of values and value orientations in the structure of personality. Bulletin of the University, 3: 230—235. (In Russ.).

14. Malysheva, E. G., Rogaleva, O. S. (2024). Communicative dominants of the Internet sports discourse on figure skating. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 17 (9): 3071—3078. DOI: 10.30853/phil20240435. (In Russ.).

15. Nikolaeva, O. V. (2023). Axiological aspects of the semantics of Polynesian ethnic paremias. Far Eastern Philological Journal, 1 (1): 3—12. DOI: 10.24866/2949-2580/2023-1/3-12. (In Russ.).

16. Rajapova, N. B. (2024). Theoretical foundations of gender linguistics. Rajapova. Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural and Social Sciences, 4 (7): 37—42. (In Russ.).

17. Rogaleva, O. S. (2025). Sports discourse on YouTube: structure and specificity of content. Neophilology, 1 (1): 148—159. DOI: 10.20310/2587-6953-2025-11-1-148-159. (In Russ.).

18. Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., Cieciuch, J., Schwartz, Sh. H. (2017). Personal values in human life. Nature Human Behaviour, 1 (9): 630—639. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0185-3.

19. Shmelev, A. D. (2002). The Russian language model of the world. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture. 224 p. ISBN 5-94457-052-0. (In Russ.).

20. Smoliy, E. A. (2017). The problem of values in Russian science. Socio-humanitarian research: collection of scientific and methodological works. Moscow: Pero. 354—360. (In Russ.).

21. Stolyar, E. D. (2019). Formation of evaluative meanings in language. Questions of cognitive linguistics, 2: 41—48. (In Russ.).

22. Teliya, V. N. (1986). The connotative aspect of the semantics of nominative units. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 141 p. (In Russ.).

23. Vezhbitskaya, A. (1996). The language. Culture. Cognition. Moscow: Russian Dictionaries. 416 p. ISBN 5-89216-002-5. (In Russ.).

24. Viktorova, E. Y., Belonozhko, Yu. A. (2023). Gender specificity of the use of discourses in oral English-language popular science discourse (based on TED Talks). Bulletin of the VSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural communication, 2: 66—74. DOI: 10.17308/lic/1680-5755/2023/2/66-74. (In Russ.).

25. Zainuldinov, A. A., Kero Hervilla, E. F. (2019). Lexicographic description of emotional-evaluative vocabulary in Russian and Spanish. Questions of linguistics, 2: 96—110. DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0004304-3. (In Russ.).

26. Zholos, L. M., Kosareva, E. S. (2024). Lexical, grammatical and stylistic features of sports discourse. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2: 80—85. DOI: 10.18522/2070-1403-2024-103-2-80-85. (In Russ.).

Review

For citations:

Pak L.E. Linguo-Axiosphere of Russian Society in Feminine and Masculine Sports Chess Discourses (Based on Live Internet Broadcasts). Nauchnyi dialog. 2026;15(5):194-218. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-5-194-218

JATS XML