Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Image of Chelyabinsk in Contemporary Prose: Authorial Optics of City Depiction

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-5-264-287

Abstract

This article examines the representation of Chelyabinsk in contemporary prose. The research is based on the works of D. Bavilsky, M. Boyarkina, and L. Averbakh. The analysis of the material reveals a diverse generic orientation of the texts that construct the city’s image. The primary objective of this study is to identify the authors' distinct optics for depicting the city: the existential and metaphysical perspective (D. Bavilsky), the ironic approach (M. Boyarkina), and the philosophical-nostalgic viewpoint (L. Averbakh). The paper characterizes the generic models that demonstrate various vectors for comprehending the urban image. It highlights the specific features of portraying the city as a peripheral space, whose properties include frontier emptiness and liminality, within the genre experiments of D. Bavilsky, which are connected to the concept of an “infinite text.” The study also explores the mechanisms for constructing a city text in the ironic novella by M. Boyarkina, whose creative manner aligns with the stylistic conventions of “pink noir.” Furthermore, it analyzes the generic model of L. Averbakh's prose, which possesses an intermedial nature and proves to be the most adequate for expressing the image of the city as a symbol of childhood, a home for the soul, and a place of inspiration inextricably linked to music. The authors conclude that the works united by the intention to create an image of Chelyabinsk provide evidence for the existence of a distinct “Chelyabinsk text” as a unique phenomenon with its inherent aesthetic characteristics.

About the Authors

E. V. Ponomareva
Moscow Center for Education Quality
Russian Federation

Elena V. Ponomareva, Doctor of Philology, Professor

Moscow



N. N. Shlemova
South Ural State University (National Research University)
Russian Federation

Natalia N. Shlemova, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Russian Language and Literature

Chelyabinsk



E. V. Kanishcheva
South Ural State University (National Research University)
Russian Federation

Elena V. Kanishcheva, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Russian Language and Literature, corresponding author

Chelyabinsk



References

1. Abashev, V. V. (2000). Perm as a text. Perm in Russian culture and literature of the XX century. Perm: Publishing House of Perm University. 404 p. ISBN 978-5-4475-0441-0. (In Russ.).

2. Davydov, O. M. (2017). The poetic image of Chelyabinsk in the context of the Ural literary myth. In: Dergachev readings — 2016. Russian literature: dialogue of cultural and national traditions: proceedings of the XII All-Russian Scientific Conference (Yekaterinburg, October 13—14, 2016): on the 70th anniversary of the United Museum of Writers of the Urals. Yekaterinburg: Ural Publishing House. University. 274—279. (In Russ.).

3. Golubkov, S. A. (2010). Semantics and metaphysics of the city: “urban text” in Russian literature of the twentieth century: textbook. manual. Samara: Samara University. 167 p. ISBN 978-5-86465-481-1. (In Russ.).

4. Golubkov, S. A. (2023). Provincial town as a spatial model in satirical and humorous literature. Semiotic research. Semiotic studies, 3 (1): 32—40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2023-3-1-32-40. (In Russ.).

5. Kovalenko, L. A. (2017). The image of Sverdlovsk-Yekaterinburg in the modern documentary prose of the Urals. Philological class, 4 (50): 123—129. DOI: 10.26710/fk17-04-19. (In Russ.).

6. Kovtun, N. V. (ed.). (2015). Siberian identity in the mirror of a literary text: tropes, toposes, genre forms of the 19th—21st centuries. The Universals of Culture series: a monograph, VI. Moscow: FLINTA: Nauka. 382 p. ISBN 978-5-9765-2541-2. (In Russ.).

7. Litovskaya, M. A. Author’s restructuring of mythology places: Bazhovsky Yekaterinburg. UrFU Electronic Scientific Archive. Available at: http://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/49249/1/dc_2004_103.pdf (accessed 01.02.2017). (In Russ.).

8. Lotman, Yu. M. (1984). Symbolism of St. Petersburg and problems of semiotics of the city. Semiotics of the city and urban culture. St. Petersburg. Works on sign systems, XVIII, 664: 30—45. (In Russ.).

9. Mitin, I. I. (2017). Mental maps of the city. The history of the concept and the variety of approaches. Urban Research and Practice, 2 (3): 64—79. DOI: 10.17323/usp23201764-79. (In Russ.).

10. Nikolaeva, E. V. (2014). From rhizomes and folds to fractals. Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. The series “Humanities and Social Sciences”, 2. Available at: https://vestnikgum.ru/upload/iblock/152/114_120.рdf (accessed 25.06.2025). (In Russ.).

11. Rastorguyeva, V. S. (2018). Provincial Text of Russian Literature: Steel City and a Person (on Works of Lipetsk Writers). Nauchnyi dialog, 12: 220—232. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2018-12-220-232. (In Russ.).

12. Sinelnikova, L. N. (2017). Rhizome and discourse of intermediality. Bulletin of the People’s Friendship University of Russia. Series: Linguistics, 21 (4): 805—821. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-4-805-821. (In Russ.).

13. Snigireva, T. A., Podobenov, A. V. (eds.). (2019). The phenomenon of the unfinished: a monograph. Yekaterinburg: Ural Publishing House. University. 670 p. (In Russ.).

14. Solovyova, E. (2021). Island opportunity: text sets up networks. Dmitry Bavilsky’s literary hyperproject as a new type of relationship between a writer and a book. Ural, 3. Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/ural/2021/3/vozmozhnost-ostrovatekst-rasstavlyaet-seti.html (accessed 25.06.2025). (In Russ.).

15. Sozina, E. K. (2005). The Yekaterinburg text by Natalia Smirnova. Ural, 4. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/ural/2005/4/soz16.html (accessed 01.02.2017). (In Russ.).

16. Stavtseva, E. M. (2017). Chelyabinsk Art Museum. The image of the city in Russian literature. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 11 (77) / 1: 41—44. (In Russ.).

17. Toporov, V. N. (2003). The Petersburg text of Russian literature: Selected works. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb. 617 p. ISBN 5-210-01545-9. (In Russ.).

18. Tsvigun, T. V., Chernyakov, A. N. (2022). On the geopoetics of the city of K: optics of feeling. Word.<url>: Baltic Accent, 13 (4): 111—123. DOI: 10.5922/2225-5346-2022-4-8. (In Russ.).

19. Vlasova, E. G., Vedernikov, A. P. (2019). Travelogues in the history of literary discovery of the Urals: on the role of genre in the structure of local text. Ural Historical Bulletin, 2 (63): 143—150. DOI: 10.30759/1728-9718-2019-2(63)-143-149. (In Russ.).

20. Wunenburger, J.-J. (2003). The Urban Imaginary: An Exploration of the Possible or of the Originary? Centre of Contemporary Culture of Barcelona. Available at: https://www.cccb.org/rcs_gene/urban_imaginary.pdf (accessed 25.06.2025).

21. Zamyatin, D. N. (2004). Metageography: The space of images and images of space. Moscow: Agraf. 512 p. ISBN 5-7784-0237-6. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Ponomareva E.V., Shlemova N.N., Kanishcheva E.V. Image of Chelyabinsk in Contemporary Prose: Authorial Optics of City Depiction. Nauchnyi dialog. 2026;15(5):264-287. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2026-15-5-264-287

Views: 94

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)