Grammatical Semantics of a Complex Sentence with an Immediate Succession Conjunction “yedva” [hardly]
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-11-98-111
Abstract
The question of qualifying the meaning of allied means, which in traditional grammar are defined as syntactic markers of “immediate” or “fast” succession, and in the part of corpus studies are considered as connectors of “immediate succession”, is studied. Complex sentences with a conjunction “yedva” [hardly] is the object of the study. The types of taxis relations that are expressed in such sentences are analyzed. The research has shown that the grammatical semantics of sentences with the conjunction of “immediate succession” is determined by a whole complex of categorical features, the most important of which is the linguistic representation of time in events. This feature is an indicator of the category of the time order. It was found that the sentences under consideration signal “disturbance of the natural course of events”, and the marker of such a “failure” is a conjunction “yedva” [hardly]. The authors believe that its semantic function, is complicated by the meta-meaning “exaggeration”, which indicates a special communicative attitude of the speaker. The relevance of the research lies in the consistent functional and semantic interpretation of grammatical phenomena. Such interpretation takes into account the established grammatical tradition of considering syntactic units. In the context of modern linguistic research, the scientific continuity of research paradigms is extremely important.
About the Authors
N. V. Semenova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Saint-Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation”;
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ResearcherID 57192383772, SPIN 7609-1514
Doctor of Philology, Professor, Department of Language Training; Professor, Higher School of Linguodidactics and Translation
St. Petersburg
N. O. Grigorieva
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ResearcherID 57194237926, SPIN 2311-7350
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Language Training, Associate Professor, Department of Theory of Language and Russian Language
Rostov-on-Don
Zh. Yu. Polezhaeva
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Kemerovo State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ResearcherID 5719592131, SPIN 1676-1221
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department for Work with Foreign Students
Kemerovo
References
1. Arutyunova, N. D. (1983). Sravnitelnaya otsenka situatsiy [Comparative assessment of situations]. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya: Literatura i yazyk [News of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Series: Literature and Language], 42 (4): 330—341. (In Russ.).
2. Beloshapkova, V. A. (1977). Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk. Sintaksis [Modern Russian language. Syntax]. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola. 278 p. (In Russ.).
3. Boguslavskiy, I. M. (1996). Sfera deystviya leksicheskikh edinits [Scope of lexical units]. Moskva: Shkola Yazyki russkoy kultury. 464 p. (In Russ.).
4. Bondarko, A.V. (1996). Kategoriya vremennogo poryadka i funktsii glagolnykh form vida i vremeni v vyskazyvanii (na materiale russkogo yazyka) [The category of the temporal order and function of the verb forms of the form and tense in the utterance (based on the material of the Russian language)]. In: Mezhkategorialnye svyazi v grammatike [Intercategorical connections in grammar]. SanktPeterburg: Dmitriy Bulanin. 6—21. (In Russ.).
5. Daneš F. (1964). A Three-Level Approach to Syntax. In: Travaux linguistiques de Prague (L’École de Prague d’aujourd’hui). Prague: Academia. 1. 225—240.
6. Galton, H. (1976). The main functions of the Slavic verbal aspects. Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts Skopje, Univerzitetska pechatnitsa “Kiril i Metodij”. 310 p.
7. Grigoryeva, N. O. (2013). Konstruktsii s polifunktsionalnymi sluzhebnymi slovami: tekstovyy potentsial [Constructions with polyfunctional service words: text potential]. Medialingvistika [Medialinguistics], 2: 134—137. (In Russ.).
8. Dudko, L. N. (2007). O semantike i osobennostyakh funktsionirovaniya soyuzov bystrogo sledovaniya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [On semantics of modern russian conjunctions expressing rapid change of events]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya Filologiya. Vostokovedenie. Zhurnalistika [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series Philology. Oriental studies. Journalism], 3—2: 129—135. (In Russ.).
9. Kidanova, M. E. (2017). Korpusnoye issledovanie struktury sostavnykh konnektorov, vyrazhayushchikh otnoshenie kontaktnogo predshestvovaniya [Corpus study of the structure of composite connectors, denoting the relation of contact precedence]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya Filologiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series Philology], 4: 209—221. (In Russ.).
10. Khrakovskiy, V. S. (2003). Kategoriya taksisa (obshchaya kharakteristika) [Taxis category (general characteristics)]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Questions of linguistics], 2: 32—54. (In Russ.).
11. Khrakovskiy, V. S. (2009). Anketa dlya opisaniya taksisnykh konstruktsiy [Form for the description of taxis structures]. In: Tipologiya taksisnykh konstruktsiy [Taxis typology]. Moskva: Znak. 865—882.
12. Khrakovskiy, V. S. (ed.). (2009). Tipologiya taksisnykh konstruktsiy [Taxis typology]. Moskva: Znak. 906 p. (In Russ.).
13. Kobozeva, I. (2019). Konnektory, vyrazhayushchie otnoshenie neposredstvennogo predshestvovaniya odnogo sobytiya drugomu [Connectors expressing the relationship of immediate precedence of one event to another]. In: Struktura konnektorov i metody ee opisaniya [Structure of connectors and methods of its description]. Moskva: TORUS PRESS. 87—117. (In Russ.).
14. Semenova, N. V. (2004). Kategoriya taksisa v sovremennom russkom yazyke: author’s abstract of Doct. Diss [Taxis category in modern Russian, author’s abstract of Doct. Diss]. Moskva. 46 p. (In Russ.).
15. Semenova, N., Grigoryeva, N. (2017). The subjective time in a sentence. XLinguae Journal, 10/2: 101—111. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2017.10.02.09.
16. Shmeleva, T. V. (1998). Sredstva vyrazheniya metasmysla preuvelichenie [Means of expressing metasense exaggeration]. In: Kultura rechi [Culture of speech]. Velikiy Novgorod. 66—75. (In Russ.).
17. Shvedova, N. Yu. (eds.). (1980). Russkaya grammatika. Sintaksis [Russian grammar. Syntax]. Moskva: Nauka. 2/2. 709 p. (In Russ.).
18. Uryson, E. (2013). Conjunctions, Contehtualizers, and Syntah Theory. In: Studie z aplikovane lingvistiky (Studies in applied linguisticvs (SALi), 1: 7—20.
Review
For citations:
Semenova N.V., Grigorieva N.O., Polezhaeva Zh.Yu. Grammatical Semantics of a Complex Sentence with an Immediate Succession Conjunction “yedva” [hardly]. Nauchnyi dialog. 2020;1(11):98-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-11-98-111
Views:
582
Email this article 